All Channels
Popular
260°

Nintendo won E3 "hands down"

Forget all those publishers, who won the E3 press conference showdown - Microsoft, Nintendo or Sony?

"Nintendo won, hands down," EEDAR analyst Jesse Divnich told Eurogamer. "They had great content and a well-executed presentation. No celebrities, no famous rock bands, just straight gaming."

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
DarkCharizard_5441d ago (Edited 5441d ago )

While all 3 conferences were great and the competition was stiff, Nintendo eventually had the best conference.

I'm glad Mr. Divnich & Mr. Pachter agree :)

Peaceful_Jelly5441d ago

how it had the best conference? All Nintendo showed was a couple of tech demos and a video of the "expected features" of the tablet because they didn't even had the actual console nor games to present.

All you saw there was staged like MS conference.

Venoxn4g5441d ago

3DS games were great too

Lyle915441d ago

"All Nintendo showed was a couple of tech demos and a video of the "expected features" of the tablet"

Exactly, and that's all they needed to show to have the best conference. Plus they also showed some awesome 3DS games.

montyburns0005441d ago

the WiiU was on the show floor. inform yourself buddy

Skip_Bayless5441d ago (Edited 5441d ago )

So I guess everyone forgot about Sony's 2005 conference where they just showed tech demos of the PS3 and CG trailers. We fell for the Multiple HDMI ports, 1080p 60 frames native for the majority of the games, and the cell processor handling graphics. Well good luck with that, because it's to my advantage to not fall for the WiiU when the majority of the promised things won't come out for another 2 or 3 years.

^
Yea it was on the showfloor, but those were demos of technically inferior games. Do you really believe that 2D mario is a next AAA game?

AWBrawler5441d ago

That mario would go on to sell double digit millions if it were released, and you know it.

zerox5055441d ago

no matter what happens you will always have people sucking too much of nintendo's dick at e3...

fear885441d ago

I have to disagree with Nintendo being the winner.

They did not divulge much information on the system, its tech, the price, the games, the online, the maximum controller support, and up until the end of the conference did we realize that the controller was not the console. They left more questions than concrete answers at the very end.

I did like their presentation on the 3DS games because it feels like they are trying to justify the 3DS with solid software support but that should have been there at launch. Not 9 months later.

The 3DS demos also felt like they were stretching their time to cover that whole time slot instead of having content well planned out for the conference.

I also understand that they wanted to make a statement to their fans and to impress people with the "orchestra" concert but really, that felt more like a time filler than an actual tribute. They could have spent less time on the orchestra and focused on details with the Wii U.

Hell they could have just left the orchestra performance right until the end to really WOW the crowd with an extra treat at the end. I would have greatly appreciated that.

Microsoft had a similar conference except with a lack of an orchestra or a system enigma to announce.

Sony at least had everything well paced. I hated the guys demoing the Vita because, honestly, I did not care what crappy hack and slash they were working on (I remember Untold Legends and how much that sucked).

But at least they showed enough to really get people interested and informed. I would have liked to see more PS3 games that I am greatly anticipating (The Last Guardian and numerous rumored titles in production) instead of a crappy filler with Infamous 2 (despite it being a good game it was coming out the next goddamn day) as well as some innovative PS Vita game demos, (instead of the mediocre ones sans Uncharted).

I really would have loved for them to have demonstrated Virtua Tennis and Little Deviants because they were incredibly impressive on the show floor with the use of the motion sensing, rear touch panel, and AR in Little Deviants and the really intuitive touch controls in Virtua Tennis.

All in all this E3 was a huge Meh. And to be honest I feel as though nobody won, it was a tie between Nintendo and Sony, or that Sony won by a small margin.

Because this conference was lackluster compared to Sony and Nintendos E3 last year and well... microsoft just keeps on getting worse.

BulletToothtony5440d ago

even thou I liked the idea of wii U i know i won't be buying it since it will be mostly casual.

Instead I KNOW i will be buying Vita and most of the ps3 games announced.

Not cause I own a ps3 but because those are the games that appeal to me.

Just because Nintendo announce something relatively cool doesn't mean that the games appeal to me. Nor that it was the best for core gamers.

So to me Sony HANDS DOWN!!!

MaxXAttaxX5440d ago

except a tech-demo of their tablet controller for the Wii-U(which they didn't show).

That was the only big surprise at E3.
So if Nintendo won anything, it's the surprise award.

But Sony had much more content(+ PSVita)
http://youtu.be/8DUdGTZnQ3c...
So there.

OmegaSlayer5440d ago

I can say that Microsoft was a little underwhelming, but no one really won, and it has been a disappointing E3.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 5440d ago
5441d ago
IronFist5441d ago

Sony's was better imo, that pointless 25 mins in the beginning of Nintendo's conference completely ruined it. If you're going to show stuff, show it, don't do pointless things that just annoy gamers (also looking at you Ubisoft).

Mykky5441d ago

The begging gave me goose bumps! It was the celebration of the most popular and critic awerded hardcore franchise of all time! It was maybe pointless for you but for me as a real Zelda fan it was perfect! Just tell me why Sony's conference was better, when Nintendo announced and showed of tons of games, a new console and a live musical performance of one of the most beloved franchises. (I'm more of a Sony fanboy than a nintendo fanboy as the Wii has nearly no AAA games, just to clear things up since we are on a forum where the majority is Sony fanboys)

NESpower5441d ago (Edited 5441d ago )

I totally agree. The presentation for 3DS games was the best I have ever seen creatively. It gave the impression of real 3D without glasses. And the presentation started with an ode to the LEGENDARY 25 years of Zelda with a real live orchestra. That was classy, instead of some cheesy techno track..lol. Iwata has a charm and Reggie is cool so I like hearing them speak. I am literally buying 95% of what Nintendo showed including Wii U..lol.

Peaceful_Jelly5441d ago

Iwata and Miyamoto are nice but Reggie? During the entire conference I just wanted to punch that dude in the face so he stop talking like Obama. The guy sounds arrogant, boring and uninteresting... He doesn't make jokes like Tretton, he's not outgoing like Don Mattrick, he is just like a robot trying to sell ice to an eskimo.

Soplox5441d ago

Thats why we call him the Reggienator

Reggie FTW!

AWBrawler5441d ago

Your Body wasn't ready, that's all!

Reggienator is cool people. I met him once.

Ju5441d ago

With all that 3D fuss at the 3DS presentation Nintendo could not even show content in 3D to the audience.

I just don't get the Nintendo fangirls. Another Mario, another Luigi, w/e. Things we played 10 years ago, and yet it is celebrated like fresh sliced bread. The only thing that another Mario has is 3D - presented with sub pixels on a oversized projection screen in - ta ta - 2D.

A new console, where they actually forgot to tell the audience that was a new console - but focused on the controller yet. On top of that, no real footage has been shown running on that thing (for all we know that could have had a PC locked away in those kiosks). No specs, no real info. Everybody is hyped but nobody asks real questions.

I don't know. Nintendo can suck it for me. Same as last gen. I am not really so against what they do, for they just miss that by a little. Cool concepts and all, but they overdo it in a way that for me it ends up as a gimmick. All they do is nice, as an option. But not for mainstream. That said, I might get me a WiiU (stupid name) to fill some gaps, but it won't replace what I'm used to.

Lekumkee5441d ago

Hey don't forget they bringing back the tooniki suit, I don't think you know the significance of the tooniki suit.

Next game they're gonna bring back the hammer brothers suit and that will revolutionized Mario games forever... you understand me!?! FOREVER!!!

/s

Foxhound9225441d ago

You sir are a genius. I completely agree, nintendo gets a pass every year for showing these lame gimmicky awkward products that people play a couple times and stop using it. I know 11 people with a wii, 9 out of the 11 have it stashed in their basement and 2 out of the 11 use it only for netflix...some great innovation ha? the 3ds is horrible as well, and now they are coming out with a new system with a weird tablet controller that cant be seperated from the system. another gimmick, more shovelware, more awkwardness. Its sad becuase they will sell like hot cakes becuase all the old people and soccermoms will gobble it up for their kids like always and will be touted as the highest selling system of the new gen but nobody will like it. Nintendo is smart fore doing that, but it doesnt make them better than the other 2 giants. the same rehashed mario,zelda and dance games come out every year and the fangirls go crazy. its kind of funny

NESpower5441d ago

I can't believe you fools.....Reggie is cool...tretton is a douche for what he said about Nintendo..lol.

H2OAcidic5441d ago

The footage they used for some of the games was the Xbox 360 and PS3 in-game footage.

I can say the writer must be a huge Nintendo fan boy not to notice that and the entire time I was watching it I was like WTF Nintendo you did better last year. You sucked big time this year Nintendo and turned off the TV.

Show all comments (58)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio3d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing3d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster923d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit3d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing3d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster923d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
6d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted6d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy856d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele5d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla5d ago (Edited 5d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk5d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay5d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5d ago
Athlon1016d ago (Edited 6d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit5d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg5d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon1015d ago (Edited 5d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz1495d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay5d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn26d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers6d ago (Edited 6d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn25d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown5d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos5d ago (Edited 5d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay5d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay5d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac5d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger5d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster30005d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde5d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood5d ago (Edited 5d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde5d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)