All Channels
210°

How MS will make XBL and Kinect better

Microsoft is working hard to improve 10-million selling motion sensing add-on Kinect so that the games you play feel and control better.

Improvements made by Microsoft to the way the Xbox 360 works with Kinect mean it will detect finger movement – and even pointing.

Eurogamer sources have indicated that gamers should see "pretty big improvements" in the short term via new software updates.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
darthv725445d ago

that there would be improvements to the software. The hardware is capable and it is with good software that these abilities are brought forth.

Just look at how the evolution of the ps3 or 360 has progressed through the software from launch to now. Same hardware people. Just better software. Kinect is no different.

Inzo5445d ago

What do you mean make kinect "better"? I thought the kinect was the be all and end all of gaming.

taylork375445d ago

I would love to see a link to someone who said that.

Inzo5444d ago

no need for a link, just watch M$ 2010 E3 conference.

Chocoboh5445d ago

10 million sales is pretty impressive but I'd be disapointed to see nothing less when they had a $500 million in advertising. The only downside is that Microsoft will focus more on Kinect then the Xbox over all since it's their new toy and has done well.

user8586215445d ago

Show me gameplay of

Codename D
Haunt
Star Wars
Project Draco
Rise of Nightmares
Steel Battalion

edhe5445d ago

Guessing you want majornelson to PM you links, right?

Godmars2905445d ago (Edited 5445d ago )

Certainly haven't been doing it directly, by say, offering games which proves that it even works in the first place.

No seriously: Kinect/Natal started off more than a year - two? - before it was released as being shown as a working product. Quotes from a number of devs talking up its "potential." Then it was released amid a Vegas level circus show and forced cult worship with signs of potential coming from hacks and mods on PC rather than official games, none of which were done by the devs who talked it up. New nearly a year later and we're still pretty much waiting for signs of promised potential when its most noted "game" is Dance Central.

And now they're talking about making it better via updates when first generation Kinect titles - such as waseem335 has listed - have yet to be solidly shown, only talked about?

Motion control has already proven to be pointless with the Wii - why continue this crap?!

B1663r5445d ago (Edited 5445d ago )

Notice how all the big games are release in october, november, and december? That is because those are the big months for video game consoles and games. That way you are releasing and advertising games when people are likely to buy them.

If they wait until the next advertising blast kicks off, all the kinect games will get a boost.

Never release a new product before labor day and all that.

Also, 1/2 a year isn't almost a year. It is about 6 months. Thats right, the Kinect has been plaguing kinect haters for only half a year. We are still in that awkward time where the big money was going to be kept off the table to see if the thing was going to be a success. Well its been a success, and the tidal wave of games will start coming this fall.

Godmars2905445d ago (Edited 5445d ago )

Half a billion dollars isn't big money...

And while you're pondering that bit of economics, ask yourself what other systems had shown and put out within a six month span. What games were being talked about an demoed before a systems launch.

Then remind yourself that Kinect is only an add-on. That for what it actually is and for the amount of time its been talked about, shown off, the amount of money invested, its been cut too much slack.

Edit@gamingdroid:
Not saying you're wrong, but MS has had two years to develop Kinect games. They had two years to get their 2nd party devs to make Kinect games.

I'm not complaining about game system that's only been out for six months, I'm complaining about a game system add-on that's been talked about and shown working two years before it was actually released. That was given $500m to sell it.

gamingdroid5445d ago

The fact is that it takes most developers at least 2-years to develop a game, NO scratch that, I meant A SEQUEL!

Just look at all these games:

- CoD
- Gears of War
- Infamous
- Uncharted
- Mass Effect

Different game, same story. At least 2-years for core games with known gameplay mechanic, re-use of the same engine, re-use of artwork and just about re-use of everything else.

Yet, you are complaining about a product that has been out about 6-months. The product itself whom has only been conceived maybe 3-years ago. Only some of the developers have even had the very early dev-kits for 2-years and to top it off, developers/publisher want to see adoption before investing. Only a moron would invest simply because of technology sake....

Even if they had great stuff, they aren't going to show it to you until they are closer to release it for competitive reasons. Amateurs don't have to worry about that competition and do stuff for fun.

The fact that you have seen quality titles from MS and a host of great ideas from the community speaks volume of the potential. I challenge you to show me something as exciting and with as many new ideas as Kinect with anything from any of the other two?

I am very excited to see what MS is bringing E3 this year in regards to Kinect after reading that article.

Show all comments (18)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai1d 1h ago (Edited 1d 1h ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio18h ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing16h ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9217h ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit17h ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing16h ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9215h ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay2d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn23d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn22d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown2d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay2d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay2d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac2d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger3d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster30003d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde3d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde2d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)
50°

'The big things that we're thinking about'

In an exclusive interview with Game File, new(ish) Xbox boss Asha Sharma and Xbox chief content officer Matt Booty explain their vision for Microsoft’s gaming division

Read Full Story >>
gamefile.news
Agent754d ago

A good start would be to release games to go with the console. My Xbox Series X has gathered dust virtually from launch. My advice would be to ditch a next console and release games on PC, PlayStation and Switch. Another idea would be a hybrid console based on Xbox Series X tech and go the same route as Nintendo. Another idea would be to pull out of gaming altogether. Plenty of options there.

Reaper22_1d 20h ago

Why would they pull out? They have the momentum. Sony has been getting nothing but bad news lately.