All Channels
Popular
480°

No Gears For PS3..Does It Really Need It Though?

Its been confirmed that the Gears of War Franchise will not be making it to PS3. The question is does it need it? Check out our opinion on the situation.

joeyisback5438d ago

na us ps3 owners dont need gears we got enough games already the 360 can keep it

EYEamNUMBER15438d ago

don't kid yourself you can never have too many games

BakedGoods5438d ago

I doubt I'll even have enough time for all the PS3 exclusives + multiplats.

captain-obvious5438d ago (Edited 5438d ago )

i think the next EPIC IP is going to be a Mltiplat game

but gears is going to still be a 360 title

Why o why5438d ago

Definitely. The more te merrier. The ps3 doesnt need it but is vast library only gets better with it not worst so yeah

TheLastGuardian5438d ago

Gears of War is the only franchise that makes me want a 360. Sadly, 1 exclusive franchise isn't enough for me buy a 360. I wish Gears was on PS3.

manumit5438d ago

@ captain-obvious:

You mean like Bulletstorm?

SilentNegotiator5438d ago (Edited 5438d ago )

Of course it would be nice to have Gears on the PS3, but MS wouldn't let that happen. Not if they had a brain in the whole company.

I'd still rather play Uncharted; I like that the gameplay is more vertical. And don't go calling it a clone; Uncharted:DF was shown less than a year after Gears 1, cover system and all. Unless you think they completely retooled the game to be cover-based in less than a year, level design, AI, and all else...

@manumit
You just out-obvious'd captain Obvious! {:v0

DualConsoleOwner5438d ago

BulletStorm... remember that? yes that was made by Epic and another studio owned by Epic.

As for Gears, their contract expires with MS after the third one, so if the new gears are coming out, then it will be on PS3.

Unless MS do a new contract ofc, but i doubt that after seeing MS let go of Valve, Bioware, Bungie and etc.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5438d ago
jwatt5438d ago

Yeah Gears is beast and would be a cool game to have on the ps3 but the game is made for the 360 and Uncharted is made for the ps3.

dragon825438d ago

I agree with what you said but I never get the whole Gears of War/Uncharted thing. Other than being in third person and having guns, they aren't even remotely similar games. It cunfuses me every time I see someone say "We don't need Gears because we have Uncharted". ??

-Alpha5438d ago

Speak for yourself, the more games the better.

I've always been curious to play Gears' no respawn MP. Also, it'd be nice to have more split screen games for my PS3

NateCole5438d ago

Alpha.

Its people like you that really screw up gaming. Exclsuives should exist.

If more games the merrier then what happens when you have all the games on one platform?.

Stop being so cheap and fork out for multiple platforms if you want to play every game.

JD_Shadow5438d ago

That's not what he was saying. He was condemning this talk of "oh, they should keep it. I don't want it on my fav system." Why say that you wouldn't want more of a choice? He didn't say there shouldn't be exclusives.

baodeus5438d ago (Edited 5438d ago )

Although Ps3 doesn't need gears, but it doesn't hurt to have them either. It would be great actually to have, so ps3 only onwer can enjoy one of the best game this gen.

@alpha

agree. I do love the no respawn MP part of gears. It make you play more cautiously and more nerve racking than just run and gun, die, rinse and repeat. Although they did come up with that pool of lives share with the team, sound like an interesting idea for MP. Epic really know how to create fun game mode.

dragon825438d ago

You should try SOCOM if you like the "No Respawn" multiplayer games.

I also would like to see more split-screen co-op games in general. I hate this whole idea that if we want to play co-op, it has to be online. My wife and I love to play shooter in split-screen together. It sucks that most games don't include this anymore.

It's the reason we have two PS3's and have to buy two copies of alot of PS3 games. Not really an issue on 360 because of the dual login feature and the fact that most of the games I own for it have split-screen.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5438d ago
KRATOS-PS35438d ago

Gears of War is a great franchise, no doubt about that. But every system should keep its own big titles. We have Uncharted and Killzone instead and we are proud of that. I've played each Gears and each Uncharted and for me Gears is simply too cursorily compared to Uncharted. So I go with Uncharted and I don't really need Gears on PS3. But still it is an amazing playthrough.

TheFreak5438d ago

Raising the sony flag while singing the sony anthem

DarkFantasy5438d ago (Edited 5438d ago )

Uncharted yes but killzone = blahhhhh i would replace killzone with say Warhawk/Starhawk and Twisted Metal(the oldest ps franchise) oh any maybe some God of War..only thing going for killzone is graphics every thing else about kz is mediocre i don't get the hype but respect those who love it.but anyway uncharted is the best out of all these games soo yeeah. Uncharted 2 MP is alot more fun then kz3 mp but opinions are like assholes everyone's got one.soo hyped for uncharted 3!!! ...also no ps3 dosen't need gears,gears needs ps3 if it wants *ps3 game sales* outher then that it's fine on the 360 just as is but i wouldn't say no to the idea.

chasedagreat5438d ago (Edited 5438d ago )

keep it on the 360

Anderson85438d ago

i would welcome gears if it dropped on the ps3.. but i wouldnt care if it never came

metsgaming5438d ago

if i had to choose 1 game to turn to multiplat that the 360 has it would be gears but they have so few they should do what they can to keep it.

AlienLion5438d ago

You know an article is shit when it starts with a misquote. He actually said:"I would say in the foreseeable future there’s zero chances of Gears of War being on the PlayStation 3..."
Also, the ps3 doesnt NEED it, just like it doesnt NEED Starcraft II, but it sure would be nice. What kind of dumb point is he even making?

NewZealander5438d ago

i own both consoles, and i believe ps3 is just fine without gears, playing infamous 2 atm and looking forward to UC3, xbox needs the few exclusives it has, i have to admit im getting sick of the old fable, gears, halo, forza, kinect rinse and repeat strategy that MS has adopted for the 360.

Gazondaily5438d ago

Yet the titles you enjoy playing currently and looking forward to play are sequels.......right....

NewZealander5437d ago

septic yes i love sequels too, assassins creed franchise being my favorite, but i just wish for MS to blow me away with a totally new IP, i know sony is focusing on sequels a lot too, but they do tend to mix it up a bit better then MS.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 5437d ago
LOGICWINS5438d ago

With the way the PS3 is selling, it obviously doesn't "need" Gears, but I know a couple of people(including myself) who would have bought it.

5438d ago
Croash5438d ago

Exactly my thoughts.
Who knows, there might be a Gears of War trilogy on PS3 one day.

But it doesn't matter. I'll eventually get a 360 to play the series, it's not like it's as expensive as it was before.
I guess a Gears of War 3/360 250Gb bundle will be just what I need.

towelie12885438d ago

a new xbox 360 is coming out with gears of war 3 and a 320 gig hardrive with two badass controllers

Croash5438d ago (Edited 5438d ago )

Uhh...This?! http://www.joystiq.com/2011...

Holy shit O_o Now that is epic.
But it doesn't seem to be confirmed in Europe.

Anyway, I want to get a PlayStation Vita, but if the handheld gets a 2012 release (even early 2012), I'd rather get that Xbox bundle for Christmas.
I sure hope it will come to France D:

Thanks for the info!

Firstkn1ghT5438d ago (Edited 5438d ago )

It might not need it but it will definitely sell better than KZ and Resistance combined.

LOL! It's a dark sci fi war shooter dude. The games are practically the same except Gears takes it to another level which is why it would sell better than the games mentioned....dude.

Lord_Sloth5438d ago

Compare a 3rd person to other 3rd person titles, dude.

mrv3215438d ago

And sell less than Wii Sports, I suppose 360 needs Wii Sports now.

Wait... are we comparing sales now

JESUS CHRIST, OF ALL THINGS HOLY I'VE GOD DAMNED TIME TRAVELLED BACK TO 2000 AND 7.

Oh wait, it's just some 14 year old living in the past.

You got me so excited to, back to my large hamster collider experiment #34919.

TKCMuzzer5438d ago (Edited 5438d ago )

Your comment explains your one bubble.
So what your saying is that sales means the game is on another level, like the way COD takes FPS's to another level every year.

I own Killzone 2 and 3 and Gears 1 and 2 yet I have played the Killzone series more. Your logic is without logic.

Stewie2k85438d ago

where have i seen people going on about sales all the time before.. ah yes, and stop saying 'dude' you sound like an idiot, dude.

Why o why5438d ago

Dumb fanboy is dumb.....

Anyway like people are saying sales dont make a game. Anybody whos been gaming for long enough knows this as they would of definitely of played and enjoyed a game that wasnt as popular as x or y. Another thing some forget to mention is that when theres a drought water tastes like champagne. If there was more titles to choose from they'd probably all sell less. Do you think gears and halo would sell the same if they were stupidly released simultaniously with modern warfare. The only sale that really matters to me is my own. If the game is heavy on multiplayer then of course sales matter but it doesnt need 5 mil for there to be enough people to mame. I wish these kids would grow up

LocO_o5438d ago (Edited 5438d ago )

Question: Why has'nt any one tried to developed a game with the Gears style.

I am not saying to make a carbon copy of geras but to use the formula that makes Gears fun.

Edit: Qantum Theory tried but that does not mean that others cant pull it off.

paintsville5437d ago (Edited 5437d ago )

Well I don't think that Epic would release Gears on PS3 because they want it to have good frame rates, no torn frames, great SSOA, great shadows, good anti aliasing, high rez textures, NO MANDATORY install required, consistent online play, and have lots of enimies on the screen all at once. All this made possible with 360's Vastly Sup3ri0r GPU and unified RAM architecture. They'd be severly limited with PS3's ancient RAM architecture and it's 1nf3er1or, ancient, paultry, pitiful GPU wannabe RSX along with the snail's pace data throughput of the blu ray drive. Not a chance in hell they'll put their flag ship IP on that thing. Not to mention that they actually want to market it to people that actually buy games and don't primarily buy a device as a movie player.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5437d ago
DaThreats5438d ago

Its going to come instead to Vita
Watch

Surfaced5438d ago

Probably not, but undoubtedly something from Epic Games will arrive on Vita. Their VP, Mark Rein, is very taken with the handheld. http://beefjack.com/news/ep...

edhe5438d ago

ehh... rein is 'taken' by shiny objects.

But UE will come to vita, no doubt.

ZombieAssassin5438d ago

It doesn't need it but I'd sure as hell buy it, best 360 exclusive for sure.

Show all comments (114)
60°

Final Fantasy X 25th Anniversary Website Launches With New Nomura Artwork and Merchandise

Square Enix launches Final Fantasy X 25th anniversary site, revealing new Nomura art, books, music releases, and merchandise.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
-Foxtrot8d ago

Look I know VIII has its issues and all that but how on earth can the do big anniversary events with new artwork and merchandise for VII, IX and X yet VIII got sweet f*** all.

They could have given it something during its 25th anniversary yet all it got was a single Happy Anniversary post on their social media.

solideagle7d ago

they should know that we are OG fans of VIII as it sold truckload as well. not as much as VII or X. I personally didn't like IX but X and VI are my personal fav.

Shadow Hearts 2 covenant is another game I love. I hope one day someone can make remake, I would be delighted

Relientk777d ago

Final Fantasy VIII is great and you are always the first to defend it in the comments

70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay8d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn29d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers9d ago (Edited 9d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn28d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown9d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos9d ago (Edited 9d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay8d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay8d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac8d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger9d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster30009d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde9d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood9d ago (Edited 9d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde8d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)
40°

15 Years Ago, Mortal Kombat (2011) Saved Gaming’s Biggest Fighting Franchise

A brutal reset, a smarter story, and a return to what made it great—Mortal Kombat (2011) revived the series.

Read Full Story >>
fortressofsolitude.co.za
italiangamer16d ago

"Gaming’s Biggest Fighting Franchise"

Press X to (seriously) doubt.

DarXyde14d ago

Underrated comment. I used to hate that game so much that any time my siblings asked me to play it, I just picked Hom and shut myself down mid-match.

Soy15d ago

And then MK1 killed it again.

DivineHand12514d ago (Edited 14d ago )

15 years went by so fast. I remember playing through the story mode at launch.