yeah kinda weird but someone posted a comment at the bottom of that article saying about how you ranked up very quick in the beta which is a good point as I put in just over 13 hours and was already a rank 24 where as in BFBC2 i've clocked near enough 130 hours and am only a rank 26. Hopefully this was just the case in the beta jus so people playing would get a better felling for the game by unlocking stuff quicker.

SOFLAM basically is what the sniper has in BFBC2
binoculars to call in mortar strikes

Can't wait for this to hit. I'll be there at midnight launch.

Damn, I was deadly as Recon before, now I'll be unstoppable (I was top 100 in the world ;P) Though I doubt I'll be using the SOFLAM. I found the recon drone far too useful. And I never ever used the mortar in BC2. It seemed too noobish. I prefer getting up close and personal. None of this sniping from random corners of the map.

As for the progression system, it'll be different in the final release. I got up to level 45/46 in the beta and maxed out Recon completely. So it'll definitely be altered.

I wish that it wasn't just the support guy with claymores... I mean they don't have to worry about claymore whoring because you can crouch or prone past them... I definitely think it should take a little longer to level up... And i don't know about the sniping in this game... theres just too many goddamn people sniping... and to make it worse have of them have flashlights so when you shoot back you'll likely miss...

please dont let there be too many wookies :(

i love moving wookies, but the camping wookies are lame..

Why are they so reluctant to create a new Bad Company??

Definitely agree with the title. If they make Bad Company 3 then that would definitely be a step in the right direction!

It’s done. The current development team has no idea why people liked BF.

BF3? They need to go back to BF2 for the mainline. Heck, I'd settle for true-to-source remakes of BF2 and BC2 (w/ Vietnam). Everything they've done in the 'modern' era is just bad.

Doubt they will smh which is messed up

EAis pretending to be one of those deaf mutes

I've not played 2042 myself but after v I don't feel like it. I played a few hours of v with friends but it feels ultra sterile I can't figure it out but the game looks and feels clinical. The storys in the campaign were also bland and uninteresting and felt like a dull trudge through checkpoints as you waited for an ending.

I've played the franchise dating back to it's original PC launch and PS2 spin off games I did enjoy 1 overall and it's take on placing you in different scenarios and battles was interesting but not all that good imo as you couldn't really connect with any characters longer than 2 hours.

hardline for all the hate it recived was a fun story and a new take but a bad mp game

I feel like v overall was the turning point and instead of showing the gritty reality of war they turned everything sterile and presented it in a clean cut boring frame in order to pump it full of weird micro transactions overall they spent far to much time on trying to implant ray tracing and other graphical flourishes and forgot to make the game enjoyable

I mean thats all we've wanted since BF4 but they keep doing everything we don't want.