BF3, assasins creed, batman and uncharted 3 are the biggest games coming out this year for me. mgs collection is my runner up.

course its better on pc Battlefield is a pc game from the start, but that dose not mean the console versions will be just as enjoyable still the same game

I will get the pc version. A real battlefield game isnt limited to a few guys exchanging bullets. Its supposed to be a BATTLEFIELD.

I want the uncompromised experience so thats what im going for. Huge maps, 64 players, no jaggies, all effects on max.

If you guys are content with the console version kudos to you.

I don't think this is an article saying "ZOMG PC IS CRAP", rather that console gamers will still be getting the core experience as PC gamers. Obviously playing with a keyboard and mouse is different. Does that even need to be mentioned? Point of the article is to highlight how smaller player count online doesn't really compromise anything for the console versions, and that any increase in player count would compromise other areas of the game, such as lighting, graphics etc., and then people would start bitching about that.

sub hd vs. true hd/ultra hd

jaggies everywhere vs 16x anti aliasing

20-30 frames laggy, stuttering vs 60 frames perfect smooth

12v12 small maps vs 32v32 huge maps

crappy peer to peer multiplay vs dedicated customizable servers

pop-in vs none

screen tearing up the wazzooo vs none

agitated terrible shadowing vs perfect silky smooth soft shadows

wow....i mean....i could keep going but i am starting to feel bad for console only owners

The game is going to be awesome for people who like a good tactical shooter.

Ill be pickin it up for the xbox for the time bieng . Im starting to relize how much better pc gaming is compared to console gaming . Just got too ssave up some money and ill be ready to retire my xbox.

Why are they so reluctant to create a new Bad Company??

Definitely agree with the title. If they make Bad Company 3 then that would definitely be a step in the right direction!

It’s done. The current development team has no idea why people liked BF.

BF3? They need to go back to BF2 for the mainline. Heck, I'd settle for true-to-source remakes of BF2 and BC2 (w/ Vietnam). Everything they've done in the 'modern' era is just bad.

Doubt they will smh which is messed up

EAis pretending to be one of those deaf mutes

I've not played 2042 myself but after v I don't feel like it. I played a few hours of v with friends but it feels ultra sterile I can't figure it out but the game looks and feels clinical. The storys in the campaign were also bland and uninteresting and felt like a dull trudge through checkpoints as you waited for an ending.

I've played the franchise dating back to it's original PC launch and PS2 spin off games I did enjoy 1 overall and it's take on placing you in different scenarios and battles was interesting but not all that good imo as you couldn't really connect with any characters longer than 2 hours.

hardline for all the hate it recived was a fun story and a new take but a bad mp game

I feel like v overall was the turning point and instead of showing the gritty reality of war they turned everything sterile and presented it in a clean cut boring frame in order to pump it full of weird micro transactions overall they spent far to much time on trying to implant ray tracing and other graphical flourishes and forgot to make the game enjoyable

I mean thats all we've wanted since BF4 but they keep doing everything we don't want.