I don't know if you've ever played black, but it looks like it is next-gen. It was an amazing game with massive levels.

PS2 // God of War!

Just think, PS2 was the weakest console last gen, and it can look like that?

The Wii is MUCH stronger than the PS2, and the 360 and PS3 are MUCH stronger than the Wii, so why do most games not look that good, still?

Develoeprs choose which controls to use.

I'm going old school with Brawl controls, myself.

Games can be made with mortion controls or not, but don't blame Nintendo if they're not...unless its a NIntendo game, of course.

Nights, is going to use both.
And allot of other games do use the GCN controller too.

Unless i'm mistaken you can get a regular controller for the console.

some games you can use the classic or the gamecube remote. I think some developers need to allow people to choose to play either way. Anyway I dont really understand the argument with most wii games about having to stand up or get tired playing. I have a broken foot and was on a couch for 2 months and played the wii almost the whole time. There were few games which just tired out my arms the main one being elebits damn that thing tired my arms out and to a much lessor extent trauma center.

Do your research, you stated this before.
The wii has 4 gamecube controller ports plus they could attach different hardware to the Wii-mote.

it will sell more? ( with this shortage?)
its designed for different controller inputs....so your statement is a bit off.

Well some positives are if you have parties at your house, the wii will most definitely be utilized. And if you like plumber, elf or female bounty hunter games it's for you. Also it's good if you have kids, and you play video games less than the average gamer.

Your missing the point of the article. The developer was saying that people are not even trying to get anything out of the wiis power. Yes its nothing compaired to the ps3 and 360, but it is about equal with the original xbox so we should be seeing some nice graphics. Afterall we werent exactly playing pong last generation were we?

Nintendo is not guilty of producing a machine which produces ugly graphics, it is not as powerfull as the competition this generation but far from the n64 or pso. Developers are guilty of it and so is nintendo with some games. Some developers see nintendo software sell really well when they dont put a terrible effort in the graphics so they figure why not do the same. Fire emblem to name a game looked underwhelming on the gamecube and still looks like it on wii. Dont get me wrong I really dont mind it but from another developers standpoint why do they have to be held to a differnt level? It is about the gameplay and that is where nintendo succedes but hey 3rd parties might be the most guilty of not trying but nintendo doesnt help their case all the time.

tittles? hahahaha

" Last gen are already well know for devs, they shall not really invest to innovate in it,"

...you are so wrong, "innovation" isn't by standard something great, its new alright but not by default GOOD.

now lets spend 10 times more on a game then they would pay for a Wii project and take the RISK that there is a possibility it wont sell.

Working for Wii equals minimum loss, and when its selling they are guaranteed with profits.

No sales for PS3/360 games = big loss of money, and of course IF it goes off the shelves there is a profit, but the risk was still attached.

WIIIIIII another retard,
the reason you think its a 1.25 is all explained in this article.
Devs don't take the power out of the Wii, they just keep it on REALLY low standards.

Let's actually have discussion, not flame wars...maybe you'll get your bubble back.