All Channels
Popular
270°

HD-DVD better value than Blu-Ray ?

Neither format will be going anywhere for a while thanks to the fact that the discs themselves are the same size, along with Warner's dual-disc format, so neither really trumps the other, but the cheapest Blu-Ray player still stands at $499.99, while the A3 is still only $299.99. Image quality between the two is identical (provided you're viewing it at the same resolution, obviously) and from what discerning ears can tell, the audio quality on HD-DVD is generally better.

Read Full Story >>
media.www.thetraveleronline.com
Mr Marbles6801d ago

Good idea, to grab a cheap HDDVD player for now and just wait out the war. When its over pick up a really good version of the winner, or pick up a dual format player on down the road.

Personally I think both formats wil survive, and dual format players will rule the land.

cuco336801d ago

I do believe that we will see what I have been saying for months on end... Purple is the way. Embrace both. Be a movie fanboy, not a format fanboy.

BLlNK6801d ago

Bluray is releasing a 100 gig disc soon. And bluray like many have said is the next format. I think what will decide the victor will be which studios ar exclusive to each format. Disney is staying exclusive to Bluray and that a big deal. Many others that I can not think of but are as important. Time will tell. I am a Bluray supporter.

cuco336801d ago (Edited 6801d ago )

How does 100gb disc benefit MOVIES?!?!
Last I checked most films fit on single layer disks for both formats, a good amount are on dual layer with plenty of space. Dual layer as in 30gb & 50gb. 100gb is NOT NEEDED for high def movies. It is a pissing contest and relevant to Blu-ray for where it started, as a storage medium for the PC market, NOT for movies. Sure you can pack an entire season onto 1 x 100gb disc but it'll cost more to the studio (which in turn costs more to the consumer) and studios know that more discs give the added perception for better value.

Embrace both & go purple. You are only jooking yourself from great movies in high def from the other side.

To below: I take it you have magical golden ears and an expensive home theater set at home to be able to tell the difference between HIGH QUALITY COMPRESSED audio and one that's not compressed. Please, the film SOUNDS excellent and all you need for proof is ALL the reviews that gave the audio track perfect scores from 5/5 to 10/10. Besides, do you know how much they packed into the film? To end, did you even look at the audio score from the very link you posted? I'll give you a hint: 5/5.
And based on your name as well as avatar, I only have one thing for you... run along now troll...

RRoDx3606801d ago

Is that why HD-DVD Transformers couldn't have uncompressed PCM or Dolby TrueHD audio? (Hint: Because there wasn't enough space.)

"-why no Dolby TrueHD or uncompressed PCM? The studio's answer was that due to space limitations on the disc..."

http://hddvd.highdefdigest....

pornflakes6801d ago (Edited 6801d ago )

Jep.

Like with DVD+R and -R. If we look JUST on standalone sales, not inlcuded the PS3 for Blu Ray, then HD-DVD would be the winner.

OF COURSE, somebody who has a PS3 will buy Blu Ray movie to watch a HD film.

But at the end the price will win, the casual consumer always decided the war.

Edit: And 100GB Blu ray isnt relevant for the film industry. You can watch TRUE HD sound in full HD option just with 15 GB.
If we talk about High Defenition standart then dont bringt this crap like 100GB. The 50GB HD-DVD also wont be needed at all.

titntin6801d ago

Very poor article, with some very obvious inaccuracies.

Its quite obvious that the PS3 is a extremely good Bray player with exceptional video output circuitry, and this is available at a cheaper price than he quoted for a blue ray player.

..and its also a matter of record that HDdvd's don't have space for full uncompressed audio, while Bray does, so the ultimate audio quality of the format will be superiror (if you have the set up).

I've no probelm with his own opinions and suggestions, but its worrying when things are stated that a factually inaccurate!

OMG 360 RUL3Z0RZ FTW6801d ago

Realistically, less than 1 person in 100 will ever notice or care about that difference. It's not like HD-DVD audio sounds like it's coming out of a megaphone.

There are two things that Joe Sixpack will appreciate about HD-DVD, as compared to Bluray:
1. The name. It has "HD" in it. That alone could sway middle-America when it is time for mass adoption of a format.
2. Price. Even though the PS3 is a lower cost Bluray player, entry level HD-DVD players are still cheaper at the moment.

kreetah6801d ago

But is Joe six pack going to buy a cheap player and disreguard movie prices? Until Movies as CLOSE to the price of a DVD in cost J6P is not buying in.

pornflakes6801d ago

Yeah its like "haha PS3 has hdmi 1.3"

Does anyboy has 13.1 @ home??

Nobody even 1% of the world in the next ten years will use 13.1 SOund System.

Mainman6801d ago

13.1? Lol, it doesn't go higher than 7.1.

xplosneer6801d ago

1.3 doesn't mean 13 speakers, it means it has uncompressed sound with better codecs.

Show all comments (36)
30°

Top Racers Need Top Gear – Introducing the Forza Horizon 6 Limited Edition Controller and Headset

Omar writes: "With the Horizon Festival coming to breathtaking Japan, you’ll need the essential gear to prove you’ve got what it takes to become a Horizon Legend as you cruise, drift and explore an open world full of spectacular driving experiences. That’s why we’re happy to announce the newest Limited Edition Xbox Wireless Controller and Wireless Headset collection, featuring inspired designs from Forza Horizon 6. The bright cyan and lime colorways celebrate the Horizon Festival’s recognition of iconic cars and hit music, with special features that are sure to impress any collector."

Read Full Story >>
news.xbox.com
Killer2020UK63d ago

Oh my, that is one gaudy design

40°

EasySMX D05 review

You can get Hall effect controllers slightly cheaper, but you'd struggle to find as feature-rich a package without some heavy, heavy sales.

70°

"It's Just So Lame" - RTGI Modder Thinks DLSS 5 Is Impressive But Shares AI Slop Sentiment

Pascal Gilcher calls DLSS 5 impressive but shares the "AI slop" sentiment, explaining the likely tech behind it and why he dislikes it.

Read Full Story >>
wccftech.com
CrimsonWing6989d ago

I fail to see how this is AI shhhhlllloooop. Looking at the different games they showed, this has made many of them look far better.

isarai_lee89d ago (Edited 89d ago )

It's AI slop because it ignores the artists intent and changes the details ESPECIALLY when it comes to character faces. The scariest part of it is introducing it as the next stage of DLSS, a feature where the current iteration already has controversy surrounding it and for quite a lot of games cannot be fully disabled. So reasonably the precident is already set for what path this could take, and it's not good

blacktiger89d ago

In case you didn't watch the video then let me point just one part. It overrides the lighting. Then the question of what is the point of ray tracing cost and so on. Many of the lighting deletes shadow, including shadow on the face like eyes even chin.

Chard89d ago

Why stop at art when it comes to human input - why not just have AI play the game for us, remove human input altogether

theshizer89d ago

If you don’t like it, just don’t enable it. Personally I think it looks great from the videos I have seen.

isarai_lee89d ago

And what about when you can't? Cause there's plenty of games where you cannot fully disable dlss already, i mean we're well into an era where it's a major crutch for developers to cover up their cut corners, why would this be any different?

blacktiger89d ago

You are playing with people's money and allow Nvidia to scam you.

In case you didn't watch the video then let me point just one part. It overrides the lighting. Then the question of what is the point of ray tracing cost. This is all lie to raise the cost of the graphic card.

Andrew33689d ago

Making characters look more realistic not ok because we want the developer to decide on how the game was intended to look. - Internet

Change entire game through mods thus changing how the developers intended the game to be is ok. - Internet

isarai_lee89d ago

Something consumers can do to a product after they have purchased it, entirely optional and can always be undone with a fresh install

VS

The leading gaming hardware manufacturer making this the next iteration of the main AA/Upscaling technique that is heavily relied upod by modern devs and is not optional in most games.

Not at all the same but nice try

jwillj2k489d ago

At the moment you need 2 5090’s just to get an image on the screen so this is all vaporware until proven otherwise.

Andrew33689d ago

The good news is you can just not use it as well.

Christopher89d ago

It's all about choice in the end. But, I would say that calling it 'more realistic' is quite a stretch. It looks like AI art, and that's rarely realistic.

Urrakia3489d ago

All the comments I see are reminding me of how we got to the current state of gaming when microtransactions were first introduced: "It's completely optional guys, we promise! If you don't like it just don't buy it!"

I think we all know how that ended up.

Popsicle89d ago (Edited 89d ago )

I had the same exact thought the first time this was brought up in a separate article about a week ago. Took me straight back to the conversations surrounding “horse armor.” Just don’t buy it they said. Years later, many IPs I previously enjoyed are so infected with monetization schemes that I don’t even consider purchasing them anymore.

DLSS 5 and the like are the same thing wrapped in a different package. History rhymes but many of us never learn from it.

blacktiger89d ago

Biggest Scam. Overrides lighting and shadow. So why keep Ray tracing? It's all a scam to raise graphic card. We now see Nvidia with Microsoft downturn anything against them. Sony is next!