In a new video released today, you can see the visual difference between the ‘Texture Packed’ Battlefield 3 and the Non-Texture Packed Battlefield 3.

Battlefield 3's former Lead Designer has revealed that there were two cut missions from the main campaign
Get rid of campaigns, move the game to mobile, and try to compete with warzone. They would save time and money.

Whether it comes through remakes or a new game with a similar style, DICE should aim to revive the glory days of Battlefield 3 and Bad Company 2.
hmmm I think there will be no old BF glory days for EA since they are loyal to their greediness and laziness :D
You're asking for a miracle with EA that will never happen unless they can exploit the money making schemes behind it.

This Battlefield 3 Reality Mod installation guide will show you step-by-step on how to install the new reality mod by Venice Unleashed.
old
Wow amazing. They don't show long range shots. So maybe it only affects short range? But then again it is prob overall.
Lol looks better than CoD without the texture pack.
Wow, what a difference. Although the non-HD textures just looks UGLY!
One thing I noticed in the first set of M-Con stations in the beta was the stacked sand bags looked really bad, this texutre pack should make everything nice and sharp.
hey look it's a N64 game :D omg the no HD texture pack is horrible...
Wow! There are going to be alot of pissed 360 owners who don't have hard drives, lol. Oh well, ps3 all the way for me, dice is actually taking advantage of the ps3 architecture, so it will definitely look better than 360 version