510°

Microsoft releases impressive stats before E3

Weeks before E3, Microsoft shows its current domination over its competitor PS3, and even the Wii. With its launch of the successful Kinect and games, the Xbox 360 easily has the best growth by a large margin. Check out all the stats after the break!!

Read Full Story >>
majornelson.com
EasilyTheBest5441d ago

Good numbers and a good graph.

Nintendo must be worried looking at that.

If Microsoft can bring out some good new casual games and a few hardcore controller and Kinect titles they should have a great christmas.

Its all about creating a buzz about your product and thats exactly what Kinect has right now.

a_squirrel5441d ago (Edited 5441d ago )

Personally, I'm not too convinced myself.

Btw, it's USA stats.

thereapersson5441d ago

I'm actually more excited to see what MS has to offer at this year's E3 than Sony, even though Sony is the primary focus for me. All the waiting and anticipating to see what potential they have for Kinect and the 360's game lineup; it's quite high. I'm quite curious as to what exclusives they'll announce this year.

JhawkFootball065441d ago

Why cant you give credit where credit is due. So what if its only USA only. Still very impressive.

On a side note, I'd be worried for Nintendo, The Wii is on a huge decline. Im expecting the next gen Wii to come out sooner than expected.

Biggest5441d ago

You mean like, now? The new Nintendo console is going to be announced at E3 and will probably release by the end of the year. They are a few steps ahead of your worry.

darthv725441d ago

ms's focus on gaming first when the system released is the driving force behind its popularity. The addition of pc connectivity and media features as an after thought only added to the perceived value of the system.

Where sony stumbled a bit was in thinking the brand recognition and power of the name would drive the sales of the ps3 when its games were of no better/worse quality of its closest competitor.

Relying on the bluray to be some sort of trojan horse like dvd was with the ps2 did not work in their favor. At least...to the level sony execs expected. Even if you are a sony only gamer you have to give credit to MS and their determination to be a real player this gen.

It seems to try and bring out the best in all platforms.

gamingdroid5441d ago (Edited 5441d ago )

I doubt Nintendo is worried as you can already see where this is heading. Nintendo are already planning their next release, and the next generation they got the upper hand technology wise for a while.

If anything, Sony is being squeezed. Sony has a lot of good exclusive quality games, but both the hardcore and high-end market is saturated. Nintendo will have the most powerful console soon while Sony aren't really hitting the casual market.

Xbox 360 has a lot of legroom for price drop, in good position with strong growth and Kinect is pushing Xbox 360 consoles.

Undoubtedly current PS3 owners will be happy with upcoming releases and arguably that is all that matters.

We will have to wait and see what MS does in that regards, but Gears of War 3 is coming out soon which keeps me happy.

malamdra5441d ago Show
tawak5441d ago Show
Lyr1c5441d ago

To my knowledge, this site is called "News 4 Gamers", not "News for Stockholders".

Why must sales be constantly spewed, as if they make a difference quality wise?

Good for Microsoft, but it doesn't make a difference to any true "gamers".

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 5441d ago
EagleBurn5441d ago

Well with the Kinect selling faster than what the Wii did, which is saying A LOT, it really isn't that surprising

Biggest5441d ago

No it isn't saying a lot. The Wii is a console. The Kinect is a camera. The 360 isn't selling faster than the Wii did. The camera is being bought by the people that had a 360 at a fast rate.

gamingdroid5441d ago

Yes, but at almost the same price as the Wii itself!

Not to mention, the increase in Xbox 360 sales. Remember Xbox 360 + Kinect is almost twice as expensive as a Wii.

k-dillinger5441d ago (Edited 5441d ago )

@EagleBurn well when you put over half a billion into marketing on something of course ppl where going to buy it ninty didnt have to do that nor sony so nooooo xbox doesn't get any cool points thats bought success my friend....

FACTUAL evidence5441d ago ShowReplies(5)
OllieBoy5441d ago

Not one single exclusive released for the 360 this year so far. Glad they can appease their fanbase with sales numbers, though.

It's amazing how much of a free pass M$ gets.

guigsy5441d ago (Edited 5441d ago )

Just shows that the mass market doesn't care about exclusives. As long as the software is there you're good to go.

Kon5441d ago

best answer here so far.

death2smoochie5441d ago

Its multi-platform games that sell...and considering 85% of the games released in a calender year are multi-platform, its no surprise that exclusives fall behind in that area.
Its a numbers game.

SuperLupe5441d ago (Edited 5441d ago )

Prior to this gen:

Sony = 240 million consoles sold, ten years experience, Playstation synonymous with gaming

MS = 25 million consoles sold.

And with no exclusives whatsoever this year so far MS are STILL leading Sony five years later.

Sony better do some serious thinking about how the heck they're still last before launching the PS4.

DrillaKid5441d ago

Experience doesnt count for much in the world of tech; it's dominated the feelings of consumers at a point in time; look at Nokia - their days are numbered but 10 years ago they controlled the mobile market.

Likewise Sony and MS are considered "has beens" in corporate terms - both their share prices have been declining; when you think of tech now Google, Apple and Facebook spring to mind.

5441d ago
kneon5441d ago

One little thing they missed out from their graph is that despite a 29% increase they are still being outsold by the PS3 world wide. They gave it a shot with Kinect and even though it sold amazing it wasn't enough to stop their lead eroding.

Pyscho_Mantis5441d ago

sony till has a larger market share dude...you forget the psp, the ps3, ps2 which still all sell. The profits of Playstation have been much larger than the Xbox division for some time due to Sony having multiple consoles.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5441d ago
lugia 40005441d ago

Yea people gotta make up some stuff just to screw with Microsoft.

EagleBurn5441d ago

Show credit to where its due. The US is a large chunk of the gaming industry and it's still really impressive.

Max_Dissatisfaction5441d ago

You care enough about sales to already have 2 comments in here.
I gotta admit, Microsoft know how to market themselves right. No retail exclusives, couple of awesome exclusive XBLA games and they manage to have the BEST YEAR in xbox history so far...in their 6th year!
Imagine how well they'll do next half WITH exclusive games.
To all the people saying USA only, may I ask you what the biggest gaming market is?
May I ask you what region sells more games than ALL of Europe, Australia AND Africa COMBINED??! It's all good to be well rounded and international but what good does your well roundedness help you when your game sales are the lowest in total?
Do you guys know that when the ps3 launched there were only 18 million 360 games purchased? Do you know that the difference has now grown to over 90 million?
Do you know that when Microsoft launched 360 one of their objectives was to beat SONY in North America? Well they have done just that and judging by software sales we all know why they wanted to.
Win North America, win the world, just ask Nintendo.

aia125441d ago

if it was ps3 that had sold thatmuch and was ahead of 360 you'd care about sales lol

death2smoochie5441d ago (Edited 5441d ago )

So true its only the USA... Unfortunately for Sony, the USA makes up the bulk of consumer hardware/software sales for console gaming.
So until Sony can overtake MS in the USA on a consistent basis here on out, the PS3 will never pass the Xbox360 overall in sales.
This is of course if you care about sales LOL

5441d ago
Pyscho_Mantis5441d ago

WRONG you forget about Japan Sony's trump card. The ps3 consistently outsells the 360 ten times as much each week and the gap difference makes up for the majority of the gap difference in the US. The rest is accounted by playstations majority in Europe.

death2smoochie5439d ago (Edited 5439d ago )

@mantis

Japan is no longer the trump card. It was once the largest gaming demographics in the world. That is no longer the case. Japan numbers are almost always offset by North American numbers so nothing changes.

The reality is still consistent:

Sony needs to secure the USA over MS in order to outsell them OVERALL.
Without the USA, Sony will not succeed this generation in beating the Xbox360 in overall sales...With or without Japans sales.
Numbers do not lie.

@Clarence

Sony released its overall sales numbers and its very much different from your source you quoted.
So unless you do not trust Sony's OWN financials over a website such as Wikipedia, then by all means do not go to the source and trust a second hand source for your information :P

Redgehammer5441d ago

55 million is for the world, and the PS3 is at 50.6 for the world.

Clarence5441d ago

Sony has more than 50m console sold.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/w...

The PS3 was at 50m in march it's now June and the PS3 has been outselling the 360 worldwide for the last 3yrs. Not only that but the PS3 has outsold the 360 worldwide in since the start of 2011.

This article is somewhat misleading, because it talks about how well the 360 in all the countries, when in fact they have lost the lead over the PS3 in Europe. Despite the 1yr and half headstart. The 360 sales in Japan are horrible.

For past 3yrs the PS3 has outsold the 360. Last year the PS3 outsold the 360 by 2.3m despite halo and kinect.

Redgehammer5440d ago

I am just giving you the numbers Sony released a few weeks ago. However, if you want to trust Wikipedia over Sony that is your choice.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5439d ago
nightmarex1215441d ago

yeah if they can bring the momentum imagine during the holiday season it be an explosion lold.

Brian52475441d ago

No one gives a shit about stats, they care about GAMES. Of which MS has a scant few.

manumit5441d ago

Oh someone had to start, how many times does an article come thorugh on N4G with stats compard to "GAMES". Embrace it man!

BlackTar1875441d ago

embrace what the fact that your celebrating sales figures instead of new game announcements..

Im American and i don;t get the appeal of sales figures over all. its like hey we don' have many games coming out that defines our system of choice but we keep selling more WINNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN

darthv725441d ago

actually...ms has plenty of games. What you may be eluding to are "exclusives" which this gen has proven are not the big selling point.

Games are games if they are from 1st, 2nd or 3rd parties. If you offer a diverse selection of titles to your customers, they respond. No different than with the ps2 and its vast library of games for everyone. You cant only cater to one demographic anymore.

Rattlehead205441d ago

Well Microsoft care more about sales stats than games..

Thats where their money comes from.

-Alpha5441d ago

@Goodfella

Pull out the articles on PS3 closing in on 360 sales and see how many people on here care about sales.

It's a factor in console wars and people love to brag about it when its on their side and act as if it doesn't matter when it works against them

Show all comments (109)
50°

'The big things that we're thinking about'

In an exclusive interview with Game File, new(ish) Xbox boss Asha Sharma and Xbox chief content officer Matt Booty explain their vision for Microsoft’s gaming division

Read Full Story >>
gamefile.news
Agent7516h ago

A good start would be to release games to go with the console. My Xbox Series X has gathered dust virtually from launch. My advice would be to ditch a next console and release games on PC, PlayStation and Switch. Another idea would be a hybrid console based on Xbox Series X tech and go the same route as Nintendo. Another idea would be to pull out of gaming altogether. Plenty of options there.

160°

Xbox Game Pass Ultimate Price Update

Starting today, Game Pass Ultimate drops from $29.99 to $22.99 a month. PC Game Pass will also drop from $16.49 to $13.99 a month. Prices may vary by region.

Beginning this year, future Call of Duty titles won’t join Game Pass Ultimate or PC Game Pass at launch. New Call of Duty games will be added to Game Pass Ultimate and PC Game Pass during the following holiday season (about a year later), while existing Call of Duty titles already in the library will continue to be available.

Read Full Story >>
news.xbox.com
Neonridr5d ago

can't wait to hear how this is spun negatively.

darthv725d ago

Its nice there is some kind of drop... but is that all they really value CoD to be, a lousy $7 a month?

I was hoping it would drop by $10.

MisterBoots5d ago

That $7 equates to $84 per year - which is more than COD new ($69.99 + tax).

So - you can get the exact same thing - and save a few bucks - or you can skip COD and pocket the savings or use toward another game - or games if on sale.

That’s how I’m taking it - and is enough for me to sign back up after canceling the day it went to $29.99.

fr0sty5d ago

It's unlikely that COD is going to be the only title they stop offering day one, but we'll see how they play their hand.

VenomUK4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Including Call of Duty in Game Pass is just leaving money on the table. When the Elder Scrolls VI releases hopefully Microsoft doesn’t launch it into Game Pass. Then it can make more profits and use it give more value to Xbox console owners!

1Victor5d ago

Can’t wait to hear how this will be spun extremely positive. 🤣
I wonder why knowing Microsoft thick head something must has happened in the background in the levels of Xbox one and Kinect 🤷🏿

fr0sty5d ago

Any price cut is a good thing in this day and age, but it also reveals a flaw in GamePass' design that we've all been calling out for years... it's unsustainable, especially with day and date releases on new games. COD won't be the only game they exclude, they're setting a precedent with it that they'll likely expand upon in the future.

At least they're being realistic about it now. I bet in the future we're going to start seeing them try to subsidize the high price of new consoles by making you buy 2-3 years of gamepass with it to get the console cheaper. I'm still not sure that'll be enough to save either the hardware or gamepass, but we'll see.

Neonridr5d ago

price cuts are good, the removal of Call of Duty is clearly something they are planning to leverage. But considering everyone around N4G claims Call of Duty sucks, it's not a big loss now is it?

LucasRuinedChildhood5d ago (Edited 5d ago )

Well, they're removing their biggest game from being Day 1 on the service so GamePass users can buy it instead. That's the intention.

They increased the price to $30, then removed COD and dropped it to still be above the old price.

It's an understandable compromise but the consumer Ultimately is getting less.

Think the calculation is that *most* COD users don't play that many games and aren't interested in GamePass. The GamePass users who do like COD would just buy it anyway. MS reportedly lost out a lot of money last year putting COD on GamePass.

Bathyj5d ago (Edited 5d ago )

Well Call of duty could just be the beginning. What other games can they trim from the service to get the price down? How long before it's just the Xbox core first party studio games and not the one to everquired?

Create an interesting scenario with Call of duty as well. Will people wait a year to play it? Does that split the fan base? Will it hurt to Call of duty more than a benefits Game pass? These are all legitimate questions which we will find the answers to in the coming years

And I don't consider my post negative spin just realistic observation. At the very least this backtracking can be seen as an admittance that the previous strategy of gamepass was not sustainable as most of us said.

darthv725d ago

I'd get rid of the EA and Ubisoft+ too. That should bring the price down more. The only game from either of those parts of the service i played was jedi Fallen order / survivor. both of which i also bought on disc so it was more of a convenience i didnt have to put the disc in to play when i was playing them via remote play. And really that is why i still use GPU and PS+. its the convenience of having the games ready to play from a remote location. I havent picked up my consoles controllers in at least a few years. I guess that makes me a bad gamer, but so what. i'm still playing the games, just not physically on the machines themselves. GCloud and Portal are my go to now.

GhostScholar5d ago

They’ll say no one is buying game pass so they had to drop the price , even though it’s been extremely profitable.

Outside_ofthe_Box5d ago

Why remove CoD if it's *extremely* profitable then? Why even increase it to begin with?

Outside_ofthe_Box5d ago

Always funny seeing those that defended the price hike go "how you gonna spin this now!" after the price drops.

You should be thanking those that called it out. Obviously this is a good thing especially with everything increasing nowadays.

Also, what happened to the reason why that the Activision acquisition was good for gaming was that CoD would be day one on GamePass? Another backtrack on that I guess...

What removing CoD on GamePass shows, is that it's not sustainable for for the more popular and/or bigger budget games because of the sales you lose out on like people have been saying since inception. It never made sense to put CoD on there unless you thought it's popularity would draw in a lot of subscribers which it obviously didn't. And if it was as sustainable as people claim they wouldn't have increased the price while putting it on there in the first place.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4d ago
5d ago
KicksnSnares5d ago (Edited 5d ago )

New Xbox Boss the 🐐?

5d ago
Vits5d ago

In my region, it’s still more expensive than it was before the last price hike, but it’s a far more viable price point.

Losing Call of Duty from the service, honestly, has zero effect on me, and given they chose to make it so, it’s probably not the big seller they originally thought. Overall, it’s really good news, but I still think they have work to do on the tier structure, having Premium and PC at the same price point with different features feels odd.

Lightning775d ago

Yep take COD out. Them waiting a year is interesting but it make sense. They don't want certain ppl waiting 4 to 6 months they want fomo and maximum sales. Wait a year while the new one releases.

Ok so far so good.

Show all comments (46)
90°

Starfield Was the Best-Selling Game in the US Following PS5 Release

Senior Director and Video Game Industry Advisor at Circana Mat Piscatella has revealed Starfield was the best-selling video in the US based on dollar sales for the week ending April 11th.

Read Full Story >>
vgchartz.com
jznrpg6d ago

For the week that nothing else of note launched.. I’m sure it will sell some copies but look at what released that week

6d ago Replies(6)
z2g5d ago

It’s not a requirement to buy games every month or whenever one is released. I don’t think people are going to spend $70+ on something they don’t care about.

GotGame8185d ago

I have talked about not being able to get into this game at launch. I still haven't given it another go, even though I think it looks great and has come a very long way since launch. Some people just want it to fail, even if it is a great game. I know why, we all do.

Starfield didn't just have the best sales for a week, but it was pre-ordered on PS store, with very nice numbers. I really need to start it again, on my PS5 though. So I can see how it is now. It has had some major updates.

I am looking forward to it all over again now.

Huey_My_D_Long5d ago

Its not that people want the game to fail. Its that Bethesda wont ever improve their games if you guys keep calling slop like starfield great games. Pure as that. Formulaic, chasing the trends, slop.

Like Bethesda has fallen off since FO4.

Ive a PC 4070, no interest in Starfield since the beginning since despite Bethesda owning some serious FPS legacy within their ranks...They just like seem to hate good shooting mechanics.

I dont see whats the appeal and thats ok. But how can you guys call it great? By what metric? The story? The Gameplay? The package all together? Hell I'm enjoying Crimson Desert, but I've got my issues with some design choices, but I do think the game is better as a whole than its individual parts. Is that the case for Starfield?
To be honest alot of you starfield stans dont make a great case for yourself, since I've never heard a starfield say what it is they enjoyed about it other just it being another Bethesda game that feels familiar yet new to them. Yall dont make the case on whats so great about starfield that keeps you coming back.
What does it do that makes it great that everyone like me is missing?

Like I wanted to like the Starfield, but after seeing its first trailer, it pretty much came out like I thought it was. Bethesda has been coasting off prestige for years now. and honestly starfield is proof of that.

CrimsonIdol5d ago

I'm fine with the game being janky Bethesda-core etc. For what it's worth it's more polished than previous games have been and the shooting mechanics are fine, feels pretty good even.

What I'm not fine with is it just being completely dull in every way. Even if they managed to resolve the structure of the game constantly sending you back and forth through maps and loading screens it's still going to be dull. The original The Outer Worlds did Fallout in space better, and that was hardly perfect (I haven't played the second one so I can't comment on that). At least The Outer Worlds had some interesting characters, enemies and locations. Starfield has none of that. They can argue that it's more grounded/going for realism or some nonsense (yet it's still doing Star Wars/Firefly style space travel) but it's fundamentally dull.

I dropped loads of money on a copy of this game at launch and I've no desire to get my money's worth out of it, I pretty quickly cut my losses and moved on. I don't know what happened to the writers for Bethesda, I presume they all moved on and have since been replaced by Jenny from accounting.

sweatyrich5d ago

I agree with @CrimsonIdol
I played the game to completed, but it's version of NG+ simply didn't appeal to me, so I never went back to it.
There's base-building, but it really serves no point, other than, there's base building. If you're into that, you have it, but I didn't touch it at all, as it wasn't part of the story ... At all.

The main character models are "ok", but the NPCs are just bad.

And IMO, people shouldn't be OK with a Bethesda game being janky. They're a big company, and should be jank-free by now!

MrBaskerville4d ago

I've given it another go and with the new more modular difficulty i managed to balance it a bit like Stalker 2 and it has been a lot more enjoyable this time around. The free roaming in space also helps a bit. Still prefer older Bethesda games, but it's growing on me
ever so slowly.

Jin_Sakai5d ago

Curious gamers. They’ll soon find out soon enough how trash it is.

Reaper22_5d ago

I dont think so. The games has been well received on PS5. Getting good scores too.

Jin_Sakai5d ago

Digital Foundry showed how bad the game runs even on PS5 Pro and crashes. It can’t even hold 60fps and not a looker to begin with. 🤷‍♂️

Grilla5d ago

I found out. I loved FO4 and wanted to judge Starfield for myself. I should have waited for a sale.

Putte5d ago

It's still as Bad as it was on Xbox. Of cause some playstation user's are curious and because there is a lot of them then the sales are gonna be somewhat okay for small time period. But still a very sad story what starfield turned out to be. Maybe the biggest disappointment in my gaming life.

Show all comments (34)