All Channels
Popular
220°

How Sony is helping LightBox Interactive with the development of Starhawk

Harvard Bonin comments on the many ways Sony and the SCE Santa Monica Studio team are helping LightBox Interactive with the development of Starhawk.

Read Full Story >>
examiner.com
Dart895432d ago

Can't wait for this game.

negroguy5432d ago

I'd take this over any game right now. The multiplayer looks like a blast. (Maybe except BF3)

MysticStrummer5432d ago

I'd definitely take this over BF3 right now. Despite the visual quality and elevated level of destruction, BF3 is still just another military FPS. It's the best of that genre, but it's still part of an oversaturated genre. This looks fresh, though I wish it was still Chernovans vs Eucadians.

MidnytRain5432d ago (Edited 5432d ago )

BF3 will not be just another military shooter. Fully-featured war games are not common place.

Freshness is what you haven't played. If one has never played an FPS, then Call of Duty will be fresh to him. But if he has played many racing games, then he will say, "This new racing game is not fresh at all."

nolifeking5432d ago

Considering the new universe presented, Chernovans vs Eucadians would not have worked. Plus trying to avoid the military theme would be in vain using two warring military factions.

@Midny
BF3 is a run of the mill military shooter through and through. I am excited about it to be sure, but pretending the visuals and destruction make it anything more is preposterous. The weapons and scenery will be nothing out of the ordinary.

MidnytRain5432d ago (Edited 5432d ago )

Calling something the best of its kind, then calling it run-of-the-mill is contradictory.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...

Let us remember that Battlefield is a military game, so guns will be like real guns, and environments like real environments. So we must look to other areas when we say, "This game is special."

nolifeking5432d ago

@Midny
combing two different quotes from two different people to use a word you just got accustomed to is never a good idea. ;)

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5432d ago
n4gisatroll5432d ago

Am I the only one who wants less shooters and more diverse games? This looks like a huge upgrade to warhawk, but maybe it's because I got the game in 2008, I'm not uber hyped on yet, another shooter.

MidnytRain5432d ago (Edited 5432d ago )

Then be vigilant. If a game you do not recognize appears, then get to know it. You won't be disappointed. Your mind will become a respectable database of non-shooter video games yet released.

Pintheshadows5432d ago

Dishonored whilst first person, looks interesting. Also Skyrim, Deus Ex HR (you can shoot but don't have to), Batman Arkham City.

I know how you feel dude but there are options.

Knushwood Butt5432d ago

So buy 'more diverse games' then, and more people will make them.

thebudgetgamer5432d ago

i hope to crush my enemies with a transforming mech.

death from above!

80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
34d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted34d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8534d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele33d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla33d ago (Edited 33d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk33d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay33d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 33d ago
Athlon10134d ago (Edited 34d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit33d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg33d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10133d ago (Edited 33d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14933d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
47d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_47d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle46d ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker47d ago (Edited 47d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit46d ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog47d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_47d ago (Edited 47d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog47d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad47d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_47d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage47d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda46d ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

47d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
50°

Kratos actor T.C. Carson says Sony Santa Monica "realized that they let me go prematurely"

Kratos' original voice actor has explained how Sony approached him about returning to the role for the upcoming God of War Greek remake trilogy.

Read Full Story >>
gamesradar.com
darthv7257d ago (Edited 57d ago )

He was at my local game expo just this past December. During Q/A I asked him if he was interested in portraying Kratos again (this was before the reveal of the current projects). He said he would be, but its up to Sony. And they had chosen Judge because he had the stature AND voice to do the job.

So.... he probably already had been contacted to do this, but obviously could not say anything under NDA.

DarXyde57d ago

I liked T.C. Carson as Kratos a lot (and also a big fan of Living Single back in the day). But Chris Judge was also great. Carson was pure anger and very fitting for that era, as was Judge for the modern one. I'll never complain about either.I'll need to hear Carson now really go through the lines though and see how he does with classic Kratos.

It's a bit of a similar case for Metal Gear Solid. While I'm forever a Hayter fan and I didn't like Sutherland in the few moments he did speak, Sutherland as Big Boss/Venom Snake did have an "okay" transition voice between Hayter in MGS3 and Peace Walker, and Richard Doyle in MGS4. Both grossly outshined Sutherland, but I guess it has a slight hint of Hayter's gravel and some of the stern, tired and curt inflection of Doyle.