All Channels
Popular
140°

Sony 'Considering' 3G Multiplayer for NGP

Speaking to NowGamer vice president of Sony Worldwide Studios Europe Michael Denny has revealed that Sony is looking at plans for bringing 3G options to NGP

Read Full Story >>
nowgamer.com
Istanbull5470d ago

This is not news. Back in January they said the NGP will be availbe in 2 options:

Non 3G and 3G models.

MintBerryCrunch5470d ago

in terms of MP...its believed that MP will be done through wi-fi...the 3G would be for D/L games/apps...accessing the internet and so on

they are looking at all options as the interview states...so we'll see what they decide to implement

fastrez5470d ago

3G multiplayer would surely be expensive and a strain on the network. Will be cool to see how it pans out.

blumatt5470d ago

Yeah, 3G would be hard on the network if it's gonna be used for online multiplayer. It'll most likely be just for downloading apps/games. However, I'd love to be able to play online multiplayer anywhere. Would be sick!

xAlmostPro5470d ago

3g multiplayer wuld be a lagfest tbh, trying to play online via a mobile network.. no thanks lol

i'll be getting the non 3g model most likely anyway

Ju5470d ago

3G MP will be there as was said before. It is one of the major goals of the device. However, I'd like to see what latency 3G introduces to online play. Technically it is no different than WiFi. All the App/Game sees is an IP connection. The rest is simple handled by the OS.

Zir05470d ago (Edited 5470d ago )

So currently you can't play online games on the go, only with Wifi?

Which means online gaming can only really be played at home, which no one would do since they could just play their PS3.

Looks like one of the biggest draws of the NGP got taken away :(

@MintBerryCrunch
Those still require you to remain in the same place meaning you can't play online "on-the-go" which it what I'm getting at. And I doubt anyone will bother hunting down a rare free hotspot just to play their NGP.

MintBerryCrunch5470d ago (Edited 5470d ago )

i guess you never heard of wi-fi hotspots

edit:

who plays games on the go?? that argument is weak imo...if im walking somewhere...my attention is on where im going...once i get there is when i put my focus towards gaming

creamsoda5470d ago

Haha I know right? Especially these days walking around with an NGP around your most likely gonna dropt it, get it stolen, or lose it. I will only play it at home.

Ju5470d ago

As a passenger in a car? Bus? Any kind of public transportation without a hot spot?

TrevorPhillips5470d ago

I just literally had a heart attack after reading that!

Cannot wait for the NGP xD

creamsoda5470d ago

I wonder how far the wi-fi will be.. Like 100 feet radius to a hotspot?

MasterCornholio5470d ago

If multiplayer can be done well with 3G i say go ahead. Would be awesome to be in the middle of nowhere and play a game online with a bunch of friends.

Show all comments (18)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
28d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted27d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8527d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele27d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla27d ago (Edited 27d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk27d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay27d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 27d ago
Athlon10127d ago (Edited 27d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit27d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg26d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10126d ago (Edited 26d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14927d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
40d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_40d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle40d ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker40d ago (Edited 40d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit40d ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog40d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_40d ago (Edited 40d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog40d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad40d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_40d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage40d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda40d ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

40d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
40°

Sony Shows Off 20 Minutes of Crimson Desert on a Base PS5

Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
BlazedKong66d ago

looks god awful on the base systems