All Channels
Popular
70°

Left 4 Dead 2 Look Back - GoozerNation.com

GoozerNation.com writes, "Left 4 Dead 2 was released in November of 2009 and while it was generally well-received, it garnered a lot of criticism from those who enjoyed the original game. One of the biggest complaints was that L4D2 was released too closely to the first game. A year, almost to the date, separated the two titles."

Read Full Story >>
goozernation.com
kube005406d ago

I still have yet to play the 2nd game

MasterD9195406d ago

I enjoyed L4D2 but felt that the characters from the 1st game were just better..I also enjoyed the locations more in the 1st game too I think.

Sure they are similar...Its the same formula...Much like the Portal and Half-Life sequels.

I really hope they have scoping or iron sights for L4D3...that in my opinion is one of the major flaws.

The Matrix5405d ago (Edited 5405d ago )

I liked L4D better for that same reason but mainly for the setting. The forests of the Northeast made for a much scarier and memorable setting than the south.

MasterD9195405d ago (Edited 5405d ago )

I agree. The forests and cabins and darkness of the maps (all at night if I'm not mistaken) just worked better. And if you are going to do the south- they should have done Texas. I think that would work great. I hope they pick better locations for the inevitable 3rd.

edit: the only scoping I'm aware of is on the Sniper or Rifle, no other guns. So why not the rest?

Ducky5405d ago (Edited 5405d ago )

I thought they already had scoping.

I don't think any Valve game has ever had iron sights. Hip-firing keeps things fast-paced, but I suppose having options is always nice.

As for the levels, L4D1 had better levels, mostly because they were darker. L4D2 felt too bright... with the flashlight being only necessary in a few spots.

puffkix5405d ago

Couch co-op is such a selling point for me.

Raven_Nomad5405d ago

I still play L4D2 on my 360 with some of my clan mates every week.

I liked L4D1 better but part 2 isn't without it's perks. Still quite a good/large community on both games still. As far as I'm concerned Valves only good games have been the L4D games.

I know people will hate my opinion, but I have found all their other games vastly overrated. Especially the likes of Portal and Half Life. I've never been able to make it through either of those games fully..... and oh how I tried...

solidsnake2225405d ago

I preferred the first for sure, but 2 wasn't bad.

70°

OG Left 4 Dead Creator Announces He's Working On A New Multiplayer Shooter

Following Left 4 Dead's undying legacy, the developer of the game shares that a new likewise project is in the works.

ZycoFox256d ago

L4D had potential to be so much more. The issue was that the release of the second game just one year after the first added a decent amount of content which was much needed, then there was nothing except for a few small content updates spread far between.

This is one of the only games I can think of that benefits from a yearly release, or at least a yearly DLC so it doesn't split the player base.

The games just got too samey and lack content.. it's a shame they didn't keep up the pace, I know you can download new maps but it doesn't change the overall game or add new enemies etc.

-Foxtrot255d ago

Regardless of what Valve officially said they didn’t need to do a sequel that fast, things could have easily been added to the original overtime and the sad thing is the characters and atmosphere of the original was better than the sequel. I mean we went from the dark, grim city streets to the sunny south where we are hitting massive menacing tanks with frying pans.

I honestly believe Valve killed it because it was a Turtle Rock game at its core and Valve wanted it to be known as an Valve only IP moving forward

They even brought back the original survivors just to kill one of them off (even though in the original they were heading North to Canada)

JEECE255d ago

Lol L4D2 came out in 2009, and you are saying it should have been a 2020s type live service game. It's just a great game, it doesn't need battle passes and skins.

This attitude is why devs are afraid to make any multiplayer game that isn't a live service.

Jingsing255d ago (Edited 255d ago )

Also in these current economic times live services is just a no go when people are being more frugal with their purchasing power. I don't do any subscription services anymore which means I can't do multiplayer on a console even if I wanted too. Something the console manufacturers should think about if they want to get players to even try their online stuff.

70°

Top Horde Shooters Your Squad Should Play

The Guide Hall explores the top horde shooters that co-op fans should be playing this year before the upcoming launch of Warhammer 40,000: Space Marine 2!

Read Full Story >>
theguidehall.com
130°

Looking Back At 2008, An Unbelievably Incredible Year Of Video Game Releases

Huzaifa from eXputer: "2008 was home to the likes of Call of Duty: World at War, Dead Space, GTA 4, Far Cry 2, Left 4 Dead, and many other hits, which is outright remarkable."

ChasterMies748d ago

Some of these low paid video game “news” writers weren’t born before 2007.

just_looken748d ago

Here here

Those that were around before 2000's i am sure are like me that think we entered a world of non readers or those that follow without question.

I can not wait to see fallout 3 a goty game even though it was about water with non content until you add the dlc/updates then you got the performance/crashing

CrimsonWing69749d ago

I don’t think anything can compare to 2023

lucasnooker749d ago

1998 - the best year in gaming! Metal gear solid, crash bandicoot 3, medievil, half life, ocarina of time, thief, tenchu, resident evil 2, Spyro, tomb raider 3, oddworld abes exodus, banjo kazooie.

It was a different breed of a gaming era. You’ll never understand what it was like back then. The aura of gaming, it was different!

KyRo749d ago (Edited 749d ago )

I second this. Gaming was a lot more varied and fun than it is today. I'm 35 so getting on compared to some here but I got to see all the changes from NES up to now but I've never felt so disappointed in any generation than I have this current gen. I was expecting more from this generation rather than prettier versions of games that came before it. Game mechanics have become so refined that alot of games feel the same and has done for a while now.

Maybe it's time to have a break for a while. I love gaming but I don't feel I get much fun in the traditional sense out of it anymore.

CrimsonWing69749d ago (Edited 749d ago )

Metal Gear Solid, Resident Evil 2, Abe’s Exodus, and Ocarina of Time are the only things from that list that I liked.

Here’s the 2023 game releases that I personally liked… and big releases that I didn’t care for:

- Dead Space Remake
- Wo Long Dynatsy
- Resident Evil 4 Remake
- Diablo 4
- Fire Emblem Engage
- Hogwarts Legcay
- Street Fighter 6
- Hi-Fi Rush
- Like a Dragon: Ishin
- Octopath Traveler 2
- Final Fantasy Pixel Remasters
- Final Fanatsy XVI (actually ended up not liking this, but it was still a big deal release)
- Baldur’s Gate 3
- Armored Core VI: Fires of Rubicon
- Lies of P
- Mortal Kombat 1
- Marvel’s Spider-Man 2
- Starfield (Ended up hating this one, but big release)
- Super Mario Bros. Wonder
- Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom (I’m an old-school Zelda fan, but didn’t really enjoy this game)
- Alan Wake 2

I mean, honestly I’ve never seen a year of major IP releases like that, ever.

Profchaos748d ago (Edited 748d ago )

Isn't it just a generational thing realistically.

I've been gaming since way back and I some of my favourite games go as far back as the late 80s for me each generation has a year or two of game changing releases one after another before an inevitable dry spell.

I kind of agree gaming had a different feel games hit different because we didn't have the internet nothing got spoiled and you really had to put in the effort to beat a puzzle which could set entire groups of people looking for a solution. But most importantly games were experimental and not as cookie cutter as today even basics like controls were not universal today r2 is shoot l2 is ads garunteed you can't deviate from that in a shooter back then it could of been square, R1 or R1 and circle nothing was standard.

But as time moves on a new generation picks up their controller they are going to be interested in different things that PS1 demo disc with the t Rex blew our primitive 16 bit brains back on launch but to kids today it's laughable.
The new gen of kids coming into to hobby seem to value different things to us there seems to be a huge focus on online play, streamers, gaming personalities, and social experiences, convience of digital downloads. To me I value none of that but that's ok like my parents not liking the band's I would listen to its just the natural cycle.

Gameseeker_Frampt748d ago

Just about every year in the 7th generation was great and something we most likely won't experience again.

2009 for example had Assassin's Creed 2, Batman: Arkham Asylum, Dragon Age: Origins, Uncharted 2, Halo 3: ODST, Killzone 2, Borderlands, Bayonetta, and Demon's Souls to name a few.

just_looken748d ago

It still amazes me we got over 7 rockstar games ps2/ps3 but 3 for the ps3/ps4/ps5

Dragon age 1-3 and mass effect 1-3 in 7ish years what a generation.