All Channels
Popular
270°

Evaluating Sony’s E3 2011 Conference

There's just not much to be said about Sony's conference this year. It was by no means bad, but it wasn't all that memorable either. The PS Vita news was helpful but not stunning, and the games shown looked by-the-numbers.

Read Full Story >>
splodinator.com
Rageanitus5448d ago

Sony lots of lots of content it seems
Xbox Moving away from their core crowd ...
Nintendo.... ummm their new system has way too many gimicks.

BiggCMan5448d ago (Edited 5448d ago )

Kojima's transfarring feature really struck a blow to Nintendo's new console/controller thing. Its practically the same thing, except with transfarring, you can actually take the game anywhere, but not every game will support it. The WiiU controller can be done with every single game, but only in the vicinity of the console. They both have there ups and downs. As for the rest of those 2 conferences, they had some good moments, and some bad ones. Microsoft was mostly embarrassing again. More Halo, more Gears, more child performances with Kinect.

LoaMcLoa5448d ago

Isn't it strange that people compare the WiiU controller to NGP and still call it gimmicky?

birdy9665448d ago

That's the point, a controller shouldn't be comparable to a handheld console

Rageanitus5448d ago (Edited 5448d ago )

HOneslty i could care less about the PSVita connectivity wth the ps3 conectivity but the PSvita has alot of power to play games that is what interests me. Yesthe PS Vita has a gimmicky dual touch pad but its a sigh of relief you can play standard games on a standard control scheme on the go with dual analog.

In the end of the day the PSVita is a PORTABLE console at its core.....

news4geeks5448d ago (Edited 5448d ago )

well it's like Vita only it's cumbersome and can only be played near your console. Sounds gimmicky to me. It's like a non-portable portable system.

lol who's giving me bubbles? kind people :)

bruddahmanmatt5448d ago (Edited 5448d ago )

As a whole, I thought Sony did a fine job this year. They didn't dodge the PSN outage (even going so far as to poke fun at it here and there) and their first party lineup was impressive as ever.

As far as the PS3 is concerned, I wasn't exactly blown away by Sony's presentation, mainly because we all kind of knew what to expect. Plus they had so many titles to show off they kind of rushed a few of the presentations. The Resistance 3 demo felt kind of slapped together and hurried and I wish they showed a little more of the game. That's not to say that they didn't have an impressive showing, just that because everyone kind of had an idea of what they were going to show there weren't many surprises. The only game which really caught me off guard was the new Sly Cooper title.

The Vita however, WOW. I'm VERY impressed with where Sony is going with their new handheld and I like how they appear to be ramping up a solid lineup for the device's launch rather than making us wait a year or two for some quality content. I also appreciate how they're sticking to creating exclusive content for the device rather than just rehashing PS3 titles. This is an area that concerns me with Nintendo who hasn't done much outside of rehashing old titles for the 3DS. The only thing on the Vita which looks REALLY gimmicky is the rear touchpad. I'd have rather they found a way to put another pair of buttons on the rear of the device (R2 and L2) rather than wasting time, money and resources on something that appears to be more cumbersome than anything else.

Probably the most impressive piece of tech demonstrated IMO was the new Playstation branded 3D TV which allows two different players to see two seperate screens on one monitor via active shutter glasses. VERY cool.

As a whole, lots of content to look forward to if you own a PS3. Ico+SotC, UC3, R3 and (while it's not an exclusive) by far the most impressive looking game of the year to date, Battlefield 3.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5448d ago
GiggMan5448d ago

How many evaluations and report cards and whatever are we going to need???

lelo2play5448d ago

Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo ... all had disappointing conferences.

ForROME5448d ago (Edited 5448d ago )

Counldnt agree more and no price cuts

MS - Halo4 Nice, No Killer Instinct boo
SONY - UC3 Nice, Cross game chat on vita & not PS3 Boo
Nintendo - Just Boo in general

-Alpha5448d ago

Agreed, this year was pretty much less interesting than last when all three were said and done.

Tommykrem5448d ago

Maybe your expectations are too high :P
Can't be 2009 every year, you know.

ALFAxD_CENTAURO5448d ago (Edited 5448d ago )

PSV and Dust 514 as Exclusive amazing announcement.
http://www.youtube.com/watc...

Is going to be revolutionary in the MMO Genre, and PS3 is the 1st console in the experiment.

Show all comments (22)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
10d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted10d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy859d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele9d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla9d ago (Edited 9d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk9d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay9d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 9d ago
Athlon10110d ago (Edited 10d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit9d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg9d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon1019d ago (Edited 9d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz1499d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
23d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_23d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle22d ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker23d ago (Edited 23d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit22d ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog23d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_23d ago (Edited 23d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog22d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad23d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_23d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage23d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda22d ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

22d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
40°

Sony Shows Off 20 Minutes of Crimson Desert on a Base PS5

Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
BlazedKong48d ago

looks god awful on the base systems