Well, at least Sony "gets" it. Now if only the movie industry would take cues from this mentality. I'm sick of "Rehashed idea number 2342343: 3D" everywhere I look.

Once you have a 3D you will miss it. Any game I have in 3d I no longer want to run it without it.

Some of the 3D has been quite good. Captain America did a great job with their implementation. Avatar the Game actually had 3D that is so good you will waste hours just walking and flying around looking at everything.

In the first paragraph: "There's around 838x358's worth of resolution per player"

PER PLAYER!

So, there is actually double that resolution, but the two different players are seeing their own version of the game which are being broadcast at the same time. This is on top of having twice the physics, AI, lighting, etc. happening on each individual perspective.

Honestly, what ND is doing with Co-op 3D and maintaining the level of quality that they are... it's freaking amazing and a sign of how talented these guys are.

I don't think you're understanding the technology that is being discussed and how a 5-year old machine is able to do what it is doing due to some pretty awesome programming.

This line referrs to split-screen. It's actually similar in many ways.
But it's 896x504 per eye in 3D and 838x358 per player in splitscreen

All I'm saying is those statements that PS3 can do 3D without any compromises are bullshit and made up to bash 360. There's a lot of misinfromation going around.
There is no full uncompromised 720p for both eyes, as we could read some time ago.
You can't deny there is a significant downgrade in 3D/split screen mode. While in split screen you get both images at the same time, so it doesn't matter, they are not scaled, in 3D this 896x504 res is scaled to fullscreen and image quality takes it, but it's not only the resolution.

The GT5 implementation is pretty pointless to be honest. You need to use cockpit view to get the best from it, and in switching to 3D mode you no longer get 1080p, so it's quite a big difference.

I've yet to see U3 in 3d yet, but Super Stardust HD, Killzone 3, SOCOM 4, and Tumble all have excellent 3D.

Killzone 3 is a bit shadowy at the default level though. I tone it down a notch or two.

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

The world would be better?

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lmao!!!!