All Channels
Popular
270°

Sony: PS3 3D Headset support “exciting”

Sony are already experimenting with PS3 support for their new virtual reality 3D headset, Sony’s Mick Hocking said at his Develop 2011 keynote on 3D today in Brighton – and FPS headtracking is just one of the exciting possibilities the device opens up.

Read Full Story >>
beefjack.com
RedDragan5466d ago

Headtracking is cool... but no 3D if you are blind in one eye, like my niece.

We wish for holographic displays, not the glasses type two eye piece rubbish.

zootang5466d ago (Edited 5466d ago )

I wish for a Portal device but it's not like it is going to happen any time soon. If this is the next step in the progression then I will more than welcome it!

Next up, controllers for one handed people and surround sound for people with only one good ear.

arjman5466d ago

With all due respect for your niece, she represents a minority and I would welcome a 3d headset with open arms

RedDragan5465d ago

So would I, and my niece would probably accept this as well because of the freedom involved in such a gadget.

However holographic displays have been available for a quite a few years now and it allows people with one good eye to feel a sense of depth like that in reality.

It just annoys me how companies will exploit an old technology for as long as they possibly can without pushing the boundary.

We all would love the hologrpahic display in a headset far more that two seperate eye pieces and the holographic displays do not give people with some neurological disorders the headaches they sometimes get when watching the conventional 3D technology that we have in this headset and what is used in the recent 3D revival.

@cliffbo below,

true but only to a certain extent. People blind in one eye still get a strong sense of perception. This is why people with one eye are still allowed to drive a car, their brain adapts and learns a new way to translate what they see into a representation of 3D because there is actual distances in the objects they are looking at. On screen, that is not there and hence the idea they only see 2D.

And slightly off topic, because my niece is only 5 years old she is young enough to be enrolled in a pioneering medical experiment which should be ready for trials in about 5 years. Scientists think they can grow a new optical nerve using nothing more than bone marrow from the spine (stem cells). Tests in animals show the optic nerve grew itself, meaning no intervention from a surgen... with exception to actually extracting the stem cells. Those animals were deemed to have 20/20 vision... in boths... depsite the fact when intentionally born blind in one eye usually means having poor sight in the other. It fixed everything, it even stopped the animals getting cancer in other parts of the body which also happens. They kept the animals alive and treated them well to see what was really happening in terms of medical change, the animals lived longer than their wild brethren.

The animals were rats, which live for 2 years in the wild. The test subject, despite being tested to cure blindness, lived for just over 3 years and died from natural causes (old age). They did mention though that the offspring did not inheret the long life, but the gene responsible for the blindness was completely eradicted from the gene pool.

If you have friends or family with a certain illness that gene therapy might solve, tell them to expect changes over the next 20 years. Things are going to happen that appears to be Sci-Fi even today.

cliffbo5466d ago (Edited 5466d ago )

3D is a no go for anyone who is blind in one eye eistein you need 2 eyes to see 3D what are you going to complain about next people color blind cant see color so no color games okease lol

ps totally blind people cannot see anything does this mean nobody wants gfx's ?

Christopher5466d ago

I am legally blind in one eye, but as long as my 2D options remain I don't care what they do with 3D.

I do have to admit that certain movies that film scenes in 3D, like PotC having a lot of sword pointing at the screen scenes, do annoy me as it likely does every single other person out there.

But, this isn't going to happen with video games, so that doesn't really matter.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5465d ago
THC CELL5466d ago

i cant wait i hope sony release this , Anyone see the film Gamer, can u picture home with this device lol will be awesome

Would love to see kill zone or half life use with this device or even like a little big planet game ohh this will be big if sony release this.. people say it never worked before need to back off, this is sony turn now i cant see em failing this one

5466d ago Replies(3)
Urrakia345466d ago

Wow, this sounds very exciting and also very ambitious. It has vast potential if it is used and incorporated correctly into video games.

plmkoh5466d ago

Head mounted displays are pretty interesting because they can give you the sensation of looking at a 100" screen.

Show all comments (36)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
72d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted72d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8572d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele71d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla71d ago (Edited 71d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk71d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay71d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 71d ago
Athlon10172d ago (Edited 72d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit71d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg71d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10171d ago (Edited 71d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14971d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
85d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_85d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle84d ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker85d ago (Edited 85d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit84d ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog85d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_85d ago (Edited 85d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog85d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad85d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_85d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage85d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda84d ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

85d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
40°

Sony Shows Off 20 Minutes of Crimson Desert on a Base PS5

Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
BlazedKong111d ago

looks god awful on the base systems