Extract from the post: "F.E.A.R. 3 wasn’t in my wishlist. But I had to play it and try it to give you an my point of view. After Duke Nukem Forever, anything would be playable. I really didn’t know what to expect from this title but I wasn’t excited: first because it’s the 3thd expisode of a series and I’m not fan of the very series that has never really excited me and then because what I’ve seen from the game wasn’t that nice and fun. But Let’s deal with FEAR 3 and let’s try to make the point about Alma!"
DualShockers Writes "F.E.A.R. 3 (or F.3.A.R. if you’re a marketing executive) isn’t a great singleplayer game. It’s fine, competent even, but Day One Studios had an unenviable task in trying to wrap up Monolith’s F.E.A.R. series. With two timelines and two highly different styles of horror attempted in its wake, F.E.A.R. 3, well, it tries its best."
F.E.A.R. 3 wasn't even really a horror game when it came to the campaign. It was a good action game, but lost just about all of its horror roots along the way.
There have plenty of great horror games, but others haven't been so lucky as to stick around. They deserve to get a new lease on life.
That was probably the first time ever that I saw Castlevania in a list of horror games.
ps: Be warned, you have to click a lot to see every game in the list. I stopped after the 4th time.
What is divergent co-op and how could more games benefit from it?
a review from someone who doesn't even like the series what a bloody joke!! I love the series so i reckon a PROPER review would be around 8.5/10 i reckon. I am getting this game.
write an OBJECTIVE review, send it to me and I'll publish it. I'm not fan of the series but I can review a game honestly and have an objective point of view on a game. Many reviews of other webzines agree with my note.
Many sequel have impressed me. It's not a matter of a series. The thing is I prefer a reviewer who knows the series than a reviewer who doesn't know anything about the series.