All Channels
Popular
120°

Sony: Content and network separates PS Vita from mobile

With the PlayStation Vita set to launch next month, Sony president and CEO Andrew House has outlined how the handheld will compete against mobile and tablet platforms that have blossomed in recent years.

Read Full Story >>
beefjack.com
Rainstorm815249d ago

Yea it sad that they are forced to explain this, it should be obvious

darthv725249d ago

i must also throw out something vita does not represent. Convenience.

I never thought about phones when growing up playing games. There was no point because ....it was a phone. When phone started being used for other things like messaging and surfing the web it seemed only obvious they would be tapped for the very entertainment medium I held dear. Games.

we are not talking the 2nd coming here but they also will not stay the way they are. Just as big bulky computers evolved into smaller compact laptop/netbooks and consoles evolving into smaller portable gaming systems. The phone too has evolved to try and combine both into an even smaller more convenient package.

I dont game on a phone personally but the temptation is there with each new smartphone coming out better than the last and the programing skills getting better as well.

People will poke fun at mobile gaming and say it isnt real gaming but I am reminded at people poking fun at nintendo for trying to recreate that home console experience on the go with the original gameboy.

It has to start somewhere. I will gladly take the vita without question but remain optimistic at smartphones and watch them evolve like consoles and portables did over these last many years.

MaxXAttaxX5248d ago (Edited 5248d ago )

Dude, just... no.

Phones lack proper gaming controls and immersive games(exclusive or third-party).
You can keep your "conveniently" small phones. But I'd never trade a handheld for the WEAKEST kind of gaming which is found on phones.

KeybladeMaster5249d ago

I cannot describe how excited I am to finally be able to get this device in one more month!!! The wait is agonizing.

MultiConsoleGamer5250d ago

Don't forget the best d-pad on a portable game system and two incredible analog sticks.

MasterCornholio5249d ago

Sony did say that the Vita was made for the core. So it's no surprise that a core gaming device has such a good control scheme.

XperiaRay

eferreira5249d ago

I love my iphone but the games need buttons, makes them suck without any

Dojan1235249d ago

Agree While the IPad is great for surfing the Net and board games are fun, the virtual sticks have never felt right when trying to play any FPS. I do not care how powerful the IPad becomes, I need either a K/B or sticks to play.

5249d ago Replies(1)
tarbis5249d ago

If they put cross platform play on many multiplayer games for both PS3 and PSV. Network gaming as we know it will go BOOM!

80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
36d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted35d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8535d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele35d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla35d ago (Edited 35d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk35d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay35d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 35d ago
Athlon10135d ago (Edited 35d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit35d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg34d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10134d ago (Edited 34d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14935d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
48d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_48d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle48d ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker48d ago (Edited 48d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit48d ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog48d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_48d ago (Edited 48d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog48d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad48d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_48d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage48d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda48d ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

48d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
40°

Sony Shows Off 20 Minutes of Crimson Desert on a Base PS5

Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
BlazedKong74d ago

looks god awful on the base systems