470°

IGN: Five Developers Microsoft Should Buy

It's always a big deal when a major videogames publisher cherry-picks another independent studio from the wild, and Microsoft is known for some of the biggest and most controversial purchases in the industry. It swiped Halo from under Apple's nose to make it a timed exclusive for its debut Xbox console, it bought Nintendo's golden boy Rareware, and it dished out megabucks for Lionhead, employing renowned designer Peter Molyneux as creative director of Microsoft Game Studios.

Read Full Story >>
uk.xbox360.ign.com
Pikajew5200d ago (Edited 5200d ago )

IGN just got a whole lot more stupid
The only devs the MS should buy are the ones that make games for them mostly.

Grasshopper Manufacture makes multiplatform games mostly and they made more games on Sony and Nintendo systems than MS systems. So they will never go to MS

Insomniac Games only made Sony exclusives and is making their first multiplatform game they will never go to MS.

And if anyone gets Turtle Rock Studios it should be Valve

Whats next, IGN? Nintendo buys Epic and Sony buys Mojang?

Pacman3215200d ago

That would be epic if Nintendo buys Epic.

buddymagoo5200d ago

Knowing Microsofts past history with buying studios, I would hope they don't buy any.

ApplEaglElephant5200d ago (Edited 5200d ago )

If MS buys them, they will make exclusives for MS. cause ya know... MS will own them.

But we all know MS wont buy any hardcore studios. All the did was opposite. They gutted down studios. Canceled contracts. Bought Kinect studios. Converted studios to make kinect games.

yea..

SilentNegotiator5200d ago (Edited 5200d ago )

@buddymagoo
Agreed.

"Double Fine Productions"
*Vomits in mouth*
They already took RARE and shoveled Xbox Live/online gameplay and Kinect down their throats...it would be horrifying if they did that again with DF.

"Insomniac Games"
.....right, because they're obviously dying to be tied down and completely done with independence after releasing all 0 games with EA so far. /s

"Turtle Rock Studios
Games: Counter-Strike Source, Left 4 Dead"
So, the guys who ported counter-strike to xbox1 and co-created L4D? That's not really much of a rap sheet to go out and buy them.

nveenio5200d ago (Edited 5200d ago )

Microsoft can keep their grubby little paws off the devs as far as I'm concerned. They should stick to hardware and keeping Live in its prime. Good third-party developers will come naturally.

caseh5200d ago

@Pacman

That would be a horrible move if Nintendo owned Epic, not knocking Nintendo but their hardware hardly pushes the boundaries of technical superiority. Can you imagine what Gears would have looked like on the Wii, urgh!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5200d ago
saladthieves5200d ago

Before shopping for any studios, they should put some of their studios to good use...I'm looking at you Rare.

coolbeans5200d ago

You should define the term "good use". When looking at sales figures, the Kinect Sports series has probably been Rare's most lucrative franchise since the N64 days. In terms of "hardcore aim" (if that makes any sense), I'd certainly like to see Banjo-Threeie :D.

BlmThug5200d ago

I would love another banjo game

princejb1345200d ago

i don't think well see another banjo game for a while, with the disappointing sales of the last one
if rare does make it they should go back to the roots, no need for a car

Rifkens5200d ago ShowReplies(2)
hqgamez5200d ago

If Nintendo got Epic. I would flip.
Reggie must of had a gun towards Epic's President.

Sony buying Mojang. I could see that, but doubt it.
If IGN was to post Sony buying Team Meat.
Then I would call IGN 100% PURE IGNorant! I'm currently at 90%

Pikajew5200d ago (Edited 5200d ago )

I lost the my little respect for them with this article.

enfestid5200d ago

Valve already bought Turtle Rock Studios. Didn't work out too well. They renamed them "Valve South" before closing them down and asking everyone to relocate to Seattle. Michael Booth then restarted Turtle Rock Studios back in California with some of the original staff (some moved to Seattle to continue working for Valve).

showtimefolks5200d ago

not gonna happen i have said the same thing many times but not these studios just some smaller studios and let them work on something for a few years, but each time i was told by xbox community which i am part of that MS is more than a game company they rather lock down dlc deals for millions than actually spend that money for their future consoles.

what MS has done with xbox360 is pure genius and success but i am not sure if next time around the fate wouldn't be a bit different. Early on MS's message was we are hardcore we know gaming and gamers but than MS became that we want to be in your living room while giving you halo,gears,forza etc every 2 years or so. Gears franchise if there are future games will be on all 3 HD consoles and maybe even VITA.

but what the heck do i know i am just a gamer

sony will buy QD next after their next game which won't be heavy rain 2

sony is letting a new studio work on SLY 4 so taht's now a 2nd party studio

and IGN thing is if insomniac fails with EA they would much rather go to sony than to MS

also ready at dawn studio should get to do a new IP for ps3 they have the talent

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5200d ago
NYC_Gamer5200d ago

i'd rather them build up some new studios

Tanir5200d ago

yeah, MS has no games and the reason why is because they dont have any studios, they r retarded

Noticeably_FAT5200d ago

Microsoft has never had a ton of first party exclusives, but they have scaled back more this past year because I feel like they are all looking and developing for the next Xbox already.

Game13a13y5200d ago

Yep, note to MS, MONEY CAN'T BUY EVERYTHING!

Disccordia5200d ago

MS started about 5 new studios a while back. Probably won't see any output until next gen though

360ICE5200d ago

Amen, Lionhead is their super studio!? Trying to go up against Nintendo EAD and Naughty Dog with eccentric Peter Molyneux is like going up against James Cameron with Tim Burton.

thehitman5200d ago

Yea exactly MS needs their own team(s) developing 3-4 games at a time dedicated to Xbox if they want to have a fighting chance next-gen. Even though they gave Sony a run for their money this gen Sony didnt stray from their gameplan they released lots of new AAA titles and acquired new studios at the same time increasing their porfolio. Now that Nintendo even looks like they want a piece of the 3rd party Pie MS are going to have an even harder time justifying their console purchase. XBL I think wont cut it anymore because I know Sony will bring their A game when it comes to online for the next playstation.

saladthieves5200d ago

They already have started to bring their A game, with especially the PS Vita.

I've been a PS+ user since it came out, and I can honestly say that it is pretty awesome. I've had to download lots of stuff at amazing discounts, and so much more, for free. I get so much bang for my buck, sometimes I feel that they are just throwing away stuff for free.

On the other hand Xbox Live compared to PS+ feels like it is not worth the price. It costs more but offers me far less. I've never had a free game, or content on Xbox Live, let alone EVERY MONTH. Microsoft would never make it happen, yet my PS3 is just piling up with them.

The only reason I pay for Xbox Live is to play online. Make playing online free and I'll cancel my gold subscription in a heartbeat, and I'm sure millions others would instantly.

So in terms of Sony being ready for next gen online, I say they've started already, especially if you look at the connectivity prowess included in the PS Vita.

moparful995200d ago

People try to play it off like xbox live is miles ahead of psn in terms of features, usability, and connectivity and honestly besides a few networking features and cosmetic differences xbox live and psn are dead even where it matters and thats playing games.. xbox live has x-game chat psn is free.. They are dead even.. Given the fact that the ps3's AAA exclusive portfolio is outpacing microsoft's by a large margin the only thing driving people to the 360 is the networking effect.. "My friends all play on the 360 so I want one"

beastgamer5200d ago

M$ been doing it wrong.
They invest in 3rd Party spending $$$ all day long. Who knows how much they pay Activison for 30 days dlc and each ad has their logo. If they paid Rockstar 50 million, who knows. For a greed copy and paste game that break records each year, Bobby must want some $$$ meaning 9digits figures.

I know MS had Bungie which are great developers, but Bungie left MS in 07, I guess they weren't having all the Hoopla.
I kind of feel Sorry for Turn 10 its like MS doesn't care about them, they just want them to beat Gran Turismo

saladthieves5200d ago

The problem with Microsoft is that they are relying on techniques, though proven to work, just happen to be short term solutions.

They are paying DLC exclusivity for 30 days, just so that their base can be the first to get it. This exclusivity isn't even for like a year, just 30 days! Their heavy reliance on mullti-plats is a problem they need to solve.

They could for example launch next gen and find that they have a very little list of exclusive games to go along with the platform. If they think that people will flock to their next Xbox because of their brand name instead of exclusive games then they could be very mistaken. Sony tried the same this gen and we all know how that turned out.

What they should be doing is building up a solid portfolio of exclusive list of games ready to launch for next gen. Kinect is all good and nice, but it shouldn't be their focus. Nintendo already proved that you can only ride the casual market for so long, until they get bored and move to something else (iPads, iPhones etc).

Sony learned from their mistake, and look at how many studios they now own, or the ones producing exclusive content solely for them. It's clear to them that they know a platform is as good as dead if it doesn't have games to play it on. They know what matters to gamers, the games.

DiRtY5200d ago

They opened three studios 6 months ago.

MS Soho
MS Vancouver
MS Family

gg no re.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5200d ago
theunleashed645200d ago

insomniac like their independence if they didn't want to be acquired by sony they certainly won't likely want to be bought up by microsoft.

The Meerkat5200d ago

They should have gone for Bioware.

Swiggins5200d ago

Probably would've been a better choice than Insomniac.

Ulf5200d ago

EA owns Bioware, and MS wouldn't be able to buy EA without a major stock revolt.

John Kratos5200d ago

@Ulf He meant when Microsoft was publishing Bioware's games.

Alos885200d ago

A big no to the first three, I don't care about the others.

Show all comments (77)
40°

Microsoft has revoked the DMCA takedown that forced an indie Minecraft-like off Steam

Microsoft claimed the indie game uses "Minecraft content."

90°

Microsoft Expects More Xbox Content and Services Revenue Decline Despite Game Pass Growth

During the conference call for Q2 of FY2026, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and CFO Amy Hood talked about the future of the xbox business.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
dveio18d ago

«partly offset by growth in Xbox Game Pass.»

I take it with a big grain of salt. They've been reporting nothing about GP, only words.

We still don't have any hardware numbers, no software units sold, no subscription numbers, no PC vs console GP, we don't have any profit numbers ... we literally have nothing but overall revenue and words.

Reaper22_18d ago

Does it really matter? Are you shareholder? Gamers have to stop acting like these companies owe us something. Its obvious everything is down. Thats completely normal in all businesses. It will be up and down again.

dveio18d ago

Yes, since they don't get tired spewing out word salad 12 months a year.

"Biggest launch", "millions of players", "growth of", "here look our revenue", "We buy ABK", "We'll bring you 1st party every quarter", "Biggest this, biggest that", "We always wanted to share games with everyone", "We're growing", "biggest launch", "millions of players", ... you get the point.

They either shut up.

Or deliver numbers like Nintendo, Playstation, hell even Tencent does.

On a sidenote:

Just years ago, Microsoft wanted to buy out a whole lot more than just Zenimax and ABK. They even wanted to push Sony out and collect Nintendo in.

You bet your butt I'm demanding numbers.

18d ago
Christopher18d ago (Edited 18d ago )

In an article discussing industry matters, telling people to not worry or want better information on the industry is antithesis to the whole point of it. I'm going to try this out with all those review articles. I mean, who cares about scores, just try it out for yourself, that's the only opinion that matters.

dveio18d ago

«In an article discussing industry matters, telling people to not worry or want better information on the industry is antithesis to the whole point of it.»

Well.

That's it.

Case closed!

Profchaos18d ago (Edited 18d ago )

He might be a shareholder you can get a etorro or whatever online platform about and throw 20 bucks into Microsoft boom shareholder

BehindTheRows18d ago (Edited 18d ago )

Yes, it matters. This is business! Some gamers have to stop acting like it only matters when the company they prefer wants to play ball.

Eonjay18d ago

The fact that shareholders are also in the dark im sure is also completely fine with you and Microsoft doesn't owe them anything either amirite? Not withstanding how silly and potentially inappropriate it is for someone to defend a public company from hiding sales information, you are also completely wrong.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 18d ago
dveio18d ago

@varora

Thank you.

For over 10 years we've been in those quarterly discussions.

Yet Nintendo and Playstation are the only manufacturers that deliver numbers, that deliver proof, that give us numerical baselines to either brag about or compliment them.

The only fraction that's been pulling doooozens of doooozens, hundreds and thousands of word salad bribberish comments out of their Xbox'clestotitis fan cloud is the die hard Xbox community.

And by doing that they're even defending that downward spiral Xbox is suffering from.

Bring the numbers buddies, or else just stfu.

Reaper22_18d ago

Nintendo and Playstation can deliver all the numbers they want. It doesnt matter much because hardware isn't the only way to make money in the industry. Maybe decades ago but not now. That's why you see sony putting more and more games on PC. They know its the games that keeps the money coming. Consoles stagnate but not the software.
The fact is that Microsoft was and is never gonna outsell them. The competition's console sales doesnt really affect Microsoft"s profit margin much if at all.. Look at how many more consoles sony sells and then go look at what they report in profit. The gap is nowhere near the gap in console sold. Hardware doesn't dictate market trends.

IRetrouk18d ago

Microsoft doesn't report xbox profit, so how can we compare them.......
Console sales lead to those software sales, thats not a theory its a fact, old days, these days... doesn't matter, one company is doing much better than the other, and thats partly because of said console sales...

rlow118d ago

I really think Call of Duty underperforming, the raise in subscription prices and Hoods ridiculous expectations of 30% return. Is what led to the lower numbers.

Reaper22_18d ago

Maybe, but COD sold 8 million on xbox which counted for 40% of the sales.

IRetrouk18d ago

Not even close to being true

BehindTheRows18d ago

Show us the article/sources with these sales numbers.

Chevalier18d ago

Could you show us the profit charts while you're at it? Would love to see this 'gap' you mentioned. Should be easy to show that right?

Eonjay18d ago

This whole report is confusing to me until I remember content and service are separate. Content went down... okay we get that because COD 'bombed' but Services went up because of the price increase which mitigated most of the lost from the cancelations. Okay got it.

I wouldn't blame the results on Amy but she sure as hell had unreasonable expectations.

GamePass has put Xbox in a bad position where the absolutely need PlayStation to make their numbers. So if a big game like COD bombs... they got a problem.

The fact that their service revenue (GamePass) can't drive growth on its own is a huge red flag. That was supposed to be the whole point.

18d ago Replies(1)
170°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 9% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 32%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q2 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming business.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
19d ago Replies(7)
1Victor18d ago (Edited 18d ago )

🚨🚓🎼 🎶 🎼 👇

raWfodog18d ago

I don't why people waste their time replying to the alt-account clown. Their comment is going to get flagged as spam as it always does and those comments (and all replies) will eventually disappear. Better to ignore them and carry on constructive debate with those not scared to post with a permanent account.

1Victor18d ago

@raW: “ I don't why people waste their time replying to the alt-account clown.”
He suffer from from keyboardrhrea and can’t wait the average month of clean posting to have a permanent account.

.
@taco: “ Funny that this website actually works again when there's prime opportunity to slam on Xbox.
LOL it's all admins ever give a shit about
The funny thing is that it’s at random at least for me, sometimes is working find and other times it doesn’t let me do anything even flag the spammers.
This isn’t a us vs them it’s a everyone is in the swamp up to the neck

Tacoboto18d ago

Funny that this website actually works again when there's prime opportunity to slam on Xbox.

LOL it's all admins ever give a shit about

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 18d ago
Outside_ofthe_Box19d ago

Pretty surprising on revenue and content being down. Obviously hardware being down is expected, but you'd think that the GamePass price hike, CoD, and things such horizon 5 coming to PS5 would drive things up. No wonder MS is all-in on the multiplat strategy, don't really have choice at this point. There might be another GP price hike this year.

SimulationDaily19d ago

COD is likely the issue. It appears BO7 is doing significantly worse than BO6. Game Pass is apparently growing, so the problem isn't there.

19d ago
SimulationDaily19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

@Varora: What you "hear" (from your uncle who works at Nintendo?) is irrelevant when the CFO of Microsoft says the opposite in the conference call.
Incidentally, "content and services" are down, not just services, which include Call of Duty. If you don't know how to interpret financials, don't try 😂

Edit: Oh wait... another troll account made 46 minutes ago. I really need to learn to check before engaging. 😂

19d ago
Kurt Russell18d ago

I noped my way out on the last price hike. Whilst Ultimate was convenient for a while being also able to Play on PC, it became too rich for my blood.

CrashMania19d ago

Wonder how the goalposts will be moved this time, it shifted from exclusives and console sales, to revenue, where now then.

Lightning7719d ago

No goal post. It was down last January also. Amy Hood predicted this was gonna happen. You gave us and downs, that's simply how it works.

ocelot0718d ago (Edited 18d ago )

Think it was down last January but I don't know why. There is probably a genuine reason for it.

DivineHand12519d ago

There is no incentive to buy into a closed ecosystem with no exclusives. I wish they would just make windows lite or steam os bootable on the Xbox so long time fans who still own the console can get some enjoyment.

Lightning7719d ago

Closed ecosystem? How's it closed?

__y2jb19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

All consoles are closed eco systems. This in itself is not a problem but a closed eco system without exclusives is pointless when there’s alternatives that have them.

NotoriousWhiz18d ago

That's why xbox's next (and final) "console" will actually be a PC.

Christopher18d ago

This is also why Microsoft has been marketing really hard for the elimination of exclusives in general. They are out of the console business and into publishing games and subscription services. They need exclusives to die so they can end the battle with console markets.

Lightning7718d ago

@yb it's games and services are are on PC, tablets, phones and TV's not just found on Console. Even it's games are on other systems.

It's not closed at all. It's games going everywhere is probably the worst idea MS did you're right about that.

Christopher18d ago

You do know that DivineHand is talking about the hardware losses, not the games, right? The hardware is a closed system. It has seen two digit declines each year for at least 3 years in a row.

derek19d ago

And Microsoft wants to release another super expensive console next gen? Bizzaro world economics over there. Phillip Bartholomew Spencer will be promoted on the strength of these loses. Lol

TriniOutsider19d ago

Their next console has to be released. I could only imagine how much R&D they've already put into their next platform.

derek19d ago

Sunk-cost fallacy in action.

__y2jb19d ago

Yes let’s release so we can lose even more money!

Eonjay18d ago

Its a PC.. I don't think they spent a lot of money to R&D the idea of releasing a prebuilt PC. And they are not subsidizing it so by that token I don't see any reason why they wouldn't release it unless they pivot from hardware altogether.

NotoriousWhiz18d ago

They're just releasing a PC. And they don't intend to subsidize the cost so it's going to priced like any other PC and probably expected to ship PC-like numbers and not the many millions that consoles sell. After that, they'll eventually go third party and xbox hardware will be a thing of the past. Sega says hi.

Show all comments (83)