This is why I hate Crytek, they boast all the time. It's also why I dislike Ninja theory

shut the fuck up and make a decent game already

lol maybe Crytek is not very well informed, but a LOT of engines are better then UE3 ( at least on consoles, I don' t know much of PC ).

Prove it's the best by making better games Crytek. I haven't played any of your games this year except the Crysis 2 beta and the demo which was removed.

looks a lot better than the unreal engine, unreal is over used at this point, its boring and predictable

CryEngine does what UnrealEngine doesn't

Unreal Engine awesome but is getting a bit tired because everyone uses it, and not necessarily all that well.

CryEngine is great as well but I feel CryTek has too much of a comfort zone. The whole jungle thing doesn't really show their potential.

On 360 CryEngine is the worst, seriously.

It's the only engine that produces a weird graphical defect where lines go across the screen like a bad cable reception and the grain turns into huge rectangular blocks.

There's a 113 page thread with people complaining their game looks like crap on the Crysis 2 360 forum with video proof from multiple users.

Unreal looks better simply due to being much crisper and cleaner and lack major graphical bugs.

Cryengine sadly kinda sucks on consoles:
- 360 has grain/lines bug
- PS3 sub HD

All good to do the talking crytek but end of day gamers want the games. Unreal engibe is old as dirt now but it has a massive catalogue of games to back it up, Means though its old it still is current because theres always new stuff being released for it. Cryengine outside of Crysis is still very much dead in the water except for sniper ghost warrior 2 warface and the promises.

Unreal engine is usable by nearly everyone and it is a great engine (look at Batman Arkham Asylum)

This guy can say s*** like this and get away with it. Why? Dumbasses in the media hyped up Crysis 2 by calling it the best looking game on consoles, despite evidence to the contrary....

unreal engine is shit, it was cool back in 2000 when it was relatively new, now its old and repetitive.

LMAO these guys again!!!!!!!! Hey crytek please stop talking if your engine is that amazing why does Killzone 3 blows crysis 2 away on the PS3 and Gears 3 looks miles better then crysis 2!!

If they continued with the route which they were going with with the CryEngine 2, I would agree with them. As soon as the have taken the jump to consoles, they no longer have a chance at beating the Unreal Engine.

CryEngine is dead, move on people...

Empty vessels sound more ... crytek din make this much fuss when their cryengine 2 shined ..... this time they r trying to resurrect that dead ce3 out of the shit ...

Funny, because Crysis 2 was plain garbage. How many people are playing it now? Ah, exactly. Overhyped and unexciting. There are far better shooters out there using "inferior" engines.

frostbite 2 engine does what cryengine cant!

Maybe the full quote is "CryEngine is the best engine we have made."? There are better engines made by others for sure.

I don't know what a lot of you people are complaining about with Crysis 2. I played it on the ps3 and the PC, and it was great on both. My computer isn't the best, and the PC version kicked my ass, but it was playable and fun. The ps3 version was great, and I thought the graphics was very impressive for the ps3.

The only complaint I could understand is a weaker story, but that's never been the focus of Crysis. An open world game wouldn't have worked with the story.

Even the multiplayer is solid; I put a good number of hours into it.

Just because it's not Crysis 1 with new graphics and story doesn't mean it wasn't good.

Well crysis 2 is currently the best looking game out there. Just look at it with Dx11 and the new Blackfire 2 mod and tell me its not mind blowing.

Crytek annoy the hell out of me. They seem convinced that the only thing that matters about a game is how impressive the engine technology is. Meanwhile, they spend all their time making (gorgeous looking) shitty games.

I can appreciate technical feats of polygon pushing but when I'm playing a game I don't give a toss what's going on under the hood.

Also, what the hell do they mean when they claim to have the "only 100% realtime engine"? There's a statement that needs some qualifiers. How are they defining realtime? Isn't *every* 3D game engine running in realtime?! Surely it's either realtime or it isn't. Is he saying their engine doesn't allow for pre-rendered cutscenes?