150°

Will Microsoft Dominate E3 2012?

There’s been a lot of rumors lately about Microsoft in the news, and all of it points towards E3 2012. Strangely enough, all of the pieces fit together, and it could be the company’s attempt at a coup de grâce on Sony and Nintendo, as well as revitalizing PC gaming.

Read Full Story >>
gamestooge.com
xX-StolenSoul-Xx5395d ago

They could have saved Halo 4 for 2012 E3, now unless they show off a console i doubt they'll win now.
But it's to early to tell maybe we'll see some epic games in 2012 only time can tell.

Now.. I just hope sony doesn't make so many exclusives in 2012, im going to be broke cause ima buy em all.

firemassacre5395d ago

No Way in bloody hell did they dominate.

Microsofts e3 was terrible with NO GAMES

I would give it to Sony because of the Vita's price point.

Dust 514

Sly 4

And exclusive ps3 content for...

.Saints Row The Third
.Battlefield 3
.Need For Speed The Run
.SSX
.Bioshock Infinit Vita.

LORD-PHOENIX5395d ago

they have the least 1st party studios so exclusives are not their strongest asset at the moment

but a new console unveiling will no doubt have the american press going wild....

xX-StolenSoul-Xx5395d ago

Bro you do know this is for 2012 not this years e3 lol

Godmars2905395d ago

As far as I can tell they've never had any real 1st party strength. Bungie was pretty much it with Halo, but that had been in the works for years before. Know many will argue but Lionhead's only become a joke because Molyneux either can't keep his mouth shut, deliver on the statements that com out of it or both.

And then there's what happened to Rare.

I really think it has something with big American business getting involved with gaming. Companies Like MS and Activision either forget or unaware that to be fun and/or enjoyable, some fun or honest creativity has to be involved in making them.

But they don't want games, they want product. Something you can pass off to the PR people who then try to sell the idea that what's being offered is "fun." And the trend is only growing with the cost of making games.

But yeah, it would be surprising if MS made a solid presentation this E3 considering what they've done recently.

lazertroy5395d ago

Also star trek,3d tv budle,Medieval Moves Deadman's Quest.

Biggest5395d ago

Wow. This already, guys? I'm getting used to the whole "Wait until E3!" thing, but isn't it a little too early right now?

zootang5391d ago

People talked about delaystation. Has the Xbox become the neXbox. Always next year we will announce games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5391d ago
gunnerforlife5395d ago

wow so my guy is thinking nearly a year ahead :S
what makes him think that sony wont Announce a new Ps3 next year for 2013, and 50 EXCLUSIVE Games at launch for it ¬_¬ see i can think a year ahead as well...

NoobJobz5395d ago

There is absolutely no way of telling who will have the best E3 a year from now. We can guess all we want but who knows.Microsoft may dominate but they may also be the worst at the show.

firemassacre5395d ago (Edited 5395d ago )

xX-StolenSoul-Xx

hahaha oh sh!t im in trouble... smh

ON TOPIC: if microsift announces new exclusive ip's then i do not see why not, they may have a good 2012 if alan wake 2 gets announced or if they bring a new original ip.

frankymv5395d ago

I'm sure MS will have an amazing E3 but so will Sony. All I knoew is that it will be an amazing show as 2 console makers will be competing for system loyalty.

shikamaroooo5395d ago

Not being a fanboy but they have already announced halo and gears won't be out for a bit after 3 unless there a gears kinect and the next fable game is kinect so I highly dought it

BioDemon-5395d ago

Gears was a new IP this gen, what is stopping you from thinking they won't announce some new IPs?

Commodore5395d ago

The Alan Wake disaster.....

garos825395d ago

its been 6 years and only a handful of new IPs what makes you think BioDemon they will be rushing to show you new IPs.

BioDemon-5395d ago

Quite frankly Garos, It's because if they don't, they're fucked.

ZoidsRaven5395d ago

I sure know one thing, I won't see it live after what MicoSoft pulled this year.
7_7

Show all comments (30)
80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
2d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_2d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle1d 15h ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit1d 16h ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog2d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog2d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad2d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_2d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage2d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda1d 15h ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

2d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
100°

Xbox Game Pass ‘has become too expensive,’ says Microsoft’s new gaming chief in leaked memo

Microsoft’s new Xbox chief, Asha Sharma, has signaled that Xbox Game Pass pricing is about to change. In an internal memo to Xbox employees, obtained by The Verge, Sharma admits that “Game Pass has become too expensive for players” and that Microsoft needs “a better value equation.”

Read Full Story >>
theverge.com
GotGame8183d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Microsoft has been talking about adding commercials to get the cost down. Not in game, but before you start a session. I would just open my game then get all the stuff I need to done, before sitting down to play.

If they cut the price down enough to justify it, I'd do it. Most Sub services are giving the option now. If it's worth it!

blacktiger2d ago

no moron! commercial will be in every loading and in game for further opportunity.

shadowfax331d 14h ago

user calling other user moron and gets upvoted....wow how toxic N4G has become.

jwillj2k41d 17h ago (Edited 1d 17h ago )

Multiple tiers. You decide at what level you want the ads. Obtrusive gives you access to more games. This will allow ads to play during crucial moments of gameplay, almost guaranteeing you fail/die. However you gain access to more games. Unobtrusive only shows ads before/after you play, however you get a fraction of the games. /s

peppeaccardo1d 15h ago (Edited 1d 15h ago )

FUK ads ... dont u have enough? MS should just make games and sell them, for indie or AA games get them on GP so to give visibility to small studios. They got into a business model which is not sustainable as it is killing their first party studios. Their fault .. .

Jingsing1d 15h ago

You do realize that has been one of the big reasons for the mass exodus of people leaving subscription services. Getting ad's while paying for a service and having the price continually jack up and ad time.

thorstein1d 12h ago

Why would they cut the cost to you?

GotGame8181d 11h ago (Edited 1d 11h ago )

What you said is not what I saw. What I read said at THE START of a session! Why be a jerk? It isn't like, I was intentionally lying, like so many do! Also, commercials will be an OPTION! Just like Netflix, Hulu, Prime, etc, offer them. GP is also aiming for free Cloud gaming with an AD supported tier.

I mean, do you even use GP? If you do and don't want commercials, you can pay not to have them. I in my OG comment said I might go the commercial tier IF it's worth it. No I wouldn't have all my loading screens be an ad like you said.
Have a great day.

BlaqMagiq11d 10h ago

I will never understand why people want forced ads in their faces in their games or their console. It's never worth it not even with a lower price tier.

CornholioX1d 9h ago

Ads are the virus that needs to be removed!!

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 1d 9h ago
2d ago Replies(4)
Exthun2d ago

Microsoft owns a massive collection of iconic IPs, yet somehow they keep proving they have absolutely no idea how to run the video game business.

Reaper22_2d ago

Its not their job to run the game business. Everyone has a business model. You do what works for you. You react to changes in the market. Thats really all you can do.

Smellsforfree2d ago

No, actually reacting to the market is how Sony threw $400 million (reportedly) at Concord.

__y2jb1d 16h ago

“Its not their job to run the game business” - a new low in the blind defense of Xbox.

Alek831d 9h ago

Interesting, isn't it?

Halo, Forza, Gears of War, Fable, Minecraft, and now Bethesda games... These should allow them to print money!

hiawa231d ago

Especially selling them to the huge Playstation base. I say add Nintendo to the release schedule if it is truly about selling software. Get the games to the most gamers.

hiawa232d ago (Edited 2d ago )

But, Microsoft heads set the price in the first place. Don't scapegoat Phil and Sarah on that as I don't think made those calls, and a $650 Series X and $400 Series S is a nonstarter for most.

Extermin8or3_1d 18h ago

The cost of the consoles is outside of their control, they aren't going to sell at a loss when they aren't making money off games sales cos xbox players hardly buy any games thanks to games pass, which costs far too much to run and make the first party titles for. The console prices are determined by various global factors effecting hardware atm.

Eonjay1d 9h ago

This is actually correct and what made things harder for Phil and Sarah was Amy hood demanding a 20% return on top of that

hiawa231d ago (Edited 1d ago )

I get all of the outside forces here on console pricing. They aren't selling at all which was also one of the reasons they went multi-plat, so there seems to be no answer here for them as are you saying a 5 year old Xbox costs you more to make in 2026 than in 2020? If that is the case there is nothing further to say. I have two Series Xs so I hope they last.

Extermin8or3_11h ago

@hiawa23 yes that is exactly what I'm saying same for ps5. Remember these devices would have been finalised 208/2019. They were designed during a period of particularly low hardware and rare earth materials etc. They aren't designed to be efficient and are large and have large heat footprints. Both new consoles will benefit from new manufacturing process reducing amounts of silicon although the leaks about next gen xbox strongly suggest it has a much larger chip set than ps6, in line with average pc chips etc size and cooling. All of this now costs alot more than it has previously. Meanwhile leaked documentation about ps6 explicitly states that Sony following recent global shocks like covid and Ukraine war wanted to future proof ps6 from cost perspective. This means lower emergy usage, smaller chips etc and likely form factor and thus weight. This will also lead to cheaper shipping costs. I fully expect base ps6 to come in at cheaper then ps5 pro. Which is likely to be discontinued.

Eonjay1d 23h ago

Well it seems like the rumor of COD leaving GP is real.

Jingsing1d 15h ago

They'll probably just end up killing off the surviving Xbox users who are left and that are into that model. They won't regain the vast majority they lost either.

Show all comments (48)
80°

Content Creators Are Receiving Xbox Project Helix Merchandise From Microsoft

Content creators are receiving Xbox Project Helix merchandise alongside a note from Microsoft Gaming CEO Asha Sharma.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
shadowT6d ago

Everyone deserves to make a bit of money

VenomUK4d ago

“Just wait until next year!”

DivineHand1254d ago

Well they are doing what they can to revive the brand. They have a lot of work to do.

1Victor4d ago ShowReplies(2)
peppeaccardo4d ago

yep agree 100% ... and some more. The hype machine is warming up and the performance numbers sheet will be filled in no time to guarantee that the winner on paper is revealed way before the launch day ... BUT as we all know only 1st party games and brand idenity will declare the real winner. Only problem is the price tag needed to get into next gen ...

SIdepocket4d ago

Just what the world needs: another poorly-selling console.

Agent754d ago

Next gen will be a massive failure for Microsoft and Sony, you could say it's already started. Game sales at an all-time low and the high cost of consoles and controllers, the PlayStation 5 Pro is the first indication on the pricing of next gen consoles and that's been a sales flop for Sony. Some people will say that people are paying eye watering prices for PCs, but that's an entirely different market, what I call OCD gaming. As I mentioned in another post, the PlayStation 5 Pro here sells for just under £800, which is just over $1000, games can top £75 ($100), including Switch 2 games. Some of us would like to see a single format, but that'll never happen. Microsoft and Sony would laugh at the idea of stepping off the gas pedal with the tech and do what Nintendo has done with the Switch 2. Three hybrid consoles fighting against each other, basically taking current tech and adding a few bells and whistles. Who's up for a PlayStation 6 for $999 and $99 games? Let me know in the comments.

Reaper22_4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

The simple solution is dont buy what you cant afford. You dont have to move on just because the companies do. If people want better hardware and better games theyre gonna be more expensive. People need to be content with what they have.

rlow13d ago

You know a lot of those sales are dads and moms buying for their kids and teens. Consoles have alway been a reasonable price to a degree. But you start heading far north of $500, I don’t see as many parents buying for their kids or teens……will it still sell? Yes but will it sell a hundred million or more…..that’s the real question. Hopefully ram prices drop.

derek4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

@Agent75 There is no need to lie to make your point. The ps5pro is selling as a percentage about as well as the ps4pro. The recent pssr2 update has actually improved its value. Your attempt to group the ps5 a console (that is about to cross 100 million sold and is by far Sony's most profitable generation) with the abject failure that is xbox is laughably stupid. Truth is Sony shouldn't even consider launching another console until 2029 at the earliest.

StoneTitan4d ago

Everyone except you knows the pro is a profit machine that is why its expensive.
Ps6 will not be even close to it in price

rlow13d ago

What happens if ram prices remain high? Do you think Sony or MS would eat those costs? Depends on how much they would have to absorb.

InUrFoxHole4d ago

And the lord shone his light upon gamers!

Show all comments (31)