
Did Microsoft's Xbox Live promotion do more than just offer gamers a cheap subscription for a month or two, or three...

Online multiplayer is back for 11 more games thanks to Insignia's XBL 1.0 replacement service running on Original Xbox consoles and the Xemu emulator on PC. Multiplayer, voice chat, leaderboards, etc. have been a monthly addition for many games from Xbox's past library thank to the team at Insignia.live! The 11 new games are now playable online once again after 13+ years.
Booo!! I was hoping that was Rainbow Six: Black Arrow...Boo!! again. I thought this coming to Xbox. I don't even read it I was so excited.

Has everyone completely forgotten Blinx?
Microsoft never could maintain a longrunning decent 3D platformers series of their own
Not sure if it was Xbox only back in the day but I'd love a current gen jet set radio!

Without a doubt, one of our highlights from EGX Rezzed 2016 was Table Top Racing. It was almost a classic love tale…”As soon as we locked eyes… (enter mushy crap here…)” – We think you get the picture. It just reminded us of a time where gaming was much less complicated and way more colourful, however at the time the game was only due to be released on the PS4… That’s not a bad thing. It just mean’t that being my primary console of choice is Xbox One, we wouldn’t get to play this any time soon as the majority of my games and friends reside in the Microsoft ecosystem – so when we got word this was getting a release on Xbox One, we immediately put our hands up and said “Yes, Please!”.
Yes, it is a clever strategy to get subscribers... MS does not value their customers...
"what Microsoft has effectively done is assured your partnership with them for the foreseeable future"
Oh give me a break. I bought more because I wanted to play more, not because I was lured into a trap or whatever.
"Their allegiance to Microsoft is well assured now"
ALL HAIL MICROSOFT!
...er, not really, I use my PS3 just as much thanks.
Well, anytime that you can lock in a cheaper price for something that you know you will use long term, why not? I think it is a win-win for both sides
"Microsoft is surely the clear winner in all this right or should that be PS3 owners who aren't having to pay a penny for their online service?"
Why does he compare these two groups? They really have nothing to do with each other in the article at all, other than in the introduction, to essentially get the story rolling.
I'll admit it's an interesting theory, but again the comparison between a company's potential marketing scheme and people that don't pay for a similar service being marketed, doesn't make very much sense, and just comes off as a really weak jab or something. It's like comparing Verizon (the company) with the customers that spend less money at Sprint.