BF3 Destruction Gameplay Trailer

Organization XII5331d ago

The bastards disabled Destruction in the beta :D

Battlefield 3 is true next-generation game on PC(those who played Caspian Border know what I'm talking about).

Too bad console versions won't be as half good - and no I'm not trolling, I'm just being dead honest. This should have been a PS4/Xbox720 launch title.

Reply Agree 4 Disagree 8

Stadler5331d ago

Yea I've been a Battlefield Gamer since 1942 and I played BF3 primarily on the PC. During Beta I tried it out on my PS3 and it was pretty terrible in comparison.

Agree 3 Disagree 3

SJPFTW5331d ago

the only difference between console and PC (played both) is graphics and 64 player conquest. Other than that its the same game and hardly those make up "half" of BF3.

On the other note most of the PC's playing BF3 will be playing on graphics settings that looks something similar to consoles (not everyone can play it max) or even worst than that. so troll harder please and not waste your 1 bubble

Agree 9 Disagree 3

Arnon5331d ago (Edited 5331d ago )

Im pretty sure the minimum requirements for BF3 on PC is more demanding than consoles, so no. I believe even the lowest settings on the PC version will outdo the console versions.

Minimum System Requirements
OS: Windows Vista (Service Pack 2) 32-Bit
Processor: 2 GHz Dual Core (Core 2 Duo 2.4 GHZ or Althon X2 2.7 GHz)
Memory: 2 GB
Hard Drive: 20 GB
Graphics Card (AMD): DirectX 10.1 compatible with 512 MB RAM (ATI RADEON 3000, 4000, 5000 OR 6000 series, with ATI RADEON 3870 or higher performance)
Graphics Card (NVIDIA): DirectX 10.0 compatible with 512 MB RAM (NVIDIA GEFORCE 8, 9, 200, 300, 400 OR 500 series with NVIDIA GEFORCE 8800 GT or higher performance)
Sound card : DirectX compatible
Keyboard and Mouse
DVD ROM Drive

No idea how that thought popped into your head. That's idiotic considering the game requires Directx 10.1 as a minimum requirement.

Agree 4 Disagree 2

trenso15331d ago

if you werent trolling you would have left consoles out of you post entirely

Agree 0 Disagree 1

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5331d ago

RyuDrinksTheDew5331d ago

nobody can deny how impressive that looks.

stunning.

Reply Agree 9 Disagree 0

TitanUp5331d ago

dice just used wrong map for beta but ill be a happy bf3 gamer on october 25th

danieldeath5331d ago

Is it for both Sp and MP ?

RaptorGTA5331d ago

I'm going to assume the tower falling is single player. I can't imagine the tower able to fall in multi considering its an important area. Tho I do remember reading that dice said it could be takin down..guess we'll see.

Arnon5331d ago

That's Caspian Border.

RaptorGTA5331d ago

yes but most multi maps are based off of single player levels. So it could be a cut scene from the single player. or something similar to the clip with the rocket hitting the hotel, a scripted event.

With DICE talking about how destruction can ruin a maps layout (why buildings wont collapse) i dont see why the tower would be destructible because it wont last 2 minutes in multiplayer then.

Agree 0 Disagree 0

Spenok5331d ago

Eh, assuming you would have to take out ALL the wires holing the tower up, AND maybe make it extra hard to take down by having to throw some C4 at its base, i could see this lasting a bit longer, seeing as how the wires go down slanted. Taking out all of them would require you do run around the ENTIRE map just to get to them all, making you have to pretty much ignor all objectives.

Oh well, i just hope i can take it down. It would be awesome to kill someone with it. :D

Show all comments (20)

80°

Battlefield 3 Cut Missions From Campaign Detailed by Former DICE Dev

Stadler · 2011-10-11T20:49:47Z

A new video showing the Destruction in Battlefield. The most impressive part is the destruction on Caspian Border.

excaliburps|494d ago |News|3|

Battlefield 3's former Lead Designer has revealed that there were two cut missions from the main campaign

Battlefield 3 PC PS3 Xbox 360 mp1st.com

Read Full Story >>

mp1st.com

- Comments (3)

XiNatsuDragnel494d ago

I wish someone can get those EA game leaks to see all the cut content ngl

anast493d ago

Get rid of campaigns, move the game to mobile, and try to compete with warzone. They would save time and money.

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 7

Johnh5223493d ago (Edited 493d ago )

Bf4 was fun hope the new bf is just as good.

Battlefield 3 Battlefield: Bad Company 2 PC PS3 Xbox 360 gamerant.com

100°

Battlefield Needs the Glory Days of BF3 and Bad Company 2 Back

FallenAngel1984|1279d ago |Opinion piece|22|

Whether it comes through remakes or a new game with a similar style, DICE should aim to revive the glory days of Battlefield 3 and Bad Company 2.

Read Full Story >>

gamerant.com

- Comments (22)

Expand all

masterfox1279d ago

hmmm I think there will be no old BF glory days for EA since they are loyal to their greediness and laziness :D

Reply Agree 9 Disagree 0

Knightofelemia1279d ago

You're asking for a miracle with EA that will never happen unless they can exploit the money making schemes behind it.

Reply Agree 5 Disagree 0

MadLad1279d ago

We'll see what happens now that Zampella is overlooking the series.

Reply Agree 3 Disagree 2

1279d ago

Replies(1)

Father__Merrin1279d ago

Anyone that wants to plat bf3 you can still go ahead and play it

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 5

Psychotica1278d ago

Why are they so reluctant to create a new Bad Company??

Reply Agree 2 Disagree 0

INMATEofARKHAM1278d ago

Single player campaigns take time and effort... EA ain't got time for that.

Fluke_Skywalker1278d ago

DICE have already stated that they actually don't know how to. They literally have no idea what made BC2 so good and clearly have no idea how to repeat it.

Yui_Suzumiya1278d ago

Definitely agree with the title. If they make Bad Company 3 then that would definitely be a step in the right direction!

ChubbyBlade1278d ago

It’s done. The current development team has no idea why people liked BF.

Reply Agree 4 Disagree 0

CorndogBurglar1278d ago

Which is so ignorant it almost physically hurts.

They have the damn templates lol. Everyone LOVED Battlefield all the way up through BF4. Everything after BF4 is where fans started getting divided because they started dumbing down the gameplay.

So they need to go back to the favorites. Bad Company 2. BF3 and BF4.

Take those games. Take the exact same gameplay. Update the graphics. Add some different game modes. Make new maps. Add new guns. Choose two armies. And make a single player campaign.

That's seriously it. They need to quit trying to make BF something it isn't. They have everything they need. Why they can't figure this out just hurts my brain trying to understand.

Orchard1278d ago

BF3? They need to go back to BF2 for the mainline. Heck, I'd settle for true-to-source remakes of BF2 and BC2 (w/ Vietnam). Everything they've done in the 'modern' era is just bad.

CorndogBurglar1278d ago

Anything from BF2 - BF4 would work fine. Those were all great games.

MadLad1278d ago

I thought BF3 and 4 were great, and I've been playing since 1942.

Demetrius1278d ago (Edited 1278d ago )

Doubt they will smh which is messed up

TheColbertinator1278d ago

EAis pretending to be one of those deaf mutes

Profchaos1278d ago

I've not played 2042 myself but after v I don't feel like it. I played a few hours of v with friends but it feels ultra sterile I can't figure it out but the game looks and feels clinical. The storys in the campaign were also bland and uninteresting and felt like a dull trudge through checkpoints as you waited for an ending.

I've played the franchise dating back to it's original PC launch and PS2 spin off games I did enjoy 1 overall and it's take on placing you in different scenarios and battles was interesting but not all that good imo as you couldn't really connect with any characters longer than 2 hours.

hardline for all the hate it recived was a fun story and a new take but a bad mp game

I feel like v overall was the turning point and instead of showing the gritty reality of war they turned everything sterile and presented it in a clean cut boring frame in order to pump it full of weird micro transactions overall they spent far to much time on trying to implant ray tracing and other graphical flourishes and forgot to make the game enjoyable