All Channels
Popular
200°

Sony: 3DS doesn't work very well

Sony has offered some snarky comments on the 3DS, attempting to avoid a direct assault but very clearly letting the world know what it's talking about. The attack comes by way of Mick Hocking, who expressed no surprise that the system didn't have a huge launch.

“When people see 3D that doesn’t work very well, or content that isn’t very compelling, I think quite naturally they’re not as interested in it,” he said, when asked to comment on the 3DS' performance. "A message we’ve been giving to all of our PS3 developers is add 3D where it adds something to the game. It’s not a tickbox we want on all the game boxes; we want 3D to add to the experience. The other really important thing is to do it well."

He added that the PS Vita isn't getting 3D because the visual quality suffers, and that for the "first" Vita, 2D visuals were the way to go. Sounds good to me. I'm getting sick of anything to do with 3D by now anyway.

Read Full Story >>
destructoid.com
DarkCharizard_5381d ago (Edited 5381d ago )

Clearly Sony has not played Ocarina of Time 3D...

Oh well, sucks for them! :D

StanLee5381d ago (Edited 5381d ago )

Who is Mick Hocking anyway and who made him Sony's mouthpiece? I hate when one person's comment gets misconstrued as the view of an entire company.

theonlylolking5381d ago

It still does not work that well.

guitarded775381d ago (Edited 5381d ago )

Seriously Dark, if you have to go back to a game from 1998 to find the best title on a current gen system, you got issues. I expect better trolling from you... prove to me that you are the troll I believe you are.

DarkCharizard_5381d ago (Edited 5381d ago )

Stealth edit!!!11

hahaha... this is more fun than I imagined ;)

guitarded775381d ago (Edited 5381d ago )

That's more like it!!! :D

Karum5381d ago

He didn't say everything sucks. He said if 3D isn't done well and doesn't add to the experience then people aren't as interested in it. This was followed up by him saying that's why 3D isn't a tickbox to be checked by developers making PS3 games, they tell devs to add it in there if it adds to the experience as only then will people have an interest.

smt305381d ago

I've played OoT it's a great game (obviously) but the 3D isn't all that amazing. It feels a bit weird tbh, kinda like particle affects are stuck on the screen and everything from there goes in a bit like a puppet show.

darthv725381d ago

it works quite well. It is easy to display simple 2d images and give the impression they look better based on the type of display. Like watching a "dvd" move on a CRT then a plasma and then lcd and finally led. It is the same movie but the perception of the quality and clarity changes.

Not only that, everyone's eyes adjust differently even to non 3d content. Unless Sony can guaranty a perfect 20/20 display for everyone regardless of glasses or not then they themselves know this.

The 3d in the 3ds varies from game to game. I like how it can be adjusted unlike other 3d based systems/tv. If you have a 3d tv you cant adjust the output to compensate for the person wearing contacts or prescription lenses. The 3ds you can.

Sony is just trying to downplay the 3ds like they did the kinect. It hurts to be shown up on something that works and not be the company that created it. They can improve on nintendos idea but they dont have to trash talk like a sore loser.

axisofweevils5381d ago (Edited 5381d ago )

The 3D is not the problem with the 3DS.
Lack of good games is.

DlocDaBudSmoka5381d ago

not sure what kind of 3D tvs youve messed around with, but mine has adjustment settings for the 3D.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5381d ago
zerocrossing5381d ago

Sony said that? Well why would they bad mouth a company's product they are in direct rivalry to, and who is the leading handheld devs for over 20 years?

PCE5381d ago (Edited 5381d ago )

Nintendo dropped the 3DS price
Sony is getting insecure
Sony is getting cocky

Instead of bashing the competition how about making a Pokemon competitor? The majority of Nintendo fans don't care about your uncharted or God of War spinoffs. You're not winning the competition by any stretch of imagination.

Sony fail +1

zerocrossing5381d ago

It would be interesting if Sony did create a direct competitor to Pokemon, Nintendo have their own formula but just think about all of the untapped potential just waiting to be discovered.

Its a worthwhile endeavour if I ever heard one.

fatstarr5378d ago

sony isnt creative enough to come up with a Pokemon competitor.

they would have to make a new genre of game

which i don't see happening.

sony is shook the vita wont sell better than the 3ds did at 249 in the middle of the spring no matter what anyone thinks.

Nintendo knows what they are doing
they have a strategy that works.

the only reason i got a ps3 in the first place was cuz of cod4. if sony wants to take market share from Nintendo they are gonna have to do alot besides talk.

WhiteLightning5381d ago

"He added that the PS Vita isn't getting 3D because the visual quality suffers, and that for the "first" Vita, 2D visuals were the way to go"

He's got a point, I would of rather had better looking graphics for Nintendos next gen handheld then the added 3D gimmick. It's like Nintendo has to rely on gimmicks now to sell their products. Motion Control, iPad looking controler, 3D. Least with Sony...and even Microsoft in some cases it's not forced down our neck. I bet Ocarina of time 3D would of looked even better without them focusing on the 3D part.

zerocrossing5381d ago (Edited 5381d ago )

I do agree to an extent but this is Nintendo we're talking about and it's what they've been doing for years, It's not right to expect them to do what's the norm, they are about innovation after all.

WhiteLightning5381d ago

Years.....well from when the Nintendo Wii launched fair enough.

But the NES, SNES, N64, Gamecube didn't have things added to it to make it sell. They were just gaming consoles, popular because of how amazing the console was it's self. Gamecube is the biggest example....it didn't really add anything to make it sell it was just Nintendo's next gen console, plain and simple. I mean you could say they had a few things here and there...maybe controler differences but nothing gimmick like as it's main selling point like the motion controls, iPad looking controler or the 3D.

But yeah despite all that I still agree with you. You raise a good point.

LOGICWINS5381d ago

Nintendo's never been about "teh graphics". If consumers were so concerned about visuals, then Pokemon wouldn't be among the most commercially successful portable gaming franchises.

zerocrossing5381d ago (Edited 5381d ago )

@WhiteLightning

Well N64 brought us the rumble pack and analogue stick, which have become standard now, and Gamecube tried to connect games via the GBA, But I do agree for the most part it was just next gen plain and simple.

The thing is Iwata is president of Nintendo now and he seems to do things differently.. And maybe doesn't make the best decisions.

@LOGICWINS

Exactly, Nintendo focus on gameplay and inovation to sell their games, graphics as we now know can only do so much. For Japan right now the handheld is king.

MrSpace5381d ago (Edited 5381d ago )

@LOGICWINS

I think what he means is when you have the choice between a gimmick like 3D and better visuals, graphics etc people would rather of had the better graphics/visuals over the stupid gimmick.

It's like when you go a see a film which has been done in 3D with all these crappy slow mo action scenes and things which look like they are coming out of the screen in nearly every scene....people would rather pick a better looking film over the added 3D gimmick because overall it would of made a better film.

LOGICWINS5381d ago (Edited 5381d ago )

"I think what he means is when you have the choice between a gimmick like 3D and better visuals, graphics etc people would rather of had the better graphics/visuals over the stupid gimmick."

So why didn't the PSP sell more units than the DS???

PSP(Graphics) vs DS(Duel Touchscreen "gimmick")

Shnazzyone5381d ago

@white Let me educate you about nintendo and throwing in interesting ideas. Nintendo hasen't changed at all, you say NES had no gimmicks so it'd sell? ROB the robot ring a bell? How about the powermat? NES Zapper? SNES wasn't sold with gimmicks, however nintendo did make a midi keyboard, a mouse, and the superscope for it. N64 had the analog stick as a selling point, in fact the whole controller was a gimmick with numerous plug ins including the first instance of Rumble in gaming. Gamecube they had bongos and a microphone. That was not too big a system for big N.

Nintendo has been experimenting with gaming experiences for years. Some things worked others don't As far as 3d goes. It's a great feature, it's not all the systems about but I think in this case sony is playing down 3d because they couldn't incorporate it into their handheld. Plain and simple.

Nicaragua5381d ago

To say that Nintendo was never about "teh graphics" is nonsense.

SNES was all about "teh graphics" with its mode 7 and Super FX chip. N64 was all about "teh graphics" with its RAM add on. Gamecube was better at "teh graphics" than the PS2.

Its only since they started recycling technology with the Wii that they stopped caring about "teh graphics".

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5381d ago
Number_135381d ago

thats funny, I could have sworn I went to buy the Wii and DS on my own accord...yes yes...I walked out of my car, walked into the store, grabbed the first blue DS I could find, giddily walked to the check out point and with feverish excitement handed over my money to the cashier, her name was Janet, I remember because she asked me if I wasn't too old to be getting so excited about "a nintendo"...I proceeded to school her about how the average gamer is 18 - 35yrs old but that is besides the point.
Nintendo were definitely NOT present on that day or the day I purchased Wii pointing a gun to my face forcing me to buy their motion controlled gimmicky devices. #FreeWill

TheDivine5381d ago

The real story here is the second vita with 3d. Im sure they will have a redisign with 3d and hopefully hdmi. Il wait for the redisign to see what features it adds.

I think the 3d on the 3ds is awesome, it really adds to games. The vita isnt competing with nintendo here. Different audiences, maybe 20% of customers overlap (my random made up number). Both kick ass.

newleaf5381d ago

They said the same thing about kinect...they are always bad mouthing the competition

5381d ago Replies(2)
Tempjf5381d ago

That's a pretty bold statement for Sony to make. Especially when they copied nintendo with the move.

Neko_Mega5381d ago (Edited 5381d ago )

Hows it a copy when Sony has been working on from 2000 up to the day Move came out?

Seems like it wasn't a copy if they were working on the idea before Nintendo.

http://www.youtube.com/watc... < lol Nintendo didn't make it first fanboys.

PCE5381d ago

Well that's stupid. Maybe the geniuses at Sony should have released the Move if it is so amazing.

The games on the Move are sh*t anyway so the controller is a dust magnet like the Wii.

Shnazzyone5381d ago

OMG!!! THAT VIDEO PROVES SO MUCH!!!! not to mention all those things look so much like a wiimote and the move looks NOTHING LIKE A WIIMOTE!!! Stop dilluting yourself. You are looking at sony working at the eyetoy, not the move. thothing in that video shows them working with gyroscopes in controllers which is what wii was. In addition, nintendo goes earlier then that with motion controls. They had the powerglove in the NES age.

Samus HD5381d ago

@neko mega that was sonys excuse or something like that I mean in video you showed that wasn't like wiimote that wa with the camera - That was eyetoy . Just stop complaining ' wii was the first of whar was , don't mix things up

Neko_Mega5381d ago (Edited 5381d ago )

http://www.youtube.com/watc... < Really? You people need to stop fooling yourself.

Don't be mad Sony had Kinect and motion control before the Wii.

Kind of the reason why Move works alot better then the Wiiremote.

Skateboard5381d ago

It's called not reading Neko.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5381d ago
LOGICWINS5381d ago

Sony didn't copy Nintendo with the Move..they had the idea LONG before we knew the Wii existed.

HOWEVER..if it wasn't for the Wii success, Sony probably wouldn't have followed through with the project.

Karum5381d ago (Edited 5381d ago )

It is a bold statement but it is actually true, if your viewing angle isn't right for a screen like the one on the 3DS then it does detract from the experience. It's not rally trash talking if you're stating a stone cold fact.

Not to mention the battery life using 3D is absolutely horrendous which is reason enough on it's own to bash the system.

Also, Logicwins is 100% spot on as is Neko

Show all comments (72)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
21d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted20d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8520d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele20d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla20d ago (Edited 20d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk20d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay20d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 20d ago
Athlon10120d ago (Edited 20d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit20d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg19d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10119d ago (Edited 19d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14920d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
33d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_33d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle33d ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker33d ago (Edited 33d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit33d ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog33d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_33d ago (Edited 33d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog33d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad33d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_33d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage33d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda33d ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

33d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
40°

Sony Shows Off 20 Minutes of Crimson Desert on a Base PS5

Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
BlazedKong59d ago

looks god awful on the base systems