All Channels
Popular
120°

Sony To Lead Industry In Accepting Android Modification

GIR writes: Android is many things to many people, but as one of the most used operating systems on cell phones and tablets, it has led the way for some pretty cool games to , establishing itself as a mobile platform along side iOS. Now it would appear that there is to be fresh support for the people who prefer to modify the device and it’s software, giving themselves and us more freedom with what we do with our devices.

Read Full Story >>
gamingirresponsibly.com
agentxk5364d ago

This looks good for the Vita!

narutogameking5364d ago

The Vita doesn't use Android.
You can bet Sony won't support modifications to that. In fact, if you release a guide on how to hack it they might even sue you(right Geohot?)

smashcrashbash5364d ago

Geohot and friends stole and copied Sony's property to hack the system. It's not the same thing. Can't believe your STILL repeating that BS.

UltimateIdiot9115364d ago

It might not use Android but the PS Suite does support android development on it. Also, I'm not 100% on the details but I've read somewhere it plays android games.

SilentNegotiator5364d ago (Edited 5364d ago )

@Naruto

He used stolen, copy protected/trademarked codes to make the CFW. After pouting off into the sunset after failing to recreate Doc's device, he returned with chest pumped out because he "invented his own" flux capacitor after getting a hold of stolen schematics to a flux capacitor.

GeoNotz made a jerk out of himself and was proud as a mother when he was an accessory to theft.

Sony sued him for profiting from paypal "donations" (He even went on vacation meanwhile whining that he didn't have enough money to fight 'Teh BIG EVIL Soniez' corporation) and using their copywritten/trademarked technology.

nix5363d ago

geez naruto... get your facts right!

Ju5363d ago (Edited 5363d ago )

What has the Vita to do with Cyanogen? Doesn't run on the Vita. Pointless. I am sure by all the love of Sony for Cyanogen, they will hardly publish Vita's spec.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5363d ago
denero15364d ago

yeah sure geohot stole that's why Sony won in court case right. . . that's why geohot is now working for Facebook after stealing from a company ;) cause they love thieves

Godmars2905364d ago

The only thing I want from Sony and Google at this point is Google TV for the PS3. Even if its via an add-on.

TheIneffableBob5364d ago

I really doubt that would ever happen. The Cell architecture is different enough from ARM and x86 to make it a really large project. Also, I don't know if the PS3 has enough RAM. Pretty sure all Google TV devices have at least 1GB of RAM.

3GenGames5364d ago (Edited 5364d ago )

If you can't make something work in 1GB of RAM, you need WAY better programmers, as they probably really suck if they NEED more then that.

And yeah "the cell" isn't any different and doesn't work better, it's different, and guess what? Unoptimized compared to other things such as x86 and even already x64! Even though x86 was ancient and shty the day it became standard and has one of the worst bases of any processor in the 80's, it still is more accessible and usable than that thing called the cell. As it's not standard, it's not easy to program because compilers have NO optimizations and HAVE to be written in parallel. It's not going to be used ever again because of those. Plus it's proprietary and secret on how it works, why would Sony license it at all, and why would anybody use it if they have to pay MORE for it? Ha, what a joke. In fact, I'd wager they use a proprietary FPGA custom RISC made processor or even a PIC. A dedicated x86 processor? Too damn much. A ARM or FPGA are 1000x more likely. But yet, at the same time, computers are so fast it's irrelevant except for PC gaming that actually utilize most of the processor. A TV set wouldn't use 10% of any processor clocked at even 1Ghz. Another reason you won't need a 3.8Ghz AMD x64 quad core processor in your TV. It doesn't need it. And never will, as the TV's are cool and useful, but won't ever be an actual computer.

morganfell5363d ago (Edited 5363d ago )

3Gen,

While I agree with the first part of your comment, the second part is only true if it is qualified. And yours was not.

Compared to X86 and X64 architecture, the Cell is what it is. Much of our current code is not optimized for radically different hardware. You see, we automatically think hardware, which is the most inflexible, should be optimized rather than refining the code instead.

That said, and from your point of view, when it comes to massive data calculations - pure number crunching, the cell, based on GPU architecture, is much more suited...more optimized...for such tasks than standard X86 and X64 systems.

3GenGames5363d ago

^ How do you say it's more optimized when the optimization is both in the compilers, with GCC well developed and easy to use, and then also the programmers, who hate the thing to death? I mean, did you not catch the fact that you have to write the code in parallel? It's not possible to just write code and for it to work on PS3 better, it takes months of work even from big companies who usually get that stuff done quick and without complaining, but when they're complaining you know something's screwed with that PoS architecture.

But besides, like I said, they won't license and nobody would be crazy enough to pick it up, so all is irrelevant. :)

Ju5363d ago

There is nothing "in the compilers". A compiler will not solve the problem to "optimize" code for the CELL, that requires dedicated engineering; explicit forwarding code to SPUs. And as such, you run at least one compiler for the PPU (PowerPC/Power ABI) and SPUs and interface those properly. There is no compiler which does this automatically - no "auto vectorizer" which decides which goes on the PPU or SPU and even schedules code and data on the fly. The PPU is as good as any CPU (x86 or ARM - well, quite faster than ARM).

GoogleTV is more a problem of native code than anything. If Sony can port Dalvik and the basic GoogleTV framework to the PS3 it might as well work - but only for Java apps. Everything written with the NDK will not run (requires either a PowerPC version of Googles OS or an ARM/x86 emulator) and explicit recompile for PPC (and then, there will still be no SPU optimization).

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5363d ago
TheIneffableBob5364d ago

Samsung and Sony appear to have the most open arms towards Cyanogenmod. Samsung even hired one of the main guys behind the project.

HTC was pretty open towards the group but I think they backed off a little bit recently for some reason.

ps3o-k5363d ago

here's hoping that future ps3 updates will offer google support.

80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
54d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted54d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8554d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele53d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla53d ago (Edited 53d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk53d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay53d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 53d ago
Athlon10154d ago (Edited 54d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit53d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg53d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10153d ago (Edited 53d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14953d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
67d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_67d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle66d ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker67d ago (Edited 67d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit66d ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog67d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_67d ago (Edited 67d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog67d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad67d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_67d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage67d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda66d ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

67d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
40°

Sony Shows Off 20 Minutes of Crimson Desert on a Base PS5

Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
BlazedKong93d ago

looks god awful on the base systems