All Channels
Popular

BioShock Q&A

Shacknews.com's David Craddockhad had the chance to interview Ken Levine, Creative Director and President of Irrational Games, to learn more about this promising title.

Read Full Story >>
shacknews.com
Dusk7181d ago

The bottom of the article states that Bioshock is due out for the PC and 360. Is there actually a PS3 version or is that just a rumor?

USMChardcharger7180d ago

i was just about to point out the same thing...here it is:

"BioShock is due out in 2007 for PC and Xbox 360"

there web site (unless i missed it) fails to mention PS3 as well.

TheMART7180d ago

I hate to spoil the PS3 party, but only a PS magazine said:

"It will be confirmed for PS3, trust us".

With no proof, no link. No source, nothing.

THere has been no other confirmation. On the website of 2kGames there is still only PC and 360 mentioned.

Don't get me wrong, it could well be on PS3, like Assassins Creed is on 360. But it's still not announced in any form or hard evidence.

bambam19017180d ago

Go to gamespot.com. There is a preview with screenshots from the PS3 version. I submitted this yesterday, but it was rejected I suppose. Not sure why you're in such denial. Just another great game for PS3/360/PC owners to enjoy.

bambam19017180d ago

I could actually be mistaken if those are in fact 360 shots. Doesn't matter to me. I'll be happy to get the 360 version if it doesn't come out for PS3.

JIN KAZAMA 1877180d ago

Assasins Creed was "only" on the PS3, but everyone knew it was commin to the 360 as well. Its only a matter of time before this gets official for the PS3.

TheMART7180d ago

Few difference Jin, just a few.

Assassins Creed was already announced for 360 @ X05 in Amsterdam as Project Assassin.

You keep forgetting that every time. It's not like every game from a 3rd party developper will come to all platforms.

And the PS3 has the disadvantage here for the coming time with games. It has no userbase yet or a very small one (like 500k at the end of this year), while the 360 has 10 million users at the time the PS3 will launch.

Furthermore, we all know Ubisoft is main supplier for 360, 2kGames isn't main supplier for PS3.

So many differences. Assassins Creed is a whole other story and you know it.

kmis877180d ago

While not confirmed for ps3 numerous sources have indicated that it might be. If you go to the wikipedia article on bioshock, it gives a link to an upcoming Official Playstation Magazine article that says bioshock will be on the ps3, and it says Gamespot has said a ps3 version is coming. Of course you can still doubt it, but i think i'm leaning towards believing it will be on a ps3.

TheMART7180d ago

Again, here it is:

only a PS magazine said:

"It will be confirmed for PS3, trust us".

With no proof, no link. No source, nothing.

THere has been no other confirmation. On the website of 2kGames there is still only PC and 360 mentioned.

If you say numerous sources indicated something, give the exact links to the different sources please.

There is just one and I've just written that down for you. If you leaning towards believing doesn't matter. What the facts are matters

kmis877180d ago

I just got my sources from wikipedia which said some sources and specifically listed OPM and Gamespot which I said in my post.

TheMART7180d ago

Wikipedia contains more things that ain't true or correct.

So?

Still haven't seen more then those scans of Sony reporters saying it will be on PS3 and we should trust them.

Anything close to or related to Sony is not trustworthy, they're constantly pulling 'a Sony' on us all

kmis877180d ago (Edited 7180d ago )

I never said it was confirmed, i said some people have said it will come and i'm leaning towards an eventual ps3 release. Then you just start going on about how Sony lies, and I'm wondering how my comment on what I believe might happens causes you to go off like this. Personally, I care a lot more about what some magazine reporters, who would probably catch a bunch of sh** from a developer if they ran some random erroneous article with no proof behind it, have to say than some d*****bag like you who spends more time complaining about sony than playing his 360.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 7180d ago
Show all comments (31)
120°

Next ‘BioShock’ Game Changes Leaders After Development Turmoil

The fourth game in the ‘BioShock’ series has been in development for more than a decade

Read Full Story >>
bloomberg.com
toxic-inferno284d ago

Bioshock is one of my favourites franchises. I love all 3 games and have played each several times. I even have a room in my house that is loosely decorated around the theme of Bioshock (with a Lighthouse, coral models and postcards styled as though they are from both Rapture and Columbus).

And yet I am going to find it extremely difficult to get even remotely excited about any future episode in the series after all the problems this has had in its development cycle.

Leave the franchise alone. Remaster them again if you have to. Then put whatever talent you have to use on something brand new.

Furesis284d ago

Since ken levine isn't involved i'm not surprised what's going on. i'm more excited for his next game which looks like bioshock. Yet he still works under take2 and they are making bioshock 4 without him, strange situation.

toxic-inferno283d ago

Yes. Judas. Looks brilliant, but it's one of those games that seems to never have had a release date. Instead it's had release windows that keep getting pushed back.

Once it's ready, I'll be there for it though. Ken Levine is an excellent developer.

I get the feeling he dissolved Irrational Games simply so that 2k couldn't tell him what to do. It seems it will pay off, but I feel sorry for those who worked as part of Irrational before it was dissolved, who hadn't independently made a name for themselves.

ActualWhiteMan283d ago

He didn’t even want to make 2, that’s why they did it without him.

Rebel_Scum283d ago

tbh it wouldnt be a Bioshock game without development hell. They all had it.

Michiel1989283d ago

bioshock 2 was 2.5 years after 1, so much of a development hell it was......

-Foxtrot283d ago

"Remaster them again if you have to"

Well apparently they were doing a remake but that got cancelled

Relientk77283d ago

It sucks this game is in development hell because I love BioShock and would love a 4th game. I hope it turns out great, but I guess we'll see.

P_Bomb283d ago

Love Bioshock. It’s too bad what’s going on. At least we have Judas.

Yui_Suzumiya283d ago (Edited 283d ago )

It's been in development hell since 2014. This is nothing new. It saddens me because it's one of my favorite series. At this point, Judas may end up releasing first.

BABI-PANGPANG283d ago

Bioshock 4 (if it ever comes out) will probably still look and play like a Bioshock game, but without Kevin, it might miss that spark that made the originals so special. Honestly, Judas might end up feeling more like the real spiritual successor.

50°

Steam Deck Users Delighted as BioShock Remastered Can Be Downloaded for Free with Prime

Learn where you can get BioShock Remastered for free and enjoy playing it on your devices, including the Steam Deck.

130°

Netflix's BioShock Film Still In Development But With A Reduced Budget

Console Creatures writes, "The BioShock film at Netflix is still happening but with a reduced budget."

Read Full Story >>
consolecreatures.com
just_looken654d ago

Remember there past attempts at game based show's i do heck i still remember that teenage resident evil trash fire.

anast654d ago

ha. I almost forgot about that.

Jin_Sakai656d ago

Might as well just cancel it.

just_looken654d ago

Unless its batwoman were they right it off

porkChop656d ago

It's 10 years too late for a BioShock film. The world of Rapture would have been perfect for a film. It's actually a good candidate for proper utilization of 3D, for increased depth rather than bullshit popping out of the screen. It could really show off the underwater city that way. But BioShock as a brand is so irrelevant these days that a film just doesn't make sense. Especially considering it would need a big budget and top notch effects to really take advantage of the IP.

gold_drake656d ago

i agree on the bigger budget. all the cgi they'd need for the background.

but i think it would work better as a show. a movie would be too short to establish the story

TheNamelessOne656d ago

Netflix greenlights anything, so that shows me very little faith in the project. Enough to just crap something out as they're, more and more, known to do.

badkolo655d ago

its where b movies go to live, its run by democrats , dont expect anything good from netflix

Knightofelemia656d ago (Edited 656d ago )

I'll laugh if it turns out to be better then the Borderlands movie

Show all comments (14)