well i didn't like AA combat that much which i talked about in the article and i give good reasons for that too. I guess i was expect AC to be much better instead of just new animations, which still you dont have any control over. You just hit 1 button and something happens, you have no control over a kick or a punch, a back hand or an upper cut. I got bored with AA combat and since theres nothing hugely different so far, im bored with AC combat. But it goes beyond that as well. its a sequel shouldn't we expect more than instead of the same stuff?

Everyone is entitled to their opinion. I'm not sure if I would agree or not since I haven't played the game, but I think he's trying to say he expected them to do a bit more with the combat than just repeat what they did before with a few new animations.

@antz1104 other games have done it without making it so simple. But the first few chapters were disappointing in terms of whats there but the story was good. Not sure if you read my article but i pointed out some of my concerns while still leaving hope.

Tut, tut... Don't you know that name-calling is childish? I mean, you ought to add some substance to your comment without being rude.

Anyway, I haven't played Arkham City yet. And while I did enjoy the combat system in AA and thought it was great, I'm sure that I'm not the only one who thinks that sequels should offer some variation from their predecessors' gameplay. They should offer something new and improved. TO show that the developer has found out how to make what worked in the first game even better.

He's not reviewing the game, just stating his opinion based on the first three hours. There's a big difference. Everyone can have an opinion, and who knows, by the time he finishes the game, he might say, "Hey, my first impression is wrong." Man.

Hey BigBacon87 learn to read....