All Channels
Popular
1120°

PS3 Firmware 4.0: Next major update discussed

Product-Reviews.net: Each time we see a minor update to Sony’s PlayStation 3 software we’re met with a bucket load of features that users want, also a few problems different users face with the system. The idea of firmware updates that don’t bring new features, and instead fix security and bug issues will only keep PS3 users happy for so long. So we wanted to look at the future and what PS3 Firmware 4.0 could bring, which will be the next major update.

Read Full Story >>
product-reviews.net
xX-StolenSoul-Xx5339d ago (Edited 5339d ago )

Sony said Cross Game Chat is not possible. Not enough ram and the XMB is a Ram hogger

gogospeedracer5339d ago ShowReplies(13)
Gray-Fox-Type05338d ago ShowReplies(2)
Rhythmattic5338d ago (Edited 5338d ago )

Some good points here..

My Cross Game Chat input..

In the last PS3 update, I can now only Mute my Official PS3 mkII Headset while in a game....

Take it for what its worth,but to have a mute function that works by keeping your friends in contact, through out play, but dis-engaging everyone else.. Afterall, you'd never mute yourself for a friend.... Would you ?

Maybe its their way around the supposedly MS "Patented" crap , or maybe with each OS footprint they reduce, they could free it up for Other uses...
.
Maybe I'm wrong, and most likely I am, but it seems crazy to lose a mute function, while not in-game..

Bleucrunch5338d ago

Speaking as an IT professional...RAM is gold the more you have the more the device can do at a single time...that is why RAM cost so much...But I am pretty sure the next playstation will have a sufficient amount to do what is needed...but don't expect a crazy amount...RAM is expensive I can't stress that enough to my fellow gamers.

STONEY45338d ago

In today's world, 8GB of RAM at $50 is not expensive. Neither is 4GB for $30. I do expect at least that next-gen.

Gawdl3y5338d ago

Erm... No, RAM is not expensive. You can get 8gb nowadays for $60 USD, many times for even less.

GiNJAXL5338d ago

"IT PROFESSIONAL"
"RAM COSTS A LOT"

Hmm.. you'd think an 'it professional' would know that RAM is extremely cheap.

This has already been expressed thou, by the guys above me.

An 'it professional' would know that the actual use of ram for something like cross game chat would be so low that if Sony seriously can't figure out how to enable it they should start thinking about hiring people who actually know what they are doing. Their OS hogs so much god damn ram it's retarded. 60% of the ram usage could be freed up if they removed all the BS on the dashboard. I already own a PS3 and know about the Store you don't need to run adds for both on my dashboard. Certain services could be dropped completely. why have both a movie store and a game store when you can access both from each other? Why not do what any one else would and combine them. (Microsoft needs to do this as well)

Hows about that picture viewer? Oh that's right 95% of cameras allow you do to that very thing simply by plugging it into the TV.

Music player? Why!? You know you own a stereo. Why not oh I dunno.. use it. Not to mention that desktop or laptop you have sitting there.. both of those play music. Even if they don't have a disc drive you can use Pandora/Last.Fm many of the internet radio stations so on and so forth.

Hows about that "whats new section?" Do you need that? Hmm? Do you need to know that you recently play Uncharted? You should probably know seeing as YOU JUST PLAYED IT. The rest of the info in that section is adds. Just what we need a constantly running add generator like as if the XMB doesn't have two of those already.

Hows about that Home.. that was awesome wasn't it? No? Oh whats that you turned it on once and then never used it again? Yeah.. just like everyone else. If they wanted to do Second Life on the PS3 they should have just done Second Life on the PS3.

jhenri5338d ago

I think you mean it's expensive to use a lot of ram in console. Sure you can get 8 gb for $60 or whatever but when you add that cost into what the other components are going to cost, that adds up quickly. How many of you guys are willing to pay $600 again.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5338d ago
T3MPL3TON 5338d ago

They could easily modify the XMB to hog less ram to free up enough for Cross Game Chat, but then again they wouldn't need to BECAUSE CROSS GAME CHAT DOESN'T USE RAM.

xX-StolenSoul-Xx5338d ago

not as easy as you may think, they actually had a problem with the ps3 that made third party games look bad because the XMB was a memory hog and they did fix that issue but it's hard to lower it down anymore without suffering extream performance.

Look at the Xmb while ingame, it runs slowly right?

Cross Game Chat does not use ram on the Xbox because they implemented that feature into their operating system before the console was released.
Ps3 never had this in mind so the only way they would be able to add Cross game chat is by using up more ram... which they wont do.

princejb1345338d ago

last time i was hyped for a ps3 update dinasours walked the earth
commong sony bring me something new and interesting
at least minimize the in game xmb so it can load faster

xX-StolenSoul-Xx5338d ago

i would much want a full blown XMB interface update. I feel left out, Microsoft updated theirs 3 times and we never got our updated besides for Dynamic themes

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5338d ago
tr00p3r5339d ago

I don't believe that the PS3 isn't 'powerful' enough to handle cross game chat.. it's just that Sony are too fucking lazy to put it in yet, and when it does come it will more than likely be a Plus only feature anyway.

DragonKnight5339d ago

Oh yes, because Sony hasn't ever listened to what the fans want and (for reasons that are beyond the ken of mankind) fans have NEVER repeatedly asked for Cross Game Chat. It's not the most requested feature on Playstation Share Blog at all. /s

Troll somewhere else.

RevXM5339d ago (Edited 5339d ago )

Im with tr00p3r on this one.

PS3's os requires about 50 MB of the ram.
While 360's os requires only 35 or something...
And 360 got more ingame features... what does that tell you?

It tells me XGC should be possible.
Its not the most important thing of all, but I would sure as hell apreciate it!

Sony should be able to free up some more memory for sure and also make thing faster, slicker and smarter etc.

DragonKnight5338d ago

You're forgetting the way memory is allocated in the PS3 is different from the 360, you're also forgetting that the PS3 has more multimedia features than the 360. There's all kinds of reasons why it isn't just about 50MB of RAM for the OS. It's also likely that MS has a specific patent on the way they do XGC which forces Sony to find another way. The truth is that we don't know everything, but to suggest that it's just because Sony is lazy and doesn't want to add the feature is asinine.

gamingdroid5338d ago (Edited 5338d ago )

It's pretty simple really, the PS3 OS although occupies about 50MB of RAM, but it is actually split into main memory and video (local) memory in 7MB and 43MB chunk. See page 28:

http://research.scee.net/fi...

That means, it is that much harder to reduce it if it is even feasible. Especially since Sony originally had allocated 120 MB for the OS and already reduced it by 60%.

My inclination is that xross game chat being the most requested feature for years, Sony would have done it if they could. I mean the system is 5-years old.

Maybe with a complete redo of the dash (like MS is doing), but that would be a huge undertaking considering all the API hooks already in use. Also Sony is too busy focusing on PS Vita. They pretty much abandoned even PS Move so by the time they get it released, we might very well be in the next generation....

playboi285338d ago (Edited 5338d ago )

Are people forgetting the steps forward that Sony already made? Did people honestly forget that the PS Store used to be a webpage? Did they forget that there was no in-game XMB? Netflix used to require a disc to play? There was only a Sixaxis and not a Dual Shock 3? There were no trophies? They had video chat BEFORE PS Move & Kinect? People really need to cut them some slack. They do listen. Usually, if they haven't done something (especially something so highly requested) it can't be done. For example, people have been complaining about the Xbox 360's crappy ass d-pad. They came out with a "replacement" that's almost just as crappy. Reason? Patent issues. Research before complaining people!

A-Glorious-Dawn5338d ago (Edited 5338d ago )

When me and my friends play we use the text chat...It can be used regardless of what game your on, it can be accessed with the press of a button and you can have multiple rooms open for different groups of people...

We all have usb keyboards hooked up as well so we chat fast.

I think this feature is largely overlooked and hugely unappreciated.... When you get in game the mic's come on.. may be a bit slower, but is the result not the same?

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5338d ago
T3MPL3TON 5338d ago

I agree trooper, there is no reason they can't put it in, they just refuse to.

CynicalVision5339d ago

Having the ability to do something simple like deleting 0% trophy data would be great.

waltyftm5339d ago

Well said, got a few dodgy Jap games that could be done away with.

LoneWanderer095338d ago

Also a option to delete some Avatars i got so many that came bundle together and i downloaded them just for the fun of it, but now it takes a long time to get to the ones i really like

THC CELL5339d ago

We don't NEED cross game chat, its spoiling gaming
I was playing bf3 with people in party chat and i could not tell them where to go and who is getting shot at.

Same with halo
Now if they say well all servers are not aloud party chat for matchmaking games then i will approve
Sony don't add it.

M1chl5339d ago

Because if you have a choice use something, its always worse...

JellyJelly5338d ago

I bet he didn't need rumble and trophies either...

Canary5338d ago

No, we don't NEED it. At all. Doesn't everyone has a cell phone by now? Use that.

Hell, we don't even need CHAT, period. Chat would only be useful in some theoretical game where one player acted as a "commander" and could set down waypoints/objectives/routes on the map. When everyone is just running and gunning it's just pointless chatter--which is often incomprehensible due to the cheap-ass microphones being used + mumbling + background noise.

Raoh5338d ago

party chat is the worst.

I played left 4 dead 1 or 2, i forget which, on the 360 once and I could not get any feedback from my team i spoke and spoke and spoke until finally one person came on and said 'oh sorry me and the other guys are on party chat' then continued to ignore me again.

why bother leaving that spot open? why party chat if 3 of the 4 people playing are playing the same game?

damn shame what online chat has done to people.

Ezio20485339d ago

i know i am being ridiculous but if we could play on our PS3 with an Xbox 360 user?
specially a shooting game.....>_>
no leave it...neither its possible nor anyone would want that..
anyways i am happy with my PS3 but i would want to play all classic PS2 games!!!

roguewarrior5338d ago

should of got the 60GB PS3 when you had the chance(:

Show all comments (121)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
19d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted18d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8518d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele18d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla18d ago (Edited 18d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk17d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay17d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 17d ago
Athlon10118d ago (Edited 18d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit17d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg17d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10117d ago (Edited 17d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14918d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
31d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_31d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle31d ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker31d ago (Edited 31d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit31d ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog31d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_31d ago (Edited 31d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog31d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad31d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_31d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage31d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda31d ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

31d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
40°

Sony Shows Off 20 Minutes of Crimson Desert on a Base PS5

Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
BlazedKong57d ago

looks god awful on the base systems