150°

Will Microsoft Dominate E3 2012?

There’s been a lot of rumors lately about Microsoft in the news, and all of it points towards E3 2012. Strangely enough, all of the pieces fit together, and it could be the company’s attempt at a coup de grâce on Sony and Nintendo, as well as revitalizing PC gaming.

Read Full Story >>
gamestooge.com
xX-StolenSoul-Xx5338d ago

They could have saved Halo 4 for 2012 E3, now unless they show off a console i doubt they'll win now.
But it's to early to tell maybe we'll see some epic games in 2012 only time can tell.

Now.. I just hope sony doesn't make so many exclusives in 2012, im going to be broke cause ima buy em all.

firemassacre5338d ago

No Way in bloody hell did they dominate.

Microsofts e3 was terrible with NO GAMES

I would give it to Sony because of the Vita's price point.

Dust 514

Sly 4

And exclusive ps3 content for...

.Saints Row The Third
.Battlefield 3
.Need For Speed The Run
.SSX
.Bioshock Infinit Vita.

LORD-PHOENIX5338d ago

they have the least 1st party studios so exclusives are not their strongest asset at the moment

but a new console unveiling will no doubt have the american press going wild....

xX-StolenSoul-Xx5338d ago

Bro you do know this is for 2012 not this years e3 lol

Godmars2905338d ago

As far as I can tell they've never had any real 1st party strength. Bungie was pretty much it with Halo, but that had been in the works for years before. Know many will argue but Lionhead's only become a joke because Molyneux either can't keep his mouth shut, deliver on the statements that com out of it or both.

And then there's what happened to Rare.

I really think it has something with big American business getting involved with gaming. Companies Like MS and Activision either forget or unaware that to be fun and/or enjoyable, some fun or honest creativity has to be involved in making them.

But they don't want games, they want product. Something you can pass off to the PR people who then try to sell the idea that what's being offered is "fun." And the trend is only growing with the cost of making games.

But yeah, it would be surprising if MS made a solid presentation this E3 considering what they've done recently.

lazertroy5338d ago

Also star trek,3d tv budle,Medieval Moves Deadman's Quest.

Biggest5337d ago

Wow. This already, guys? I'm getting used to the whole "Wait until E3!" thing, but isn't it a little too early right now?

zootang5333d ago

People talked about delaystation. Has the Xbox become the neXbox. Always next year we will announce games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5333d ago
gunnerforlife5337d ago

wow so my guy is thinking nearly a year ahead :S
what makes him think that sony wont Announce a new Ps3 next year for 2013, and 50 EXCLUSIVE Games at launch for it ¬_¬ see i can think a year ahead as well...

NoobJobz5338d ago

There is absolutely no way of telling who will have the best E3 a year from now. We can guess all we want but who knows.Microsoft may dominate but they may also be the worst at the show.

firemassacre5338d ago (Edited 5338d ago )

xX-StolenSoul-Xx

hahaha oh sh!t im in trouble... smh

ON TOPIC: if microsift announces new exclusive ip's then i do not see why not, they may have a good 2012 if alan wake 2 gets announced or if they bring a new original ip.

frankymv5338d ago

I'm sure MS will have an amazing E3 but so will Sony. All I knoew is that it will be an amazing show as 2 console makers will be competing for system loyalty.

shikamaroooo5338d ago

Not being a fanboy but they have already announced halo and gears won't be out for a bit after 3 unless there a gears kinect and the next fable game is kinect so I highly dought it

BioDemon-5338d ago

Gears was a new IP this gen, what is stopping you from thinking they won't announce some new IPs?

Commodore5338d ago

The Alan Wake disaster.....

garos825338d ago

its been 6 years and only a handful of new IPs what makes you think BioDemon they will be rushing to show you new IPs.

BioDemon-5338d ago

Quite frankly Garos, It's because if they don't, they're fucked.

ZoidsRaven5338d ago

I sure know one thing, I won't see it live after what MicoSoft pulled this year.
7_7

Show all comments (30)
40°

Microsoft has revoked the DMCA takedown that forced an indie Minecraft-like off Steam

Microsoft claimed the indie game uses "Minecraft content."

90°

PS5 Sales Pass 92.2 Million Units, Beating Nintendo Switch 2 in the Holiday Quarter

Sony announced its financial results for the third quarter of fiscal year 2025, alongside the traditional update on PS5 shipments.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
13d ago Replies(5)
italiangamer12d ago

Sony and Nintendo are both thriving and I'm happy, thank goodness for them or otherwise the whole gaming industry would be in shambles if they only had PC to rely on!

dveio12d ago

• Total G&NS revenue: 10.5 billion USD
• Operating profit: 900 million USD
• Hardware sales: 8M units shipped
• Software sales: 97M units
• PSN MAU: 132M

vs. Xbox:

• Total gaming revenue: 5.96 billion USD
• nothing else gets reported

__y2jb12d ago

Xbox operating costs are without a doubt eye wateringly high, way way way higher than Sony. GP is costing them an absolute fortune to operate.

Tapani12d ago

That is a very solid operating profit. It's not net, obviously, but still a very healthy amount of cash you make after cost of debt and taxes (+ other expenses), and can invest into R&D and future endeavours. And give back to your shareholders or buy back shares.

DivineHand12512d ago

It would be in Sony's beat interest to not rush next generation. Let 2029 or 2030 be the start of next generation. There is clearly plenty of demand for the PS5 and gamers are not asking for more at this time.

S2Killinit12d ago

Yup especially with the price of tech going up. They already have the PRO to hold them over.

__y2jb12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

Exactly this. Let Xbox wither on the vine for a couple more years and there will be nothing left.

fr0sty12d ago

I fully agree for 2 reasons:

1. Microsoft seems to be in a hurry to release the new Xbox, if they do at all... AMD speculates a 2027 release. This will hurt them in the long run, because:

2. Datacenters are buying up ALL the RAM, and some RAM manufacturers have stopped making RAM for consumer products entirely, while the other remaining ones are scared to ramp up their production capacity to make more RAM because they're worried this whole AI thing is a bubble that is about to pop, and they don't want to be caught holding the bag when it does pop. So, for now, it costs $300-400 for 32GB of DDR5. That's the MSRP for some entire consoles.

If Microsoft drops the new Xbox now, it's going to cost them a fortune. If Sony holds their cards a moment and lets PS5 cook for a while, as it's showing no signs whatsoever of slowing down in sales, then by the time PS6 is ready to drop, RAM prices should have stabilized, allowing Sony to devote much more of their budget towards making PS6's CPU and GPU more powerful, in addition to the tech itself maturing and the available CPU and GPU parts being much more powerful for the same price point than they would be if released today. So, we'd get a super powerful PS6 in say, 2029, that won't have to cost $700-800. They speculate, based on the current specs, that the new Xbox will cost north of $1,000, and that was before the RAM shortage came into the picture. It's definitely going to be even higher now that RAM costs so much.

MS will be shooting themselves in the foot (again) if they try to drop a new Xbox now, and Sony would be wise to capitalize on that mistake by holding their cards a while longer, raking in more of those PS5 profits, and then dropping a new console as soon as the hardware market stabilizes from this AI datacenter BS.

darthv7212d ago

7 years is a hurry...? Its the same amount of time between XBO and series. The same amount of time between PS3 to PS4 and PS4 to PS5. The 360 was 8 years between it and XBO.

If they do release first, and then Sony a year or two later... is it not possible for prices to come down in that time?

repsahj12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

I think Switch 2 beat PS5 during December 2025 that is why the gap decrease to 1m units. Because during black friday, I know PS5 sales is 2:1 against the Switch 2.

And I just want to add that the PlayStation 5 is currently 1.94 million units BEHIND the PlayStation 4 when you align launches. While Switch 2 is 10M ahead against the Switch 1 when you aligned covering it's first 7 months.

S2Killinit12d ago

I think you are forgetting to mention the chip shortages for PS5.

salis84412d ago (Edited 12d ago )

No one wants the Switch 2 to do badly.

PS5 being less than 2m behind PS4 is not a big deal; PS5 had to deal with COVID and ongoing supply and pricing struggles that clearly still exist today. Sales of software are incredibly strong, and the size of the community is bigger than its ever been.

PS5 is well on pace to exceed its early (2021) estimates of 110m by end of life even if that's 2027. PS5 will hit 100m before November and then sell another 6-8M in November + December.

PS5 is doing great, and so is Switch 2, it's good for everyone that they succeed, pitting the two against each other is more damaging than anything related to the sales of the two consoles individually.

repsahj12d ago

"No one wants the Switch 2 to do badly."

majority on this site tells otherwise.

Dexterio12d ago

@repsahj
Yup because they’ve been the anti consumer they are for so long and needs to be humbled 😆

CrashMania12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

I'd be lying if I said I didn't regret my purchase a bit. I mainly bought it for Mario Kart World, but I find it pales in comparison to 8. I'm annoyed that Nintendo charged money for a super barebones 'upgrade' to Jamboree, no new minigames? No new boards? Just some gimmicky low res camera mode. Oh and Midtroid Prime 4 let me down as well, yet to go back and finish it.

I don't want the Switch 2 to fail, it's contributing to a healthier console market with the death of xbox consoles. I'll get use out of mine long term, but some of Nintendo's decisions like the ones above just annoy me lol.

jznrpg12d ago

@respahj the only thing I want Nintendo to badly is the 80$ games so they lower the price.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 12d ago
Show all comments (37)
50°

Sony Patents AI-Generated Podcasts Using PlayStation Character Voices

A new patent registered by Sony suggests the company is exploring the idea of personalized podcasts on PS5, hosted by PlayStation characters.

Eonjay13d ago

Okay this is actually really cool too. What is being proposed here is that the AI will generate you a podcast that is focused on the games tht you play or have wihlisted. This means you always get topic relevant to your tastes. Just don't screw it up with a bunch of ads.

PapaBop12d ago

AI is very cool, it's just all the real cool stuff is being drowned out by companies exploiting it as a marketing buzzword, generative AI slop and companies using it to cut corners and save money.

Sciurus_vulgaris13d ago

This is a terrible idea. Firstly the characters voices originate from real voice work. Secondly, the ai could end up saying questionable things. Thirdly, some voice actors use their regular voice when acting.

Juancho5113d ago

I know it's cool to hate AI, but we only hate AI because of idiots that misuse it or exploit it to take away peoples jobs. THIS is a GREAT application of AI, instead of having a human being voice actor sitting there for hours talking in character while having people writing scripts or coming up with topics etc, it can all just get POOFd into thin air and you can enjoy unique and entertaining content that harms no one.

PapaBop12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

Not sure if intentionally being funny lol. isn't this like quite literally taking away people's jobs? I think SAG-AFTRA may disagree about this harming no one.,

Juancho519d ago

The thing is that this isn't even something that's necessary to create as a job. Without AI it just wouldn't exist period, it wouldn't be worth the effort. So what I mean to say is, having AI utilize the voice actors (with their consent of course) to create unlimited "podcast-style" content is not only super lucrative (which people will call exploitation), but it creates an entire form of entertainment that requires a "Set it and forget it" mechanism where you don't have to babysit it or hire and fire or train or anything.

TLDR: Without AI this wouldn't even be considered at all, so I'd rather have this than not have it at all.

gold_drake12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

i hate this

i hate all of this. dont just use peoples voices for AI slob that u dont pay for

Show all comments (11)