All Channels
Popular
160°

Could Every Multiplayer Game Require an Online Pass Next Generation?

GOS: "The real question here is that could companies follow EA, THQ, and Sony and try out online passes for themselves in the near future? There are definitely pros and cons to the system, but the potential for addition revenue from a released title could way in the favor of all games (or most) requiring a pass to play online next generation."

Read Full Story >>
gamesonsmash.com
dangert125370d ago

Next gen they will have a work around so you aint putting in codes but i recon they wull yeah

badz1495370d ago

These passes are useless for offline only games but will be in every single online enabled games from now on. Sucks but it's not the end of the world. New copies will get cheaper over time for most games and this hopefully will stop gamestop from overcharging for used copies.

Dark_Overlord5370d ago

I thought Rage was SP only, and that has an online pass that locks sections of the SP. I wouldn't put it past other companies pulling crap like that

badz1495370d ago

lots of things I'm uninformed on! is it confirmed that RAGE will be like that? that's bullshit!

theonlylolking5369d ago (Edited 5369d ago )

You wont have to live with it from now on if you just stop buying games that have online pass. The companies will end up losing TONS more money and they will go back to the good times when we did not have online pass.

Do not just deal with it, you need to go against it.

@kasasensei
NFS hot pursuit allows all accounts to play.

badz1495369d ago

it's not like I like to live with it but this is only a problem if you buy used games, right? from the look of it, it doesn't seem like this idea will go away just like that anytime soon. EA was reported to generate quite an amount from their online pass if I'm not mistaken.

what if your most anticipated and most love games have this feature? look at it this way, if you really anticipate, excited about and love the game, you would have buy it new anyway, right? so...I don't know but I still feel that this idea is still just a fraction of the evilness of always online DRM that some games are incorporating at the moment or the requirement of Origins for BF3 that EA is about to do. just my 2 cents!

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5369d ago
Lazyeye795370d ago

It should be illegal, if my brother wants to play a game online that I bought to play online, they shouldn't be able to charge me more just so he can play.

kasasensei5370d ago

Resistance 3 is the only game on the market which its PASS allows access to online game to every account on the console.

CaptainMarvelQ85370d ago

It's the new Pass program from Sony,so im sure every other sony published game will have the same feature

badz1495370d ago

I have never buy any online pass before but those from EA not working on multiple accounts on a same console? Wow didn't know that. That sucks!

Legion5370d ago (Edited 5370d ago )

Article Quote- "While the sales are not “dramatic” in volume, he pointed out that it is all “found revenue” that comes from users who previously “consumed bandwidth for free.”

The problem with this idea is the thought that people who buy used games and play online are consuming bandwidth that they aren't authorized to. That is incorrect, the same amount of bandwidth that would have potentially been used by the original purchaser is still being used. Just not by the original purchaser.

It is not like 2 people are now using the bandwidth and one person didn't pay for it. Still only 1 person using the bandwidth expected from the sale of the game.

This online pass is purely the way for companies to garnish more money. It in no way is it them recouping bandwidth.

kasasensei5370d ago

Totally true. They are lying to us and treating us like money bag on legs.

GarandShooter5369d ago

I've seen you post this theory previously, so lets talk about it.

While you are correct that 2 players cannot use the same copy at the same time, there are other considerations.

When determining the amount of server support needed, I would think devs would look at projected game sales, average number of players on at one time, average hours of usage per player, etc. Otherwise, wouldn't they have to theoretically have servers set up to accommodate every player at all times?

Imagine the player, who reaches their averages, then trades in the game. Now, another player buys that used copy and also reaches their averages. This is where that consumed bandwidth comes into play.

Then there's stat tracking and other player support.

Players that bought new (and supported the dev/pub) paid for it, why should a used buyer (that didn't support the dev/pub) get it for free?

The real question, in my mind, is 'Are the fees excessive?'

Does $10.00 cover the bandwidth expenses only?

Does it cover the bandwidth and the cost of implementing the pass system?

Does it cover all that and provide some additional profit?

Is its pricing the 'sweet spot' where less wouldn't deter used sales, and more may deter new sales.

Let's say you and I work at the same place. You drive there everyday and I ride with you. Would you expect me to contribute gas money? You're going to drive there anyway, right, so why would I need to pay? Yeah, my extra 200 lbs of body weight would have a negative impact on your fuel mileage, but it would be so small (yet measurable) a difference that you should have no problem absorbing the expense, right?

There's more to the picture than meets the eye.

Legion5369d ago (Edited 5369d ago )

Not sure what you are asking here. You talk about reaching an average?

Lets try and take these ideas one at a time:

1. projected game sales: obviously this is a factor in determining bandwidth needed, but has no impact if you are seeing that 1 person 1 game equals bandwidth. (unless they are just angry thinking they have lost a potential new buyer if no used market, still nothing changed in bandwidth need)

2. average number of players on at one time: again we are talking still 1 person here not 2 per game so no factor in the bandwidth for used purchaser.

2. average hours of usage per player: I am assuming this is where you are really trying to go? Are you factoring the point where a player will be bored with a game and then just not play online anymore and then selling the game and the new person has a higher interest in playing online versus previous owner?

I can somewhat see this happening. A bunch of guys sitting around at a table thinking... hey at this point we have our projected sales made and at this point we have when people are going to be bored with our game and we won't have to support it anymore online. (and some guy yelling winnnning when nobody is playing anymore)

So you are basically saying that they are building in a games potential online success. And this means that what... Halo and CoD developers are loosing out because they are having to support their online play more due to being popular?

I would play devils advocate and say that if anything, continued online play of any game garnishes more ad bucks then it does revenue needed to support the players. Each player online playing is advertising that game as being quality enough to still be played. Look at CoD... so many people are still playing the games that everyone else wants to buy and play the next game.

Especially when it comes to XBox game play as you see your friends list and what they are currently playing. Huge plus seeing your game being played by others. I would say a large percentage of games are bought from peer pressure... what your friends are playing is what you will be playing too.

So basically you have a point that there is always more to the picture, but from what I see there is a developers view of the picture and the consumers view of the picture. But if the consumer gets tired of developers telling them to squint their eyes and see the hidden dolphins, then that consumer is just going to go look at a better picture.

Lastly my friends get free rides to work. I'm not an asshole like EA.

Legion5369d ago

And to finish off my bubbles so I don't have to give long boring replies.

Your part where you said: "Is its pricing the 'sweet spot' where less wouldn't deter used sales, and more may deter new sales."

This hits the nail on the head to the real motivation of developers. Deter used sales and try to garnish more sales. How? By trying to get the money that used sales are making.

I can picture future Toyota making new electronic keys to their vehicles. You have to get them logged to your drivers license. And if you sell the car then the next owner has to pay to get the key changed to their license so they can drive.

thebudgetgamer5370d ago

online passes suck, but i don't mind throwing devs some cash if done right.

No_Pantaloons5370d ago (Edited 5370d ago )

In time it will since people are allowing it to happen.

This is the lowest of the low, greedily taking money that never belonged to you and claiming your entitled to it. He says they're being "cut out of the profits", bullsh**, want me to draw a ******* diagram, cause your company made the initial sale, I'll put a stick figure with a dollar sign bag in each hand, so he'll know which one is him.

The used market was never a problem. Should the movie studios start locking out dvds and blurays and add a code, so they can protect their profits from 2nd hand sales. Think up whatever commodity you want , this have never been allowed. There is no excuse for it, it literally saddens me to think people accept this as ok.

Kyosuke_Sanada5370d ago

I wholeheartedly agree. But the problem is everybody looks at it selfishly saying "its not my problem" but not looking at the bigger picture.

All of these companies are not hurting for money at all and this isn't a benefit for the consumer at the least, its all about control.

They keep feeding these companies breadcrumbs not knowing that they are gnawing their arms in the process but no one will cry foul until we stat payin double for all games online which means DRM will be standard as well.

Show all comments (26)
60°

Final Fantasy X 25th Anniversary Website Launches With New Nomura Artwork and Merchandise

Square Enix launches Final Fantasy X 25th anniversary site, revealing new Nomura art, books, music releases, and merchandise.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
-Foxtrot27d ago

Look I know VIII has its issues and all that but how on earth can the do big anniversary events with new artwork and merchandise for VII, IX and X yet VIII got sweet f*** all.

They could have given it something during its 25th anniversary yet all it got was a single Happy Anniversary post on their social media.

solideagle26d ago

they should know that we are OG fans of VIII as it sold truckload as well. not as much as VII or X. I personally didn't like IX but X and VI are my personal fav.

Shadow Hearts 2 covenant is another game I love. I hope one day someone can make remake, I would be delighted

Relientk7726d ago

Final Fantasy VIII is great and you are always the first to defend it in the comments

40°

15 Years Ago, Mortal Kombat (2011) Saved Gaming’s Biggest Fighting Franchise

A brutal reset, a smarter story, and a return to what made it great—Mortal Kombat (2011) revived the series.

Read Full Story >>
fortressofsolitude.co.za
italiangamer35d ago

"Gaming’s Biggest Fighting Franchise"

Press X to (seriously) doubt.

DarXyde33d ago

Underrated comment. I used to hate that game so much that any time my siblings asked me to play it, I just picked Hom and shut myself down mid-match.

Soy34d ago

And then MK1 killed it again.

DivineHand12533d ago (Edited 33d ago )

15 years went by so fast. I remember playing through the story mode at launch.

90°

PlayStation legend Shuhei Yoshida says Jim Ryan fired him because he didn't listen to him

Why did Sony push Shuhei Yoshida out of his role leading PlayStation's first-party games? He'd overseen some huge successes. Well, apparently, he didn't listen.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
Relientk7735d ago

Yeah I can see that for sure. Shuhei Yoshida should have been in charge not Jim Ryan.

Cacabunga35d ago

It should be free highway for him now.. but Sony are too stupid to see this, especially that moron Hulst

S2Killinit34d ago (Edited 34d ago )

Wtf why all that anger. PlayStation is dominating on every level. Besides I think there is a little more to hiring a CEO than just who is available. Its not like its a athlete your team wants to buy.

neutralgamer199234d ago

S2Killinit

live service failures, chasing trends, closing studios. yes dominating

Cacabunga34d ago

Sony is Dominating because competition is not existing. Compared to previous gens this is the poorest in terms of software offerings.

Last gen we got Uncharted 4 Lost Legacy and TLOU2 from ND alone.

This is so far a remasters gen, with no competition to lift up the quality

1nsomniac34d ago (Edited 34d ago )

..."PlayStation is dominating on every level"....

...Really???

PlayStation are soon heading into a new generation in the not to distant future. They currently have the worst customer satisfaction they've ever sustained as a company. The company is heading for a huge crash while at the same time they'll need to be planning how they are going to try and win back that favour and the build up to their new releases.

Yes financially they're winning but they're going to have to ride out this complete public corporate disaster. No one has faith in the company or the product anymore. They've damaged their public image so much this generation. Greed can kill anyone.

medman34d ago

Hulst is a disaster......

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 34d ago
blacktiger34d ago

He would've done the same thing and fire Jim Ryan and Shuhei would be the villain. Why?
Because Elite creates the narrative and distraction for gamers, users and citizens.

Outside_ofthe_Box35d ago

More confirmation that Jim Ryan is the culprit for what has happened to Sony. Hulst needs to go too. What sucks is that a lot of the good top heads at Sony are no longer there. I wish that guys that were forced out prematurely by Dumbo Jimbo like Shuhei and Layden came back.

robtion34d ago

Yep. Yoshida was responsible for bringing one of the best games of this generation to playstation (Stellar Blade). He is an actual gamer and is in touch with what gamers want (creative, fun games, not GaaS and agenda pushing). He also seems like a genuinely nice guy if you watch some interviews. Of course they got rid of him.

darthv7235d ago

Makes you wonder if MS even thought about hiring him after Phil and Sarah were leaving. He certainly couldn't make their situation any worse.

Agent7534d ago

Microflop. After Windows XP and Xbox 360, it all went floppy.

S2Killinit34d ago

Floppy 😆
No pun intended

badz14935d ago

Yoshida for President! Jim Ryan was and always be a hack! Sony should get Shu back

Lightning7735d ago

All the gamer/consumer lead heads are gone across PS and Xbox. shuhei gone phil's gone (questionable) but gone. The future of gaming is somewhat uncertain across the board.

Show all comments (30)