All Channels
Popular
110°

Is Multiplayer a necessary component of games?

Mass Effect 3, Bioshock 2, Dead Space 2... what is the thing that all these have in common? They're all AAA titles, yes, but they're also all (mostly) Singleplayer titles. Until those games, actually. All three of those games added in a Multiplayer mode, and while Mass Effect 3 isn't here yet, the track record for the quality of the Multiplayer isn't looking very good. Dead Space 2 and Bioshock 2 were great games, but in a way the Multiplayer felt tacked on. Unlike a game like Modern Warfare 3, Halo: Reach, or Battlefield 3, the main focus in these games was the Singleplayer, and their original titles didn't even have a Multiplayer mode. So, why include it in the sequel?

Continue reading on Examiner.com Is having Multiplayer a necessary component of games? - National Video Game Industry | Examiner.com http://www.examiner.com/vid...

Read Full Story >>
examiner.com
Wintersun6165323d ago (Edited 5323d ago )

I prefer singleplayer over multiplayer, but I think that multiplayer is becoming more and more important nowadays. And regardless of my personal preference, I have nothing against it as long as I keep getting deep singleplayer adventures and stories too.

But IMO multiplayer isn't a necessity in all games, especially if it's shoehorned in just to have it, because most other games have it too.

WANNAGETHIGH5322d ago (Edited 5322d ago )

I do like single player but its not what I care of the most,**Goes back to playing Cod.KILLCONFIRMED** :)

JoelR5322d ago

It's important if and only if it does not detract from the experience that the game is made to generate.If it is a adventure game multiplayer is probably a waste if it feels tacked on. I like Single Player best but many of the games I worked on have multiplayer aspects and thus we add multiplayer. Function should follow form in the case of single player vs multiplayer.

Cosmit5321d ago

Well I wouldn't buy CoD or BF without it.

Show all comments (9)
120°

Next ‘BioShock’ Game Changes Leaders After Development Turmoil

The fourth game in the ‘BioShock’ series has been in development for more than a decade

Read Full Story >>
bloomberg.com
toxic-inferno322d ago

Bioshock is one of my favourites franchises. I love all 3 games and have played each several times. I even have a room in my house that is loosely decorated around the theme of Bioshock (with a Lighthouse, coral models and postcards styled as though they are from both Rapture and Columbus).

And yet I am going to find it extremely difficult to get even remotely excited about any future episode in the series after all the problems this has had in its development cycle.

Leave the franchise alone. Remaster them again if you have to. Then put whatever talent you have to use on something brand new.

Furesis322d ago

Since ken levine isn't involved i'm not surprised what's going on. i'm more excited for his next game which looks like bioshock. Yet he still works under take2 and they are making bioshock 4 without him, strange situation.

toxic-inferno321d ago

Yes. Judas. Looks brilliant, but it's one of those games that seems to never have had a release date. Instead it's had release windows that keep getting pushed back.

Once it's ready, I'll be there for it though. Ken Levine is an excellent developer.

I get the feeling he dissolved Irrational Games simply so that 2k couldn't tell him what to do. It seems it will pay off, but I feel sorry for those who worked as part of Irrational before it was dissolved, who hadn't independently made a name for themselves.

ActualWhiteMan321d ago

He didn’t even want to make 2, that’s why they did it without him.

Rebel_Scum321d ago

tbh it wouldnt be a Bioshock game without development hell. They all had it.

Michiel1989321d ago

bioshock 2 was 2.5 years after 1, so much of a development hell it was......

-Foxtrot321d ago

"Remaster them again if you have to"

Well apparently they were doing a remake but that got cancelled

Relientk77321d ago

It sucks this game is in development hell because I love BioShock and would love a 4th game. I hope it turns out great, but I guess we'll see.

P_Bomb321d ago

Love Bioshock. It’s too bad what’s going on. At least we have Judas.

Yui_Suzumiya321d ago (Edited 321d ago )

It's been in development hell since 2014. This is nothing new. It saddens me because it's one of my favorite series. At this point, Judas may end up releasing first.

BABI-PANGPANG321d ago

Bioshock 4 (if it ever comes out) will probably still look and play like a Bioshock game, but without Kevin, it might miss that spark that made the originals so special. Honestly, Judas might end up feeling more like the real spiritual successor.

80°

Battlefield 3 Cut Missions From Campaign Detailed by Former DICE Dev

Battlefield 3's former Lead Designer has revealed that there were two cut missions from the main campaign

XiNatsuDragnel528d ago

I wish someone can get those EA game leaks to see all the cut content ngl

anast527d ago

Get rid of campaigns, move the game to mobile, and try to compete with warzone. They would save time and money.

Johnh5223527d ago (Edited 527d ago )

Bf4 was fun hope the new bf is just as good.

50°

Steam Deck Users Delighted as BioShock Remastered Can Be Downloaded for Free with Prime

Learn where you can get BioShock Remastered for free and enjoy playing it on your devices, including the Steam Deck.