"This tech is only available on the PS3??"

WRONG!!

This tech is only available on the PC. Yes, the PS3 can play them but you have to BUY TWO VERSIONS OF THE GAME.

Mark Rein: PS3 owner, please bent over.

PS3 Owner: Sure, no problem. May I have another.

And of course you better have a very fast PC to create these MOD's and then run them.

And yes you will be able to use them on the 360 as well when the game ships. How many times does Mark Rein have to say they are working with MS to make this happen. Still, enjoy this game PS3 owners you get a nice treat months ahead of the 360. I'm skipping it.

EDIT: @6.1 and 6.2 Please read this article, they are talking about challenging PS3 owners to make their own levels and learn Unreal. You can't do this on the PS3, only on the PC. But yes, you can download them for free and play them on the PS3. But this article is more about designing then just free-loading off the hard work of PC mod makers.

@6.3 - $120.00 for UT3 and the mod tools?? I am new to gaming because I don't drop stupid amounts of money on one game?? You buy 2 versions of games?? Wow, I guess I'm not as "smart" as you are.. LOL

ready people, cause my Levels are gonna knock the sh!t out of every single one of yous... GARAN-FOCKING-TEED!!!

I can't wait for the first DBZ game to be made using the UE3. I remember playing some of the Bid for Power games on the old UE and it was sweet 1000 times better then any current dbz game made. They had online battles and it was great. I can't wait this is going to be sweet, the PS3 will get Halo after someone makes it using this. That will be funny when it plays better then the real thing.

Nah... ive went off this. I might wait for the 360 version?

I've been looking forward to this game and the mods really excite me can't wait to see some of the stuff people to decide to create so i can DL it to my ps3. With UT3,R:FoM,Warhawk and CoD4 among others free online gaming is going to be keeping me busy for a longtime.

This will be a nice addition to my PS3 collection

I bought the PC UT3 and just paid off the PS3 version. I needed to do so anyway for modding and mod testing, we've been working on some stuff for a few weeks now and I can't wait. I wonder where those two asshats are that bet me we'd have to pay for mods last month. I so love being right.

Seriously I thought I was getting new news here. When I first started reading this I thought that PS3 owners were going to get the ability to mod directly on the PS3. This article states nothing we didn't know already for months.

Oh wells...buying this game the day it drops! See ya'll online! Beware of the Flak Cannon!

Btw, my name here is my PSN name. Dueces.

I can smell your flesh burning with the rage and envy inside of because of UT3 for the PS3. It sort of makes your Halo 2.5 look like even more crap huh. Just the thought of UT3 running on the PleaseFixMe gives all the PleaseFixMe's the RROD.
AHAHAHA

PLAY B3YOND

What's stopping ANY company from using mods on any of their games on PSN.

It would double the replay value of the product a lot!

USE , DONT ABUSE.

I do envy PS3 owners for their ability to fully exploit the mod capabilities of UT3...c'mon, MS, get on the boat!!!

I had a BLAST modding Quake maps...imagine the potential for Halo or BioShock-themed mods on the 360...

Limitless possibilities....if only MS will get (un)real!

no UE editor in the PS3 version?

except you need to buy 2 versions of the game, the ps3 version and the pc version.

YOU CANNOT Make mods on the ps3, (linux installs aren't known yet) you have to buy UT3 on pc to get UE3....so its not only possible on the ps3 its possble on the pc, Oh and she says FOR now...and shes right microsoft is working with epic to work on a way to make this DLC work, and we know they will.

And to the people that keep talking as if they know any thing, There is nothing wrong with the download service...ect Its EPIC that has the problem with the Certification program for DLC they want to allow users to create content and then just put it up no checking for quality, and no checking to see if it will crash games, It was easy to make maps on the old UT games that once loaded and played crashed your system.

"Right now, this tech is only available on the PS3 console, so this is my challenge to you, PS3 owners! Create the next big thing! Completely change the world of gaming as we know it! We can’t wait to see what you come up with."

...you just have to buy the PC version to create them.... d'oh!

Why would you want to play it on ps3? If you have a beefy pc which can do the modding and testing of the game then why get it for ps3. PC has better online, lots more mods and updates and better graphics etc.

Edit: I'm sure UT3 is not as system heavy as crysis and Cod4. Most systems would be able to run it fine. I will probably go for pc version. The 9xxx series cards are due in Feb 08 as well so lets see how those cards perform. But to get the best experience i still think pc is the way to go.

what a surprise . a lot of people are asshurt that they are not getting it this year.

I believe that modding does prolong the life of a game. I have never played Unreal on PS..But I have played all Console versions even Dreamcast...So the potential to create your own maps for your friends to play and everyone else in the world....How cool is that..again its a win-win for ever one.....because maybe others Devs. will follow suit and maybe Microsoft may open up there system a little...or force MS to do something very similar....

Great news....way to build momentum going into 2008 Sony keep up the good work.

Once there is a good mod, PS3ers will be able to download it without a problem.

Thats it.

I hate motion blur, whenever DF would say a version was better because of motion blur I always rolled my eyes because motion blur is not a defining element to me and I don’t feel like any game has emplemented it in a good way

I like it overall it helps convey speed better imo. But in multiplayer it can prevent you from seeing your enemy correctly.
However single player motion blur all the way

I don't like motion blur. It gets turned off when the option is available

The issue with motion blur is the implementation of the feature is based on a misperception of the human senses. We experience motion blur all the time in our everyday lives as we turn our head and look around. But the reality is we are unaware it is occurring. In games they have made the sensation overt and thus it is unrealistic. To many people it is annoying and for a few, sickening.

The same is partially true with headbob. In actuality, it occurs to varying degrees depending upon things as gait, skeletal structure, etc. But as we matured our brains rapidly developed compensation mechanisms such as your eye rotation almost imperceptibly up and down. They have made the sensation overt in many games and depending upon how it is instituted it can provide an unrealistic experience for the gamer.

It can be a good thing in 30 fps titles

Motion blur is annoying and interferes with my ability to play FPS. I expect to be able to see things as clearly as my eyes allow me to, so stop adding distortions to the game that interfere with my ability to aim.

Developers thinking that motion blur adds anything to the experience are 100% WRONG and should stop it.

I turn it off whenever possible, and normally DoF too (but that depends on the game and how well/badly it is implemented).

I always turn it down or off.

I always turn it off or set it to low if there is no off. My one major gripe about SoD2 is the motion blur and I really hope they patch in the option to turn it off.

I'm not a big fan of all those effects either if possible the first thing that is turned off is motion blur...

I also don't like lens glare especially in a game that is first person view..... for me it often breaks the immersion.....

why is there lens glare in a game world with no cameras? I wear glasses and lighting does not reflect that dramatic even if the excuse was a visor or glasses..........
In a game that could justify or make sense of lens glare, I still find that game developers have overly done/over intensified the lens glare/flare and it just becomes a distraction..........

Someone above mention depth of field.... Now that one if done correctly, I can handle but I still want the option to turn it off or adjust the intensity in game if the dev/pub over does it (and depth of field is often over done) for whatever game...........

Maybe devs just need to tone all effects back just a bit (probably worse now with HDR ha!) haven't updated my set still enjoying my Plasma TV I have had for a few years still got inky blacks/fantastic contrast and color :-)

I hate motion blur with a passion and I always turn it off.

Cant stand it one of the first setting's i mess with soon as a set up a new game.

Need to scale it back a bit also the bloom is getting too much in some games , never get sick of depth of field effect though .

Not to be downer, but let's be real here. Doom will have some pre launch hype by it's fans who miss 'the glory days of shooters' but it will fizzle out quick within a month.

I'm not underestimating how popular this series is, it's just a different beast now, compared to back then. Now doom doesn't have to be this mega hit, but websites will be putting articles out trying to hype it up as if it will (or should be) because they are personal not into games like call of duty, which in return they know will get them a lot of support from people who also don't like it.

It just seems like websites have a standard 'hook em in' strategy book on how to present a article so gamers feed on it, now I know technically they have to do it to be successful, but I guess being on N4G this long I start seeing a pattern of familiarity with all the articles popping up daily.

Doom looks awesome and will be a must buy for me. But calling it the best fps seen in years is a stretch. Especially since the game is not out yet. Let's not get ahead of ourselves. High expectations is a killer.

I've heard allot of Good things about the original. can someone explain what will set this apart from every other fps out? For example battlefield's things are large maps destruction and vehicles, cod's are "solid" multiplayer and zombies. Are there any features thats gonna make DOOM the "best first person shooter we've seen in ages"?

Its my next buy for sure...i miss the frantic gore gameplay of the old doom...

One of the first games I've every played was DOOM, so I'm probably going to pick up a copy on release! Really hope it doesn't disappoint.

Maybe if you're a Destiny hater.

Not to take away from Doom, but if we're simply talking about combat, Destiny is so much more dynamic. Say what you will about content droughts and "non-existent story," but at least acknowledge that Destiny's gameplay is second to none.

The day a Destiny experience runs at 60 frames is the day it will be the greatest first person shooter gameplay of all time.

I'm keeping my eye on Overwatch, though.

Please don't disagree mob me for liking Destiny, I'm sorry guys! *shields face*

I 100% agree with the headline which is why I have this bad boy preordered :3

Looks good . best shooter ive played in years is Wolfenstein The New Order. Way better than any COD.