All Channels
Popular
250°

Sony Wins E3 Easily

So there were definitely a few questions left after E3. Should Microsoft have announced the new Xbox? After that presentation, I would say yes. Did Nintendo attract an audience with the Wii U? Hard to say with the lack of specs given. Did Sony do enough to justify winning this? They're offering new things that the competitors didn't. Sony is also getting a lot of support on exclusive content.

Continue reading on Examiner.com Sony Wins E3 Easily - Greenville Video Games | Examiner.com http://www.examiner.com/vid...

Read Full Story >>
examiner.com
Pedantic915452d ago (Edited 5452d ago )

Are we still debating this ?

Look, there was only one clear winner at E3 and that obviously was gamers.

Godmars2905452d ago

Unless you were expecting more mainline support from MS, or a clear idea of Nintendo's next console. Just saying.

Sony did well, but there were no major, over the top, surprises.

afterMoth5452d ago

All three were lackluster but Sony had the best showing of actual games and the killer price point for Vita.

MS is dead last unless you are in the 3-6 year old range, then MS was first.

Queefy_B5452d ago

Well Sony announced new games and a kick as$ handheld at a very good price so Sony had me most excited at E3 so for me Sony had the best conference by default really.

MysticStrummer5452d ago

Most people who are interested in the gaming industry, both consumers and journalists, disagree with the assertion that there wasn't a clear winner.

StbI9905452d ago (Edited 5452d ago )

Dude VITA WON, what gamers nor gamers...fck that, Viva la VITA...vita had me applauding lololol

Maxned5452d ago (Edited 5452d ago )

Sony didnt announce anything new. While the Vita is absolutely amazing, their actual E3 press conference was 2nd to Nintendo, who announced tons of new games and a promising new console.

Here comes the disagrees despite a completely valid statement.

KonaBro5452d ago

if it took into account that the only thing Nintendo did right was announce games for the 3DS. Once the Wii U presentation started, things went downhill quickly. Instead of an announcement that would have blown E3 apart, we got a messy reveal that gave us little to no details and confused a majority of the people following it. Sony wins.

Maxned5451d ago

@KonaBro

How was the WiiU bad?

It is 50% more powerful than the 360 and Ps3, and tons of 3rd party developers confirmed their support for it. Not only that, but Nintendo confirmed SSB for WiiU and showcased some really cool uses of the new controller.

On TOP of that, Nintendo showed/announced Starfox 3DS, Luigi's Mansion 2, Kid Icarus, and the awesome-looking Super Mario.

It's pretty simple, really. Sony showed nothing new, they just showed off already announced software and hardware.

ATiElite5451d ago

Look, there was only one clear winner at E3 and that obviously was gamers.

What r you talking about? I didn't win one Got Dam thing and I must of entered at least 50 drawings. lol

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5451d ago
jacksonmichael5452d ago

Is your reply to his comment a joke? (to save some time, my comment is).

liore5452d ago

In terms of the content of games sony won hands down

Ninver5452d ago

i wonder if there will be a trade in deal for psp slim.

Show all comments (30)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
24d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted23d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8523d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele23d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla23d ago (Edited 23d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk22d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay22d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 22d ago
Athlon10123d ago (Edited 23d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit22d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg22d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10122d ago (Edited 22d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14923d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
36d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_36d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle36d ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit36d ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog36d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog36d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad36d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_36d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage36d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda36d ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

36d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
40°

Sony Shows Off 20 Minutes of Crimson Desert on a Base PS5

Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
BlazedKong62d ago

looks god awful on the base systems