All Channels
Popular
240°

Minecraft On 360: What’s Your Angle Microsoft?

While Minecraft has been a HUGE success on the PC, Microsoft flabbergasted many when they announced the game would be coming to the Xbox. Captainstarball analyzes what MSFT is hoping to achieve from bringing the indie hit to their console.

Read Full Story >>
captainstarball.com
rabidpancakeburglar5452d ago

I think their angle is to try and make a hell of a lot of money off of one of the most popular games in the world right now

Godmars2905452d ago

And to keep it off of the PS3 just for the sake of keeping it off and saying they have it. Should such come up as reason to someone looking for a game console.

saladthieves5452d ago

Something tells me that by signing an exclusivity deal, they are losing out on the PS3 platform. The PSN is a lot more open with their network policies than XBL. Let's just hope that Microsoft don't play their stupid game of limiting the amount of DLC from Minecraft. Getting Minecraft as an exclusive is a smart business decision on their end, as it saves lots of cash rather than say starting up a new studio. On the other hand, it appears as if they just stooped to a new low...going after the hit PC game Minecraft...really Microsoft?

Honestly, I don't know what they (Microsoft) are doing these days. They are no longer those guys who in 2007 were killing the PS3 with games, large exclusives and truly catered towards the hardcore market. It's now the other way round. The PS3 has tons of exclusives and Microsoft continues to rely on 3rd party games to satisfy its users with timed DLC.

Purchasing Skype, closing down 1st party studios and betting all their money and bank all on Kinect just for the sake of casuals is a very risky thing. Nintendo just showed that you can't rely on the casuals for long-term cash cows, and Microsoft are just trying to ride this sea of cash that Nintendo just finished fishing. Wait until the casuals get tired and decide to leave (they always do) and then it'll bite them in the ass.

captain-obvious5452d ago (Edited 5452d ago )

minecraft with no MODS and no servers and clients
its just not fun

keep in mind its not being ported by the main ppl but by some other small studio so dont expect a perfect port

the main guys are working on the PC and mobile version

besides any OLD ASS pc can run this game
so i cant see whats the problem here

gamingdroid5452d ago

I mean, it's as if PS3 doesn't have exclusives it want's to keep off the Xbox 360?

saladthieves5452d ago

@captain-obvious

Also the PC version allows you to play online for free as opposed to paying for Xbox Live.

HardCover5452d ago (Edited 5452d ago )

"Honestly, I don't know what they (Microsoft) are doing these days."

Microsoft simply don't know the gaming industry the way Sony does. Xbox 1 lost 4 billion dollars. That's a monumental loss.

With the 360 you can see that they play a lot of guessing games. One moment they have great first party, next moment they're buying out third party, next moment they're going for Nintendo's washed up market share. And whatever they do, they seem to get blinded by it. Like now with their Kinect. Their whole E3 was Kinect Kinect Kinect. They forgot about the heavy hitting first party and third party announcements that they used to go for.

They still have a good console and good games, they just don't have the same intimate knowledge of the industry as the other two. Obviously MS isn't complete crap, otherwise they wouldn't be as successful as they were, but they still clearly have a lot of room for improvement.

Godmars2905452d ago (Edited 5452d ago )

The thing is for the most part PS3 exclusives 1) tend to stay exclusive and 2)show some of the console's power and ability. Makes statements.

MGS4 if anything showed the value of BR, Uncharted is one of the system's graphical bars while MAG has set its multiplayer limits. In contrast what do 360 exclusives say aside from that they're on the 360, which still isn't exactly true.

Mincraft didn't start off as an Xbox IP but MS is claiming it as one and shaping it as they want. If it was available on the PS3 as many here are suggesting it might be as open as it is on the PC where it started. But because it is 360 exclusive it doesn't have to worry about a competing more open version which in turn would expose general limitations in XBL.

MS has pretty much proven that they don't like playing on an even field. They like to show that they have the advantage especially when they don't.

rob60215452d ago (Edited 5452d ago )

Heavy hitting 3rd party exclusives, while they had them early on in this gen in mass, are prohibitively expensive to pay for this late in the game.

Without a convincing argument how developing exclusively on their platform will enhance a game and poor relationships with developers, they'll have to pay up front whatever a PS3 version would potentially receive in an almost 'best case' scenario. It's much, much more than it was early on in this gen. It's also why they brought out Kinect.

I predicted this would happen to MS if this gen drags on. The only AAA game they're paying for right now is Gears 3. They simply can't afford anything else unless the quality/name are inexpensive - like the first metro was. Also, MS needs to turn a profit with 360; their shareholders are uneasy with the Xbox division - despite having more capital they're aren't as free to invest in the game division as Sony may be.

gamingdroid5451d ago

"MS has pretty much proven that they don't like playing on an even field. They like to show that they have the advantage especially when they don't."

One only sees what one wants to see....

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 5451d ago
VampiricDragon5452d ago

its not going to make alot of money.

Anyone whose playing it is doing it on the pc

rabidpancakeburglar5452d ago (Edited 5452d ago )

It will make quite a lot as people will be curious but it won't make a tonne. The point is about what Microsofts angle is, they believe that it will be a massive money maker.

Drake_Seraphim5452d ago

Can't blame them for wanting money

BeastlyRig5452d ago (Edited 5452d ago )

lol xbox needs games bad.. They will call minecraft exclusive..

Halo 4 next year & that's it..

the witcher 2 is xbox exclusive..
minecraft is xbox exclusive..

I am trolling damn it!! I can't stop!

They will take any game they can pay for because MS doesn't make games they buy them and sell them!

M$ is brilliant they announced a way for xbox owners to pay for Youtube & bing! Free services! M$ are some mean hustlers..

Series_IIa5452d ago

exclusives, exclusives, exclusives...

All this talk of exclusives and yet every week of every month the 10 ten charts are full of multiplats.

VampiricDragon5452d ago

but thats not what moves systems or makes someone buy a system

that job is for exclusives

DasTier5452d ago

@Vampiric Dragon But ive already bought my system! and have a substantial collection of good games on it! im not gonna go out and buy something which its only benefit is to be able to play heavy rain or little big planet. That would be ridiculous.

Arnon5452d ago

Wrong. Multiplatform titles have been the biggest reason people have bought their consoles.

You think the average consumer will buy a PS3 for Uncharted 3, or Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3?

captain-obvious5452d ago

i like how when this gen started and PS3 had like no exclusives and xbox was full of them

xbox fanboys where all about that
and they only talked about exclusives

now
its the other way around
so its all about multiplats
lol

gamingdroid5452d ago

Really?

Only a few select exclusives moves console and it is usually for a very short amount of time. Otherwise, PS3 would probably rival the Wii right now wouldn't we?

What makes people buy a system isn't necessarily due to a specific game, but what the system offers as an overall package. Yes, some hardcore gamers do pick a system based on a specific title (my brother did pick PS3 for MGS4 and I bought one too), but the vast majority don't....

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5452d ago
jdfoster005452d ago

Well the PSPGO has minecraft on it too... and pc ... =s And I agree with you

zeal0us5452d ago

oh boy what about the updates and M$ (horrible)update policy?

DasTier5452d ago

Minecraft is only receiving updates for as long as it is in Beta. Notch has said before that it will be released as a full game eventually. Therefore it makes sense that the game will come out when it is finished on Pc at the same time as xbox.

EVO-OM3GA5452d ago

We just want to bring Mincecraft to our console, so 360 users can experience the game if they do not own a PC or Laptop capeble of playing the game..

Is that so bad?

Dread5452d ago

only for the sony extremist haters here at n4g

GodsHand5452d ago

OMG,

recommended
CPU 3GHz Dual core
RAM 2GB
GPU AMD 4000 or Nvida equivalent

minimum
CPU 2 GHz Pentium 4 or AMD equivalent
RAM 1GB
GPU AMD 3000 or Nvida equivalent

Those are some pretty hefty specs for a game that looks 10 years old. Hopefully the coding goes better with the final release.

As a PS3 user, I would think Media Molecule would be working on a version of it's own in a open world like this, just better graphics(I would hope).

HardCover5452d ago (Edited 5452d ago )

Those specs aren't really all that bad.

Only reason they're up there is because they have to account for you running a PC with an operating system. The game itself doesn't take up all those resources as much as Win7 does (2GB of RAM and a dual core processor, see that?)

Minecraft runs on JAVA as far as I've been aware, so it obviously isn't the nicest set of code in the world, I'll give you that for sure.

IaMs125452d ago

They need to make this cross platform with the PC version so they can play together, now that would be sweet.

captain-obvious5452d ago

knowing MS
that's a long shot at the stars

IaMs125452d ago

They did it with Shadowrun so im not sure why in the hell they wont do it for others games too.

Show all comments (45)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai13d ago (Edited 13d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio13d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing13d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9213d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit13d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing13d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9213d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay15d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn216d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers16d ago (Edited 16d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn215d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown15d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos16d ago (Edited 16d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay15d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay15d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac15d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger16d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300015d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde15d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood15d ago (Edited 15d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde15d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)
50°

'The big things that we're thinking about'

In an exclusive interview with Game File, new(ish) Xbox boss Asha Sharma and Xbox chief content officer Matt Booty explain their vision for Microsoft’s gaming division

Read Full Story >>
gamefile.news
Agent7517d ago

A good start would be to release games to go with the console. My Xbox Series X has gathered dust virtually from launch. My advice would be to ditch a next console and release games on PC, PlayStation and Switch. Another idea would be a hybrid console based on Xbox Series X tech and go the same route as Nintendo. Another idea would be to pull out of gaming altogether. Plenty of options there.

Reaper22_14d ago

Why would they pull out? They have the momentum. Sony has been getting nothing but bad news lately.