All Channels
Popular
150°

Far Cry 3 dev: single and multiplayer will "blur together" in future

OXM UK: "Keeping campaign and online separate is a dated approach, reckons outspoken Ubisoft veteran."

dirigiblebill5384d ago

I think more asynchronous stuff would be cool, but I'd hate to see actual, you know, multiplayer bleeding into my campaign.

Sharingan_no_Kakashi5383d ago (Edited 5383d ago )

Same. That's the only thing I didn't like about Demon's Souls. People butting in and just ruining an already difficult game. I purposely stayed dead through most of the game just to avoid interruptions.

DaTruth5383d ago (Edited 5383d ago )

Me too! And I would shut off the network when I got to the Yellow Demon, so I wouldn't have to face an online opponent!

I wouldn't care, but losing 200,000 souls really sucks and red phantoms come equipped to fight real players with their cheap Scraping Spear, while I come equipped to face a level!

"$hit, I left my Northern Regalia in my other pants"

DaCajun5383d ago (Edited 5383d ago )

I did like how a friend could join you to help you out in Demons Souls but I shut my network off too to keep out invaders because it got to the point every time I jump in a level I would keep getting one after another. I fought 6 back to back on one level the moment I entered and couldn't play through the level due to having fight them plus the enemies on the level. So I just cut the connection to the network every time I played except when I was a soul to help another player.

I don't mind online co-ops. Far Cry 2 would have been a 100x better if it was a jump in jump out co-op with a friend especially driving around a jeep then enemy guards start chasing you in another jeep and they have a gunner but you can't drive and shot back at the same time. Plus it would have made the long treks back and forth across the huge map with regenerating guard post less of a pain with some help from a buddy instead of the stupid AI they had help occasionally.

With this guy talking about this maybe they will put in co-op for the campaign in FC3.

WolfLeBlack5383d ago

Brink gave it a hearty attempt, but didn't quite manage to blend the two together. Though, I think that was more due to the difficulty in telling a compelling story throughout both single player and multiplayer.

wallis5383d ago

left4dead is a great example of a singleplayer like experience in a multiplayer template.

But honestly I'm not sure I want the same people who tea bag me to play a major role in my single player experience.

Stealth2k5383d ago (Edited 5383d ago )

whats dated is shoe horning multiplayer in and ruining the game overall like farcry 2.........

Single player stories are where its at

Quagmire5383d ago

Agreed, althought look at what thatgamecompany is doing with Journey. Its not so much shoe-horning as it is amplifying the sense of actually going on a journey and meeting random strangers in the middle of nowhere.

Thats how developers should blend MP and SP together, not by merely tacking it on at the expense of the SP.

Skate-AK5383d ago

I disagree, there will always be the need for a single player only game.

dirigiblebill5383d ago

...at least till they invent a class of gamer who's prepared to role-play properly rather than killing friendly NPCs/stealing your power-ups/Ramboing constantly, etc.

Show all comments (13)
50°

Far Cry 3 60 FPS Trailer

The new trailer for the free 60 FPS update is here.

TriniOutsider112d ago

I'm happy with Part 3 & Blood Dragon getting the 60FPS treatment. I'll eventually try Primal, maybe this weekend.

240°

Far Cry Has Become A Shadow Of Its Former Self

Following a series of repetitive games, a formulaic approach, and a disappointing last entry, the Far Cry series has been run into the ground.

Read Full Story >>
tech4gamers.com
JEECE660d ago

The trouble with most criticisms of this franchise is that they insist Far Cry 3 was the best game, but the things they claim to hate about the franchise are all the elements that 3 introduced.

Deeeeznuuuts660d ago

Couldn't agree with you more! I've always thought that, my personal favourite is two, the whole atmosphere, mystery, adrenaline, my vehicle steaming up because I've crashed too many times trying to escape and then getting in a shootout, having to pull a bullet out my arm while fire rages and bullets fly, can't beat it

JEECE660d ago

Yep, 2 is my favorite by far as well, and one of my favorite singleplayer games of all time. It was probably one of the last games Ubisoft made before they started homogenizing their franchises to be open world collect-a-thons with unnecessary RPG mechanics tacked on. I enjoyed 3 for what it was, but it was clearly an attempt to make the franchise appeal to a mass audience (which, in fairness, was successful).

LucasRuinedChildhood660d ago

That's not the issue. If Far Cry 3 never existed and they just made another 5 or 6 games that were increasingly generic copies of Far Cry 2 instead, would that make FC2 the real problem?

No. It's the lack of creativity and effort that followed that's the real issue.

And there are things that are genuinely different about FC3. Simple example - the story was easily the best. Best main villain by far too but it also has strong themes and wasn't afraid to explore controversial topics. The sequels are much blander.

Comparing the fun and creativity of Blood Dragon to the DLC in the sequels ... also says a lot about how Ubisoft fell off.

-Foxtrot660d ago

Yeah like even Far Cry 4 was decent, not as great as FC3 but they still gave us an interesting story, setting and villain. Pagan Min's random calls to Ajay were pretty funny.

They just got lazier and lazier, pumping them out while making it a little more streamlined each time. I mean Jesus, they gave us a silent protagonist with FC5 which really hurt the main story and are obsessed with pleasing everyone by trying to do two characters, male and female rather than just settling on one to tell the best story they can.

neutralgamer1992660d ago

I started FC6 and yes the game works fine but I just wssnt Fun. Do many Ubi games are huge playgrounds but feel empty and doesn't give the feeling of a world which is lived in

JEECE659d ago

I have found that the more recent FC games work better as what I call "background games." Basically what I mean is it's nice to have an active save in one of them going for those times you have 45 minutes to play games and just want to have fun and don't want to get bogged down playing a game online or starting a new game and spending all your time into an annoying tutorial. Like I haven't touched FC4 in years but I know if I had 30 minutes to an hour to play I could hop in and easily be back in the swing of things and attack an outpost and have a good time.

I think a lot of people use big RPGs like Skyrim or Cyberpunk in a similar way.

isarai660d ago

Yes because FC3 executed those aspects better. Every game since FC3 has just been Frankensteined off the bones of FC3 with half the effort.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 659d ago
Michiel1989660d ago

you could say it's a far cry from what it was

wesnytsfs660d ago

Ubisoft gets a lot of hate for their content filling of maps. Personally I enjoy the mechanic when i play an open world game I like revealing hte entire map and doing all the side mission stuff before i go into main missions. Far Cry and the RPG AC maps where a joy to play.

RaidenBlack660d ago

Far Cry 2 was soo unique ... it was ahead of its time and is often misunderstood (thank you Clint Hocking, can't wait for his next game Assassins Creed Hexe)
(yes, FC2 was a departure from from FC1, so in strictest sense, Crysis 1 & 3 are the truer successors)

JEECE660d ago

Yep. Unfortunately there has been so little since then that has scratched the same itch. Really the closest thing has been BOTW, which uses a lot of similar systems (though ironically FC2 came out before Ubisoft put the Assassin's Creed towers in Far Cry, while BOTW had Ubi towers). Obviously it isn't a shooter though. I keep hoping that that some indie dev will put an FC2-esque game out on Steam, but so far I've been left wanting.

Sircolby45660d ago

I actually enjoyed Far Cry 5 and New Dawn. Far Cry 6 was a joke. It was a step backwards in every way. That was probably the worst Far Cry I have ever played.

Show all comments (26)
80°

Why Far Cry 3 Was The Best Of The Franchise?

Far Cry 3, an open-world masterpiece that redefined the series. Gameplay and storyline makes it a timeless classic that still inspires today.

Read Full Story >>
tech4gamers.com
Deeeeznuuuts693d ago

It's gotta be Far Cry 2 for me, the feeling of that game I'm still yet to find again, just everything about it, I'd kill for a remaster, I'd even be happy with just a bump in resolution and frame rate, occasionally go back to it, think I'm gunna have to do just that now 😂

porkChop693d ago

A remaster of Far Cry 2 would be amazing, especially with the mods that fixed the broken stealth system and the dumb checkpoint respawns. Include those fixes and it would be a huge upgrade over the original.

JEECE693d ago

Enemies respawn in Far Cry 2? Terrible! It's a broken system! Make me a one-man army who can inexplicably hold an entire region!

Enemies respawn in Dark Souls and Zelda? Brilliant! So much more hardcore! Glad the devs took risks!

porkChop693d ago

The problem isn't them respawning. It's that they respawned after just 5 minutes. Like you'd still be in the area looking for diamonds, loot, exploring, etc, and the enemies would just respawn with you there.