
There's been no shortage of controversial news swirling around Capcom this week, but this one might take the cake. Apparently, a spokesman for the company alluded to the fact that Capcom can basically do what they want without regard for the fans when it comes to choosing which new characters to put in Ultimate Marvel vs Capcom 3.

All 21 Classic Games are playable for a limited time 🎮

Jason Dietz: "We reveal the past year's best and worst video game publishers (based on their 2025 releases) in the 16th edition of our annual Game Publisher Rankings."
But... but... the garbage-mongers always tell us that Square Enix is in trouble! 😂

Capcom has clarified its current stance on generative AI in its videogames. The major Japanese publisher and developer behind popular series like Resident Evil, Street Fighter, and Monster Hunter has revealed that while it doesn't use gen-AI assets in their games, it is exploring ways to use generative AI to streamline the game development process.
Using Artificial Intelligence (more like Realistic Stupidity) art assets in your games is a great way to get people to boycott your product. We don't need that ugly, unsophisticated, generic, fake art in our games, good on CAPCOM for not using that garbage.
Naw you can't fool us, You work with Nvidia, that's a fact! And here you wanted to advertise but now look stupid!
"He also states that if Capcom "wants to include Firebrand and not Mega Man," based on what it believes may make a more balanced videogame, it can do that, because Capcom is making the game. "Not the fans."
Didn't they ask fans who they wanted to see as DLC. They had a thread on the forums. 6 characters for Marvel and 6 for Capcom who you wanted to see as DLC
This article fails 'cuz it took Jim Sterling seriously.
Ok, I suppose they don't need my "permission".
Do they need my money?
are we gonna see 5 releases of MVC3 like street fighter 4
money grabbing at its best
No permission
No money
Don't like it? stop making games.