
"So I've been looking at this ongoing battle of Battlefield 3 vs. Modern Warfare 3, and I've actually started to notice a trend. Pretty much every reason presented by the Battlefield players (destructible environments, objective based gameplay, vehicles, ect) were all, ironically enough, things I preferred about Modern Warfare 3.
And that's when it hit me. The key word being PREFERRED." - Redhead Reviews

Battlefield 3's former Lead Designer has revealed that there were two cut missions from the main campaign
Get rid of campaigns, move the game to mobile, and try to compete with warzone. They would save time and money.
Free for Playstation owners

Players are using hacks to gain an advantage in the game, such as aimbots and wall hacks. The first gives a player superhuman aiming abilities, while a wall hack lets you see through walls to gauge where other players are.
“These hacks are typically used by PC players, but those playing on PC via Xbox Game Pass are identified as Xbox players in multiplayer lobbies.”
This is pretty dumb to say the least.
Don't Gamepass online games have anti-cheat systems?
If not, that's pretty dumb. Microsoft need to fix that asap.
I mean, COD games was always filled with hackers, nothing new. I can’t blame MS on this. Activision had years to try and fix this. Might take MS some time to make some change.
A game can be "inferior" to another yet people will still prefer to play that "inferior" game due to the fact that their friends and playing it and they are good at it.
(In no way am I stating COD is inferior to BF or the other way around, so back off trolls)
Sorry, but this article has it wrong. If you prefer something, that means it is better in your mind. How can you prefer something that is inferior? I prefer BF3 because I think it is better than MW3. In my view, it has better MP, gameplay, graphics and sound. So, how can I say I prefer BF3, but MW3 is better? It doesn't make any sense. If I prefer BF3, then it has to be better to me, or why waste time playing it?