
E-mpire Writes: Sony has recently filed a patent that may shed some light on the future of motion control on PlayStation.

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.
Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.
Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses
The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.
Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.
I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.
There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.
I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.
I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.
Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.
Sony is improving the current technologies that we have like the wii is to Move. I'm not against that but, they should try and innovate more.
Opps what i meant was that CD-ROM was actually first mass produced by Sony and Philips, just not the first gaming console though. But i'm pretty sure Sony was the first company to bring us portable CD player.
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/W...
I think it's interesting... it it remains to be seen, if anything can be implemented well in a next-gen system.
Or if Sony will actually try to sell the additional controller with the console itself, next-gen. If it remains a seperate peripheral, then I don't think too many third parties will really take advantage of it. This in turn will mean that such a system will have to remain very cheap in production. Two cameras aren't expensive in itself. The algorithms to make it work might be. It depends on where this calculation takes place. Kinect has some chips inside the system, which does some calculations prior to sending it to the box. Nothing major, but it saves the box time to do other stuff... and it lowers bandwidth requirements, too.
My question is... is this the way to go for gaming, or was the Wii just a fad, that's "dead" now, because of telephone and pad gaming?
Awesome keep up the excellent work sony i can't wait to see it in action!