All Channels
Popular
990°

Pachter: Mass Effect may come to PS3

PSU writes:
"Remember when we did a feature on Mass Effects chances of coming to the PlayStation 3 console? It was a really optimistic feature that highlighted the many reasons why the Mass Effect trilogy could end up landing on the PlayStation 3. PSU is not the only one to think this, as it has been a topic of debate ever since EA purchased Bioware a while back.

Michael Pachter, Wedbush Morgan Securities Analyst, has taken his stance on the entire situation by stating he believes that Mass Effect will not remain an Xbox 360 exclusive.

Speaking with a panel of others on Gametrailers, Pachter commented, "Trust me, Electronic Arts, when they threw out the 300 million that is multiplatform that is not 360 only." And when asked if it will come to the PS3, he finished with, "It has to, I wouldn't be shocked if Mass Effect 1 came to PlayStation 3."

Currently Bioware still labels Mass Effect as an Xbox 360 exclusive. The first game in what is planned as a trilogy is already released with great reviews. Perhaps when it is time to reveal more on Mass Effect 2, will Bioware be able to talk more freely in relation to ME on the PS3."

Skerj6771d ago

I'll believe it when I see it, MS might just co-publish the thing and prevent that from ever happening.

ruibing6771d ago

MS probably wouldn't want it to come to the PS3 because they will lose face, so, in the worst case scenario, I would just like it to come to the PC at least. I like good games and good story, Mass Effect has it but I'm not about to buy a 360 over it.

ry-guy6771d ago (Edited 6771d ago )

Kind of beat me to the punch. Microsoft owns the publishing rights to the first two games. It is that third game that is up in the air.

marinelife96771d ago

I'll play it if they fix the long elevator rides/loading times. And actually put some unique content on all of the worlds. But I don't believe a word Pachter says. He even admitted himself that he throws stuff on a wall to see what sticks.

Leathersoup6771d ago

BioShock and Mass Effect... side by side ;)

solidt126771d ago

If EA wants it to be multiplatform then it will be. Bottome line. They can buy out MS if the have to or whatever but it is all in the hand of EA. EA owns their soul now.

Percy6771d ago

Then you must be looking at the 360 rack. I personally think mass effect has about as good a chance of coming to the ps3 as final fantasy 13 has of going to the 360.

myxomatosis6771d ago

Well untill they improve the game stability, they can keep mass effect an exclusive. i dont have enough fingers to count how often that game has crapped the bed while i was playing it. its pretty short too, and the side quests are boring. i just hope the second one is better, i was dissappointed by the first.

Leathersoup6771d ago

Just in case you didn't see the wink at the end of my sentence, here it is again. ;)

I was attempting to make a link between this story and all the previous, "BioShock is coming to the PS3" stories that were the rage a few weeks ago.

As far as I'm concerned, if Mass Effect ends up on the PS3 I'm all for it. BioWare makes great games and if more people get to enjoy them on different systems, BioWare will earn more money.

As for the whole EA owning and controlling BioWare. It makes me afraid. Every company that EA has taken over and decided to control has disappeared. Take, for instance, Westwood. EA took over and nothing even remotely Westwood ever appears except for C&C regurgitation. Whee.

IntelligentAj6771d ago

I don't believe this not one bit. Also it doesn't matter much to me as I'll already have a great RPG to play in FF13.

Percy6770d ago

lol sorry about that name screw up did it on accident. the sarcasm went right over my head. i thought you were serious

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 6770d ago
hulk_bash19876771d ago (Edited 6771d ago )

Here come all the "no way in hell" and "it'll happen" comments. Let the flamming begin. Anyways my personal opinion is that w/ the flyaway success of the 1st, Microsoft aint gonna let is one go, but anything is possible.

Capt CHAOS6771d ago

Still, good for gamers if it comes to the PS3...

Lord_Mike6771d ago

Well I hope your right about Microsoft not letting it go. I don't think many PS3 owners will buy the game.

THE TERMINATOR6771d ago

Wouldnt want this crap to come on Ps3 any way. Xbots you can keep it.

socsca6771d ago

I'm guessing that when it does come to the ps3 (if it does) you'll be like "oh I tried it and now that I see it on the PS3 it really rocks!!! Xbox 360 pwnd!". Anybody disagreeing: *cough* Oblivion...

Bebedora6771d ago

Yup. You summed it up pretty well there. Even if this guy doesn't do it (if ever ME goes PS3) I can see a lot of those two comments related to posters.

killax35636771d ago

If Mass Effect comes to the ps3, EA better fix it. ME may be pushing the Xbox 360 to the max but the ps3 should be able to handle the game with ease.

CrazzyMan6771d ago

well, Oblivion looks on PS3 BETTER and DON`T have long downloadings.

Now imagine Mass effect with short donwloadings, no texture pop ups, some added content, without frame rate drops. That would be REally a GREAT POLISHED game.

The game will be perfect, if they will improve teammates AI.
And as you can see in Uncharted, AI is good there, so there is a chance, that in ME on PS3 we would have a good AI.

I would like to play such game without so MANY issues on PS3. =)

ry-guy6771d ago (Edited 6771d ago )

The texture problem (which I don't really see as a problem) is something related to the Unreal Engine 3. Even Unreal Tournament 3 for the PS3 shows this problem to some degree. This is not an Xbox hardware problem.

And if AI sold games we'd see a flip in sales between Uncharted and Mass Effect. Unforutnantly, team AI means crap to overall game play. In fact 99% of the time I don't even think about giving commands to my teammates unless I want to use their powers.

unlimited6771d ago

same i dont really care about this game..but im sure there is some ps3 fans who love it to come to the PS3. Im all for games to increase the ps3 library..

wallace10006771d ago

Have you played the game or is it simply crap because it isn't on the PS3?

drewlusk6771d ago

Crap? This game is better than anything that the PS3 has put out yet so shut your mouth you stupid ass.

solidt126771d ago

I have it on the 360 and it is a good game, but i hope that when they bring it to the PS3 they fix some of the problems it has. textures load very slow and there are frame rate issues. I think that the PS3 version would have alot faster load times like Oblivion did since they can cache files on the Harddrive. If they don't bring it to the PS3 it's like leaving money on the table. The same for Bioshock.

Sarick6771d ago

Oblivion on the PS3 didn't even use the cells potential. From what I read Oblivion didn't use the SPUs at all. If EA did make ME for the PS3 and actually used the features of the cell it'd hard to imagine the possibilities.

Saying the PS3 version runs better when the DEVs didn't even use the SPUs makes me wonder what this game would do on the PS3.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 6771d ago
Genuine6771d ago

I think in 2008 we are going to see the ps3 losing exclusives, not the other way around.

NoUseMerc6771d ago

Not really true...already you have Lost Planet, Eternal Sonata, and possibly Bioshock coming to the PS3...and many developers now are moving to put PS3 as lead development platform. I wouldn't be surprised if this is the beginning of a trend.

Genuine6771d ago (Edited 6771d ago )

I might believe Lost Planet and Eternal Sonata because they are Japanse developed. Do you have any credible proof regarding Bioshock? Or any proof that devs are making the ps3 the lead platform. And I'm not talking about PSU or a delusional sony head.

With the 360's lead, momentum, and record breaking attach rate keeping games with big production values exclusive to ps3 would be business suicide.

SlippyMadFrog6771d ago

If I was a publisher and my company's success purely rests on how well our game will sell, then it is common sense to release it on the Xbox360. If you look at the software sales, Xbox360 is far ahead of the pack. An added bonus will be that it can also be easily ported to the PC.
If you make a game only for the PS3, -> not so good sales -> costs a lot to port since the difference in architecture.
The performance gains (if any) from developing on the PS3 doesn't outweigh the cost.

This is why I think that the Xbox360 will have the strongest lineup next year.

NoUseMerc6771d ago

@ Genuine

Yeah, send me a PM and I can send you my proof,..Bioshock has been in development for the PS3 for quite a while. They just have to wait until after Xmas to say anything on it due to Microsoft's deal. They paid to make it exclusive till 2008.

Bebedora6771d ago

If you have proof of BS being in development for quite a while... I am interested to know. The little I saw on a friends hampered/stuttering PC made me thrilled about it.

socsca6771d ago

Who exactly is making the PS3 their lead development platform? I find that impossible to believe since (no matter what fanboys might say) its still not even close to the amounts of 360s sold. Also, aren't most developers having separate teams for separate consoles, making the whole "lead platform" debate unnecesary? Mmmmmm?

I guess its possible that Mass Effect comes to the PS3, about as possible as Uncharted making an appearence on the 360 tho...
But from an ill informed rational choice economist perspective it would make sense.

to4076771d ago (Edited 6771d ago )

my guy show us your proof that bioshock has been in development for a while for ps3 and let everyone see it and please stop blabbing

NoUseMerc6771d ago

@ socsca

Both Sega Rally and Burnout Paradise are PS3 as lead platform. I could do some research and come up with a bigger list if you want...but developers are finding it cheaper and easier to port from PS3 to Xbox, and it makes for better games too.

Bebedora6771d ago (Edited 6771d ago )

The devs behind pro street. Didn't they say they ported from PS3 to 360? I think that was the case. They only saw pros with doing it. Better code and easier porting than vise versa.

[edit] beat me to it. Burnout Paradise might be what I was thinking about.

Omegasyde6771d ago

Genuine, I already see Xbox losing more of its exclusives..

Sooner or later Real time strategies games will come to the ps3. Command and conquer 3 is coming to the PS3. I bet my account on it. Theres a market for them on the PS3 especially with more keyboard and mouse support. There isn't even a RTS now on the PS3, hmm Pachter should of saw that coming.

Not sure about Sega universe at war however, but it might also. Exclusives are more of staying in the hands of each system especially with a high attach rate of the 360 and the huge momentum that the PS3 is getting at the moment.

Things were different when there was only 4 million ps3's to 9 million Xbox 360's earlier this year. I don't see any said exclusive going to other systems (besides RTS's, but they were never really exclusive or were they?). Micrsoft better reach into it's wallet.

Jack T6771d ago

Bioshock will never be released on PS3. Anyone who says it already in development etc. Is a liar.

Ashta6771d ago

If you look WAAYYY back in the very earliest stages of the development of Bioshock there was a PS3 version already being worked on. However, Microsoft and their huge bags of money (I'm not trying to sound vindictive this really did happen) paid 2kGames to stop development on the PS3 version so they could keep it as a PC/360 exclusive at the time of distribution in 2007.

NOW! Whether or not the PS3 version has resumed development is another question, but the fact of the matter is that a PS3 version had already been approved in the beginning but it had been stalled and shut down developmental wise due to a corporate money hat thanks to Microsoft Game Studios.

If they have resumed development on a PS3 Bioshock then that would be awesome, but since I already own it on PC I don't myself picking it up again. Would be nice for people who don't own an updated PC or a 360 to be able to enjoy the game without having to spend hundreds of dollars in seperate hardware.

fusionboxer6771d ago

SCEA boss Tretton (not sure how much trust we have in him) has stated that multiple studios are now using the ps3 as it's lead development platform.

Let's name a few:
- Criterion whose game is published by EA and now has influenced more studios within EA to do the same.
-Midway stated that from now on they'll develop for the ps3 first then the 360 after the horror, which was stranglehold and area 51
- Free Radical who are working on supposedly ps3 exclusive Haze are starting with the ps3 and will most likely move the project to the 360 later
-Epic decided to make Unreal tournament on the ps3 first as well then port it to the 360.
-And last but not least is Infinity Ward from Activision who decided to not really put ps3 as their lead platform, but put their best programmers on the ps3 to do simultaneous development for both consoles.

http://www.mcvuk.com/news/2...

EDMIX6771d ago

The PS3 going into 2008 has more Exclusives then MS. Infact most Multiplaform games coming out nex year were once 360 exclusives in game or series form. Quake Wars (Quake 4 exclusive on 360) Riddick area, Sanits row 2, Condemed 2, Lost planet, Bioshock, Eternal sonata, and a crap load more. Devs are not making these games 360 exclusives any more. There are a lot of games that are just of now being made on PS3, that have not been before.

Bioshock, Fact it will be on the PS3. what developer in there right mind won't put it on the PS3? (the ones that hate money?) and don't use the whole, lack of PS3 sales crap cause the PS3 has sold like 6.5 million, soon to be 7 million. They put the darkness on the PS3 in Feb, when there was like 4 million PS3s or less, but at 6.5 million they won't put Bioshock, there better game on PS3? Its timed, just like Oblivion. FYI you don't really need proof for these things, just look at there past games and you'll know its timed.

+ Show (11) more repliesLast reply 6771d ago
Neurotoxin6771d ago (Edited 6771d ago )

Yawn... Mass effect on ps3!? Michael Pachter, Wedbush Morgan Securities Analyst says it will.

Also.....Ronald MacDonald, Macdonald`s says Uncharted is coming to 360.

I`m fu*king loving it.

(p.s The yawn is to do with the continuing rubbish about Exclusive games going to opposing platforms, I would love Mass effect on PS3, its just not going to happen. Hope the 360 folk are enjoying it though.

SlippyMadFrog6771d ago

Got Mass Effect this weekend. It's pure gaming bliss on a little silver disc!

Kr1556771d ago

not saying it will deffinatly happen but uncharted is owned by sony it can't go multi plat unless they sell it (like crash bandicoot) ME however is not owned by microsoft. 2 now me is owned by EA. ea makes multi platform games and does not make deals with consoles to share publishing rights. as a developer ea sucks and if they do port me then the question is will anyone actually want it

Neurotoxin6771d ago

Phew luckily for me it was just a joke comparison.

Show all comments (213)
60°

Final Fantasy X 25th Anniversary Website Launches With New Nomura Artwork and Merchandise

Square Enix launches Final Fantasy X 25th anniversary site, revealing new Nomura art, books, music releases, and merchandise.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
-Foxtrot64d ago

Look I know VIII has its issues and all that but how on earth can the do big anniversary events with new artwork and merchandise for VII, IX and X yet VIII got sweet f*** all.

They could have given it something during its 25th anniversary yet all it got was a single Happy Anniversary post on their social media.

solideagle64d ago

they should know that we are OG fans of VIII as it sold truckload as well. not as much as VII or X. I personally didn't like IX but X and VI are my personal fav.

Shadow Hearts 2 covenant is another game I love. I hope one day someone can make remake, I would be delighted

Relientk7764d ago

Final Fantasy VIII is great and you are always the first to defend it in the comments

40°

15 Years Ago, Mortal Kombat (2011) Saved Gaming’s Biggest Fighting Franchise

A brutal reset, a smarter story, and a return to what made it great—Mortal Kombat (2011) revived the series.

Read Full Story >>
fortressofsolitude.co.za
italiangamer73d ago

"Gaming’s Biggest Fighting Franchise"

Press X to (seriously) doubt.

DarXyde71d ago

Underrated comment. I used to hate that game so much that any time my siblings asked me to play it, I just picked Hom and shut myself down mid-match.

Soy71d ago

And then MK1 killed it again.

DivineHand12571d ago (Edited 71d ago )

15 years went by so fast. I remember playing through the story mode at launch.

90°

PlayStation legend Shuhei Yoshida says Jim Ryan fired him because he didn't listen to him

Why did Sony push Shuhei Yoshida out of his role leading PlayStation's first-party games? He'd overseen some huge successes. Well, apparently, he didn't listen.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
Relientk7772d ago

Yeah I can see that for sure. Shuhei Yoshida should have been in charge not Jim Ryan.

Cacabunga72d ago

It should be free highway for him now.. but Sony are too stupid to see this, especially that moron Hulst

S2Killinit72d ago (Edited 72d ago )

Wtf why all that anger. PlayStation is dominating on every level. Besides I think there is a little more to hiring a CEO than just who is available. Its not like its a athlete your team wants to buy.

neutralgamer199272d ago

S2Killinit

live service failures, chasing trends, closing studios. yes dominating

Cacabunga72d ago

Sony is Dominating because competition is not existing. Compared to previous gens this is the poorest in terms of software offerings.

Last gen we got Uncharted 4 Lost Legacy and TLOU2 from ND alone.

This is so far a remasters gen, with no competition to lift up the quality

1nsomniac72d ago (Edited 72d ago )

..."PlayStation is dominating on every level"....

...Really???

PlayStation are soon heading into a new generation in the not to distant future. They currently have the worst customer satisfaction they've ever sustained as a company. The company is heading for a huge crash while at the same time they'll need to be planning how they are going to try and win back that favour and the build up to their new releases.

Yes financially they're winning but they're going to have to ride out this complete public corporate disaster. No one has faith in the company or the product anymore. They've damaged their public image so much this generation. Greed can kill anyone.

medman72d ago

Hulst is a disaster......

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 72d ago
blacktiger72d ago

He would've done the same thing and fire Jim Ryan and Shuhei would be the villain. Why?
Because Elite creates the narrative and distraction for gamers, users and citizens.

Outside_ofthe_Box72d ago

More confirmation that Jim Ryan is the culprit for what has happened to Sony. Hulst needs to go too. What sucks is that a lot of the good top heads at Sony are no longer there. I wish that guys that were forced out prematurely by Dumbo Jimbo like Shuhei and Layden came back.

robtion71d ago

Yep. Yoshida was responsible for bringing one of the best games of this generation to playstation (Stellar Blade). He is an actual gamer and is in touch with what gamers want (creative, fun games, not GaaS and agenda pushing). He also seems like a genuinely nice guy if you watch some interviews. Of course they got rid of him.

darthv7272d ago

Makes you wonder if MS even thought about hiring him after Phil and Sarah were leaving. He certainly couldn't make their situation any worse.

Agent7572d ago

Microflop. After Windows XP and Xbox 360, it all went floppy.

S2Killinit72d ago

Floppy 😆
No pun intended

badz14972d ago

Yoshida for President! Jim Ryan was and always be a hack! Sony should get Shu back

Lightning7772d ago

All the gamer/consumer lead heads are gone across PS and Xbox. shuhei gone phil's gone (questionable) but gone. The future of gaming is somewhat uncertain across the board.

Show all comments (30)