All Channels
Popular
170°

PS4 Release In 2013? Rumor Roundup

VGB: A PlayStation 4 roundup of all the latest rumors and facts. The goal here is to show when Sony’s PS4 is expected to launch and what exciting new technologies have been hinted it may include at release.

When do you think PS4 will be released?

Read Full Story >>
videogamesblogger.com
Batzi5244d ago

More like PS4 announcement to me :P I highly doubt it is coming 2013.

dark-hollow5243d ago

Do you people really think that sony will release it in 2014??
No way!! First they wont let nintendo or microsoft get a huge lead on them.
Secondly, the vita will release next month!! It will have so much room before the ps3 release in early 2013.

GribbleGrunger5243d ago (Edited 5243d ago )

look, people really must stop thinking like console gamers and start thinking like a hardware company. Sony do not consider themselves in a race. they are in this business to make money.

with Vita and the PS3 (and to some degree the PSP and PS2), Sony can continue to make money without further investment for a while. the only real competition for next gen is MS. Nintendo are entering the HD generation for the first time this year. as far as the HD generation is concerned they're years behind PS3 and the 360.

both Sony and MS are trying to extend the life beyond the ten years and i mean that in the sense that they also want the crossover to come later too. MS has Kinect and Sony has MOVE, 3D and now Vita (which will have more and more connectivity with the PS3).

Sony are in a better position here. with MOVE they have the WiiHD, with Vita they have 'potentially' a Wii-U and with an upgrade to the PSEye (they're working on a 3D camera) they have Kinect covered too

it could well be 2014 and it could even be only the reveal then

dark-hollow5243d ago (Edited 5243d ago )

"Sony do not consider themselves in a race. they are in this business to make money"
it is a race! having a lead on your competition is a smart business move.

"the only real competition for next gen is MS."
define "REAL" competition? if sony and ms didnt saw nintendo as a "real" competitor then why the invested hundred of millions for move and kinect, an obvious reaction to the motion gaming revolution that started by the wii?

"Sony are in a better position here. with MOVE they have the WiiHD, with Vita they have 'potentially' a Wii-U and with an upgrade to the PSEye (they're working on a 3D camera) they have Kinect covered too"
if developers didnt support much the move+ps3 combo which cost only about $280 together, how do you think they would support a combo that cost $500???
in theory, the ps vita can do what the wii u controller do, but how much demand, support this combo would get?? am sure %99 of the wii u games if not all of them gonna support the controller because that why they are designed for in the first place!! the vita/ps3 combo pretty much would be tacked on in some sony first party games and that pretty much it! sure i maybe wrong but it wont, in any way imaginable gonna compete with the wii u.

wii u is a next gen console wither you like it or not! the average gamer doesnt care about "REAL" next gen consoles or all that stuff. they see a new hot console with new games and they gonna flock for it, but what could make it worse for sony that if the wii u was actually powerful and have strong core/third party support. then it would not only snatch the casual market, but the hardcore too!!

sony will reveal the ps4 in late 2012 and release it on 2013.

a 2014 release is too far let alone a reveal!!!
mark my words...

sikbeta5243d ago

Said it before and saying it again, IF Sony launch in 2014 they're screwed, by that time Wii-U user-base will be in the millions, why they'd let their competition gain so much marketshare by let them be alone for so long, doesn't make sense...

DigitalRaptor5244d ago

Pretty much all of Sony's most anticipated exclusives would already be released by 2013 so it's viable, but since Vita needs room to breathe and Sony will already have cash flow from their other active platforms (PS2, PS3, PSP, Vita), it's hard to imagine that they need to release it yet.

2014 sounds more appropriate.

sikbeta5243d ago

I can understand that Sony can't launch or unveil a PS4 this year because that would kill the Vita, pretty much like the launch and total focus on the PS3 killed the PSP,so this year they'll try to push the Vita and one year later unveil the PS4 with a late 2013 release date would be a good strategy, if they wait too long, they'll not have any chance...

Sharingan_no_Kakashi5243d ago

I was hoping it would be announced this year but seeing as how they need to draw focus to the vita this year I doubt they'll hamper that by shifting focus to the ps4. Guess it won't be coming out til 2014. They could announce it late in the year but not at E3.

Abdou235243d ago

I'm sure both consoles will come out next year.

BlmThug5243d ago

Announcement early 2013 and release late 2013/ early 2014?

Show all comments (13)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
28d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted27d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8527d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele27d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla26d ago (Edited 26d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk26d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay26d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 26d ago
Athlon10127d ago (Edited 27d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit26d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg26d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10126d ago (Edited 26d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14927d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
40d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_40d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle40d ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker40d ago (Edited 40d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit40d ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog40d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_40d ago (Edited 40d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog40d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad40d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_40d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage40d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda40d ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

40d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
40°

Sony Shows Off 20 Minutes of Crimson Desert on a Base PS5

Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
BlazedKong66d ago

looks god awful on the base systems