There’s no question about the fact that the teams backing the Modern Warfare 3 and Battlefield 3 games are going to argue that their respective graphics engines are better than the other. While Battlefield 3 simply will not go down without a fight, many feel that Modern Warfare 3 will have the competitive advantage and will take charge of the competition. They suggest that their console, in a nutshell, will simply outperform the rest. Whether or not this is true remains to be seen in the upcoming months.
Free for Playstation owners
Players are using hacks to gain an advantage in the game, such as aimbots and wall hacks. The first gives a player superhuman aiming abilities, while a wall hack lets you see through walls to gauge where other players are.
“These hacks are typically used by PC players, but those playing on PC via Xbox Game Pass are identified as Xbox players in multiplayer lobbies.”
This is pretty dumb to say the least.
That's a WTF, they suppose to be labeled as pc users even if its on PC game pass. They mess that up big time.
If AI keeps getting better (and it will) it's just a matter of time before there's more sophisticated cheats even for consoles, and they wouldn't even need to be running on it, I have little doubt about that.
Don't Gamepass online games have anti-cheat systems?
If not, that's pretty dumb. Microsoft need to fix that asap.
They won't ever fix this problem, unless they (developers, publishers, Sony and MS) go after the cheat providers directly. You no longer need to hack consoles to use hacks. During the ps360 days, they were going after cheat devices, but it was a cat and mouse game. These cheating methods were around during those days, it's nothing new, but they kept it under control. Since the PS4/Xbox one generation, they stopped going after these cheating devices and it became widespread. Which I find odd, since they started charging for online play (PS4).
Possibly, this is because the companies were going after cheats because the same cheats were being used to pirate the games, whereas today, the companies use online verification to prevent piracy, thus eliminating the need to go after people who cheat only to gain an advantage in the game. As long as the cheater remains below the radar, and does not completely break the game, the companies look the other way as their wallets are not threatened by it. (that is my completely Uneducated opinion on the matter)
I mean, COD games was always filled with hackers, nothing new. I can’t blame MS on this. Activision had years to try and fix this. Might take MS some time to make some change.
It all depends…
Microsoft’s guidance on how to handle gamepass on pc and their love to force crossplay with pc seems like a them issue.
And they own activision, so it is still a them issue.
The Yokai's Wrath bundle was released despite previous guarantees by Activision that A.I. would not be used for final assets, per the report. Instead, Activision assured developers it was simply for internal concepts. That, of course, was not followed through. For what it's worth, per the PlayStation Store, 2,400 COD Points cost $19.99, meaning players potentially spent real-life money on a skin that was not created by an actual human.
As far as A.I. use goes across Activision, a source told Wired that 2D artists are utilizing A.I. to aid their work. That is a result of mass layoffs, in which many 2D artists were impacted. “A lot of 2D artists were laid off,” the source named Noah said. “Remaining concept artists were then forced to use A.I. to aid in their work.” Mandatory A.I. trainings have been implemented, according to Noah.
It is not ubisoft has a ai tool for crating stories/script's they even talked about npc's having there own ai speech like we see with those skyrim mods.
Ai is the future sadly which sucks in so many way's.
Activision. And MS. They will ruin console gaming forever.
Oh and where the FRIGGIN outrage people? When Sony makes a remaster of a masterpiece single player story driven game, they get roasted. But this, this, goes unnoticed? Then don’t complain that you aren’t getting enough single player story games.
Replies(1)Ea and ubisoft also use ai
ea using ai for development threatening mass layoffs.
https://www.pcmag.com/news/...
ubisoft ai for npc speech
https://www.theverge.com/20...
Almost every big boy in the industry is using ai in some sort of way now
Oh and sony? well they are making spyware ai were they can see how long it took you to do X and adjust difficultly.
https://gamerant.com/sony-a...
Then you got AI agents
https://www.ign.com/article...
https://www.creativebloq.co...
@blackblades
Wow this site every time you say the S word or P word they dive in defend there god its beyond nuts
I said "they are making"
You know a term that means its not out yet ffs
How is that a response to what I said? Are they also selling AI generated skins?
Always bringing useless links totally off topic.. just to try to show you are superior in knowledge to everyone else
…simply laughable
@S2Killinit
You never mentioned skins in your comment just stated its all microsoft's fault like so many others.
When like i showed they are late to the ball game as every other company is using or plans to use ai in various field.
If you combine everything then its getting closer to hitting a button and poof out comes a game no soul no passion nothing.
Right now its art/3d models/skins/writing/voice work some and coding can all be done via ai.
That was the whole point of my comment, I wrote it in response to the article. Instead of focusing on making exciting games and developing talented developers, they are busy making AI generated skins that people are buying for huge sums of money. Then, some people turn around and shit on Sony when it tries to capitalize on single player classics by making remasters, and the same people then complain that they want more single player games. MS cannabalized the industry because they never thought making games was essential to their business. So, instead of nurturing theor own studios, they let them die, then went and shrunk the industry, hurting interests of every gamer in the world. Anytime there is a bad trend in the industry, MS is at the helm, leading the way. That is what I’m saying.
I'm sorry but do you honestly believe Sony will sit out of A.I. Every executive at every one of these publishers is wetting themselves in delight at the prospect of A.I. You best believe that once we start seeing it spread throughout the industry Sony won't be too far behind. The only people we'll have to blame are the consumers themselves.
No, I don't believe that Sony will not do the same. But, as I mentioned, MS is always the first to embrace such things and create the worst trends. Once they establish that this is the best way to make money, everyone else will follow. (Have to follow if they want to stay competitive)
S2, and blackblades:
All from the Horse's mouth below.
"Artificial intelligence (AI) in video games is crucial for Gen Z and Gen Alpha, who seek “personalization across everything,” says PlayStation executive Asad Qizilbash."
“Advancements in AI will create more personalized experiences and meaningful stories for consumers.”
"He emphasized that AI could enable non-player characters to interact with players based on their actions, enhancing the personal connection within the game."
Yeah, Just MS and Activision...smh
I’ve already explained myself twice. Quit your false equivalence, same thing the xbox fateful pulled before and after the ABK acquisitions. Which by the way, blew up in your faces real good. Now, doing the same thing when someone brings up MS’s nefarious behavior, defend them to the end, and watch them scorch gaming as they have been. At least rest of us can take consolation in that the smoke will go in your eyes before anyone else’s.
"Quit your false equivalence, same thing the xbox fateful pulled before and after the ABK acquisitions. Which by the way, blew up in your faces real good."
I'm not sure what you are talking about, you seem to have a issue communicating, because we are on a post about using AI to create video games content, and you put that solely at the feet of MS and Activision, when it's being, and will be used industry wide, right from Sony mouth, I would say it's relevant...then you went on to give Sony a spit shine slob down about a masterpiece TLoU when this had absolutely nothing to do with Sony or TLoU, then you attempted to clean up your rambling spit shine with no real backing for a ridiculous comment.
Obviously you meant to post that nonsensical over exaggerated comment. I also don't know what blew up in people faces, I am perfectly fine with the game industry, I don't have time to be internet outraged about nothingness.
Really read your comment and listen to what you said.
"Activision. And MS. They will ruin console gaming forever."
Bro, for real? Really? Seriously? It's that serious? So there is nothing Sony and Nintendo can do against MS and Activision? MS is 3rd place with you even talking about?
If we stay relevant on MTX, then you still sound ridiculous because again, you lay it all at MS and Activision's feet when almost all companies have used some form of MTX, including yup... Sony.
I read this comment, it boiled down to “seeiously?”.
My answer: yes seriously. Since you didn’t say anything else, what else can I tell you? Yes MS is seriously ruining gaming. They have been for some time, and working their way to where we are today, and aren’t even done yet. MS are the worst thing to happen to console gaming.
"The Yokai's Wrath bundle was released despite previous guarantees by Activision that A.I. would not be used for final assets, per the report."
We're talking concept art? Because as of right now there's no way to generate a final 3D model with final textures. So the final assets don't use AI. That's not to say that it sucks for 2D artist that it's easier to generate visual ideas and build from them leading to less 2D artists needed (really sucks), but are they say the final concept art was completely AI generated and then 3D artists built from that? And yes, I'll pile on that Activision as a publisher and their developers I have experience with suck and they'll do whatever, ethics be damned.
Wow I can just imagine the likes of Activision, EA and Ubi etc having an army of AIs creating overpriced crap and the fanboys just lapping it up. I hope the AIs have a good union.
I understand why people think it’s good idea to Unionize to fight back against such things but it’s not. It’s a bad idea. It’s activisions wet dream to have these pumped out weekly by some AI. Protect your neck!
60 FPS alone is Not enough to win BF3.
The only way to see which is best is for them to both come out and hear what not only the reviewers have to say but the gamers also.
I am interested in both personally for a few reasons, MW3 because not only am I familiar with the franchise and interface etc also that it carries on the story from the MW2.
BF3 am interested due to its use of the Frostbite 2.0 engine and unscripted damage.
However what puts me off BF3 slightly is the fact that it uses EA servers which are very unreliable and annoying as I have played many EA games on their servers and on many occassions cannot connect etc.
If for MW3 they were to remove auto aim altogether I think that would be a big plus 1 in my book and might be more inclined to purchased MW3 over BF3 but time will tell.
Its safe to say that both games are equally the same. However out of the two, each of them have their pros and cons.
Gamers who will get both games or gamers who will eventually be able to play both games will have their own judgement, instead of agreeing with reviewers.
Mw3 doesn't have anything to prove really. They are the defending champs. They have absolutely nothing to prove at this point. The fact that they are bringing back the COD4 style, mentality, map structures, run and gun aspect and the quick scoping will probably get them another 5 million in sales. I could seriously see MW3 getting 25 million in sales.
I think 60 FPS is huge for a competitive online game, MW3 has it and a slew of other features. I can almost guarantee that a lot of people who buy BF3 will also buy MW3, while the same wont be said to those who specifically buy MW3. BF games are always slow paced and filled with vehicle newbs. Now that BF3 is bringing back prone, you'll have a ton of snipers just laying on the ground and hard scoping in across the big ass maps.
For me spending $60 on a game like COD is always well worth it because I like most other COD players put days and even weeks into the game. The online community last's amazingly long, when you consider MW2 and B.O. both have over a million unique players on them each day on XBL you can get the feel for how long these games last.
.
While the " I'm to old to run and gun " Battlefield delusional senile crew say that 60fps doesn't matter in a fast moving game like COD...the massive COD fanbase says differently.
Of course the COD designed team is not jumping through hoops and lying to everyone on a daily basis...their the the WINNERS, THE BIG DOG, THE Peoples CHAMPION!!!...why would they sink to the bottom of the barrel like EA-Dice who want to be them...O_o
EA-dice, facing their ultimate doom and preparing for the worse, have toned downed their rhetoric as their lies are being exposed. Battlefield 3 will be no better or worse than Battlefield 2. Frostbite 2 is not much better than Frostbite 1 and it was all a lie a just trying to hype their game.
COD Elite will embarrass Battle log because Activision has gone 100% in that direction creating a company that does nothing but work on COD Elite...EA-Dice doesn't have a chance, the way it should be.
They could of launched at anytime but chose November, then realized they had no chance and changed it to October...it won't help. Wait till the multi-player and game play trailers begin their assault on " we have deathmatch too " Battlefield start...oh, the humanity.