All Channels
Popular
200°

Is Microsoft Going to Copy the Wii U?

Last year at e3 2011 Nintendo unveiled their next home console, the Wii U. Nintendo made the first strike in the next gen war, and they once again are hoping to win market share by introducing a new way to play. The current generation was the first to be introduced to motion controls, and eventually the competition made their own motion control schemes, to compete with Nintendo. With CES upon us, and Windows 8 tablet likely to be unveiled in full it begs the question if Microsoft will have their own tablet controller for the Xbox 720.

fluffydelusions5256d ago

Copying is the best form of flattery...well that is what they say...

GribbleGrunger5256d ago

for what's been copied, yes, but not for the copier.

morkendo235256d ago

old saying: if u cant beat em join em

dedicatedtogamers5256d ago

If Microsoft copies the Wii U, it will pave the way for Sony (or perhaps another outside non-gaming company) to become top dog again.

Mark my words: the Wii U is going to be a flash in the pan. Nintendo themselves ALREADY admitted "Wii U will not sell like the Wii". Hahah! The system isn't even out yet and they're accepting failure. There are a whole host of problems with the Wii U's design and philosophy, and if Microsoft copies it...

...well, two things: first, they're sink deeper into their "casual" hole they began digging with Kinect. Second, they'll lose marketshare, since Nintendo and Microsoft will be fighting over the "console/tablet crossbreed" market while Sony will likely continue catering to the traditional gamer.

--Onilink--5256d ago

mmm it would be foolish to think before time the Wii U will sell more, considering the incredible sales the Wii had.

Thats like saying the PS3 was a "flash in the pan" because the PS2 did WAY better...

dedicatedtogamers5256d ago

First things first, Nintendo THEMSELVES admitted that the Wii U would sell less than the Wii. It's quoted in the Game Informer magazine that did coverage on the E3 reveal, and I'm sure the quote is elsewhere.

Second of all, how in the world will the Wii U appeal to the masses that bought the Wii? It will likely be much more expensive than $250 (the Wii's launch price) and I can guarantee you that the Wii U controllers won't be the standard $50-55 price.

GribbleGrunger5256d ago

no it isn't. Nintendo did say what the poster above put up and the Wii-U isn't as kid friendly as the Wii. that controller isn't exactly small and it's as far as you can possibly get from the Wii. i think Nintendo have gone this direction because Sony have already released what you would consider the Wii2 with MOVE. the problem will arise again if Sony push for developers to make Wii-u games available on the Vita/PS3 combo. the advantage here is Sony's because there are already 60 million potential customers that would be able to get that experience cheaper simply by buying a Vita. the Wii-u will not be as cheap as a Vita we know that

--Onilink--5256d ago

yeah, they admitted it because it makes every sense in the world to do it, for the reasons you say, and probably more.

Just because they prefer to have a reserved opinion instead of assuming something so unlikely to happen, doesnt mean anything as to the quality of the product.

Again, it would be like saying that if MS says that they expect the next Xbox to sell about the same as the 360, then the console wouldnt be worth it...

And just because the Wii U sells less than the Wii would hardly make it a failure, otherwise every single Sony console would be a failure from now on, because its practically impossible on the current market for them to expect the type of succees they had with the PS2

ChickeyCantor5256d ago (Edited 5256d ago )

@GribbleGrunger

Not entirely true.
While Sony is able to give an experience "alike". It's not really the same thing.

I don't think Nintendo is worried on that front.
Wii-U is rather dedicated. Else the Move would have made a huge impact on Nintendo and it didn't.

( and 250 for a vita just to play some games that support such feature, is not entirely "cheaper" is it? )

@dedicatedtogamers
No company is going to admit that their product is going to sell terrible before it's even out.
Your logic just crumbles with every word.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5256d ago
lionelglitchy5256d ago

"mark my words" who are you patcher in disguise

4logpc5256d ago

with the tablet craze, you never know. If they advertise it as a tablet from nintendo with mario...that could be big

dedicatedtogamers5256d ago

I don't buy into the "tablet craze". More like a "tablet slow burn". Tablets are popular, but not THAT popular. It's the mobile phones that are popular. Am I the only one who remembers iPad's launch? It was a fart, especially compared to the iPhone sales. Tablets still haven't taken off like the smartphones have.

4logpc5256d ago (Edited 5256d ago )

That is true, but it took smart phones awhile to take off. I used to work retail and I cant tell you, people want tablets, but they are not willing to pay the 400-500 dollar price. once they come down, people will go crazy (hp touchpad)

xCaptainAmazing5256d ago (Edited 5256d ago )

Then the third man should take note and do the same. Odd man out is never a good idea from a development standpoint.

Regardless of whether or not you're on board with the concept, if two systems had the same controller they'd be more likely to get the most development consideration because of identical design and simple porting (depending on architecture of course).

yabhero5256d ago

If WiiU sells 85 million in its lifetime that would be amazing and not failure. However it is still 5 million less than the Wii. THE WIIU IS NOT APPEALING TO CASUALS. It's trying to be an all around system. Like app store and movies and stuff for casuals. Steam powered online and HD 2010 graphics. This Sony traditional gamer crap is pissing me off. The truth is a real gamer will go where the games are. Since WiiU will have the games gamers had to abandon for a better all around experience (like Mario and Zelda)with awesome graphics. Plus have games like Assassins creed, Batman, Cod, BF, Final fantasy,Elder Scrolls, Resident Evil REAL gamers will flock to the system. I'm seriously sick on people who want the same controllers as 1995... seriously. PPl say the WiiU is comfy and all the button are in reach. instead of being like " now creating dualshock 56... it plays the same a dual shock 3)

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5256d ago
Shackdaddy8365256d ago (Edited 5256d ago )

It's going to eventually be copied one way or another.

gaming system + pad-type device + culture infused with ipads and kindles and apps = big $

camel_toad5256d ago (Edited 5256d ago )

I really wish a console would finally break out with some VR. Forget 3D and forget swinging over the screen of a golfball on a tablet lying on the floor, I want to be IN my games.

AtomicGerbil5256d ago

"The current generation was the first to be introduced to motion controls" ??????

Pikajew5256d ago

That says the guy started gaming this gen

Show all comments (28)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai32d ago (Edited 32d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio32d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing31d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9232d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit32d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing31d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9231d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay33d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn234d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers34d ago (Edited 34d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn233d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown34d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos34d ago (Edited 34d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay33d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay33d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac33d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger34d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300034d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde34d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood34d ago (Edited 34d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde33d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)
50°

'The big things that we're thinking about'

In an exclusive interview with Game File, new(ish) Xbox boss Asha Sharma and Xbox chief content officer Matt Booty explain their vision for Microsoft’s gaming division

Read Full Story >>
gamefile.news
Agent7535d ago

A good start would be to release games to go with the console. My Xbox Series X has gathered dust virtually from launch. My advice would be to ditch a next console and release games on PC, PlayStation and Switch. Another idea would be a hybrid console based on Xbox Series X tech and go the same route as Nintendo. Another idea would be to pull out of gaming altogether. Plenty of options there.

Reaper22_33d ago

Why would they pull out? They have the momentum. Sony has been getting nothing but bad news lately.