Razer's Battlefield 3 controller for Xbox 360, adjustable and programmable

gw4k5395d ago

I think I will just stick with the regular controller!

Reply Agree 2 Disagree 1

bruddahmanmatt5395d ago

"It comes with two extra buttons and shiny lights." Look at how hard it was to type that without inserting all sorts of garbage like "OMG IT COMES WITH A 15' CABLE, AND NOT JUST ANY CABLE, A LIGHTWEIGHT CABLE...BRAIDED TOO".

Reply Agree 1 Disagree 1

Reply Agree 2 Disagree 12

ginsunuva5395d ago

The last platform anyone should be playing bf3 on.

BISHOP-BRASIL5394d ago

I see for your comments you are a PS3 gamer like me and let me tell you that: you cocky PS3 owners are as bad as PC elitists and 360 nitpickers.

A good game is a good game regardless of platform. Battlefield 3 will be just as good of a game regardless of controller, framerate, resolution, infrastructure and any other differences unless it's broken, which we can't tell so far. The main content, the game, don't change.

Now with internet everyone keeps comparing versions, which is ok, but people are now more interested in complaining about ridiculous minimum stuff than enjoying the games. What's wrong with you people?

ginsunuva5394d ago

I meant that this should be played on pc. I am a PS fan, but I know for a fact the console versions can't compare to the pc version.
The console versions are just for extra money making for people who don't know better.

Agree 0 Disagree 0

BISHOP-BRASIL5394d ago

Still just confirmed what I said... Oh please enlighten me of how will be the experience on PC oh so different?

Graphics? Are you really going to play BF3 just because of resolution, framerate and what not? Might as well stop at the videos...

Destruction? Although better detailed in PC, destruction is still present on consoles, none the less it's part of the experience in both campaing and multiplayer all the same as previously stated by DICE.

Controller? It's up to preference, don't matter how much you argue K/M to be better, most console gamers just prefer gamepads.

Mods? It's not even part of the game, not made by the original developer, you won't get a glimpse of it unless you actively look for it. I can understand using mods to enhance a good game you bought after you're done with it, but would you buy a bad game to see if good mods come later? And unless it would of be a bad game there's no logical reason to avoid it. If the game itself is good than it should be good in all platforms.

The only game changer that could arguably appear is number of players online, but is that alone enough reason to avoid a game?

Obviously the game can release and we discover one version is broken, for all we know PC could have some stupid DRM that put's you away from playing it too! But we don't know it yet, there's no reason as of now to not avoid it in any platform.

Agree 0 Disagree 0

FGHFGHFGH5394d ago

well 64 players is THE reason. 12vs12 w 4 tanks and 4 jets leaves like 2 or 3 infantry per side.

Agree 0 Disagree 0

Hufandpuf5395d ago

This controller works perfectly fine, the programmable buttons make it so that I don't even need to press the face buttons when I'm in a firefight. All the basic functions can be remapped to the 4 shoulder and 2 trigger buttons on the top. That means I don't ever have to take my finger off of the aiming joystick.

Otherwords, it's almost as good as a mouse and keyboard (Which is what the controller is supposed to replicate).

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 1

Show all comments (12)

80°

Battlefield 3 Cut Missions From Campaign Detailed by Former DICE Dev

excaliburps|503d ago |News|3|

Battlefield 3's former Lead Designer has revealed that there were two cut missions from the main campaign

Battlefield 3 PC PS3 Xbox 360 mp1st.com

Read Full Story >>

mp1st.com

- Comments (3)

XiNatsuDragnel503d ago

I wish someone can get those EA game leaks to see all the cut content ngl

anast503d ago

Get rid of campaigns, move the game to mobile, and try to compete with warzone. They would save time and money.

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 7

Johnh5223503d ago (Edited 503d ago )

Bf4 was fun hope the new bf is just as good.

Battlefield 3 Battlefield: Bad Company 2 PC PS3 Xbox 360 gamerant.com

100°

Battlefield Needs the Glory Days of BF3 and Bad Company 2 Back

FallenAngel1984|1288d ago |Opinion piece|22|

Whether it comes through remakes or a new game with a similar style, DICE should aim to revive the glory days of Battlefield 3 and Bad Company 2.

Read Full Story >>

gamerant.com

- Comments (22)

Expand all

masterfox1288d ago

hmmm I think there will be no old BF glory days for EA since they are loyal to their greediness and laziness :D

Reply Agree 9 Disagree 0

Knightofelemia1288d ago

You're asking for a miracle with EA that will never happen unless they can exploit the money making schemes behind it.

Reply Agree 5 Disagree 0

MadLad1288d ago

We'll see what happens now that Zampella is overlooking the series.

Reply Agree 3 Disagree 2

1288d ago

Replies(1)

Father__Merrin1288d ago

Anyone that wants to plat bf3 you can still go ahead and play it

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 5

Psychotica1288d ago

Why are they so reluctant to create a new Bad Company??

Reply Agree 2 Disagree 0

INMATEofARKHAM1288d ago

Single player campaigns take time and effort... EA ain't got time for that.

Fluke_Skywalker1288d ago

DICE have already stated that they actually don't know how to. They literally have no idea what made BC2 so good and clearly have no idea how to repeat it.

Yui_Suzumiya1288d ago

Definitely agree with the title. If they make Bad Company 3 then that would definitely be a step in the right direction!

ChubbyBlade1288d ago

It’s done. The current development team has no idea why people liked BF.

Reply Agree 4 Disagree 0

CorndogBurglar1288d ago

Which is so ignorant it almost physically hurts.

They have the damn templates lol. Everyone LOVED Battlefield all the way up through BF4. Everything after BF4 is where fans started getting divided because they started dumbing down the gameplay.

So they need to go back to the favorites. Bad Company 2. BF3 and BF4.

Take those games. Take the exact same gameplay. Update the graphics. Add some different game modes. Make new maps. Add new guns. Choose two armies. And make a single player campaign.

That's seriously it. They need to quit trying to make BF something it isn't. They have everything they need. Why they can't figure this out just hurts my brain trying to understand.

Orchard1288d ago

BF3? They need to go back to BF2 for the mainline. Heck, I'd settle for true-to-source remakes of BF2 and BC2 (w/ Vietnam). Everything they've done in the 'modern' era is just bad.

CorndogBurglar1288d ago

Anything from BF2 - BF4 would work fine. Those were all great games.

MadLad1288d ago

I thought BF3 and 4 were great, and I've been playing since 1942.

Demetrius1288d ago (Edited 1288d ago )

Doubt they will smh which is messed up

TheColbertinator1288d ago

EAis pretending to be one of those deaf mutes

Profchaos1288d ago

I've not played 2042 myself but after v I don't feel like it. I played a few hours of v with friends but it feels ultra sterile I can't figure it out but the game looks and feels clinical. The storys in the campaign were also bland and uninteresting and felt like a dull trudge through checkpoints as you waited for an ending.

I've played the franchise dating back to it's original PC launch and PS2 spin off games I did enjoy 1 overall and it's take on placing you in different scenarios and battles was interesting but not all that good imo as you couldn't really connect with any characters longer than 2 hours.

hardline for all the hate it recived was a fun story and a new take but a bad mp game

I feel like v overall was the turning point and instead of showing the gritty reality of war they turned everything sterile and presented it in a clean cut boring frame in order to pump it full of weird micro transactions overall they spent far to much time on trying to implant ray tracing and other graphical flourishes and forgot to make the game enjoyable