All Channels
Popular
300°

160gb Black Ops: First Strike PS3 Bundle for $199 After E3?

Many have rumored a PS3 price drop at E3. Sony has announced the COD: Black Ops First Strike bundle for PS3 to release May 31 for $299. Could this end up being slashed in price at the E3 Sony Press Conference?

Read Full Story >>
examiner.com
SpaceSquirrel5466d ago

I hope so.I think the PS3 is due for a price drop.

guitarded775466d ago (Edited 5466d ago )

I hope so too... one of my buddies is such a cheap ass he's waiting for the $200 price point. It's not that he doesn't have the money, he's just a cheap ass. $250 sounds more like it though.

AAACE55466d ago (Edited 5466d ago )

Woah! That's the price consoles get dropped to when the new console is being released next year!

It's a bit too soon for a big drop like that!

BattleAxe5466d ago

Call the cops, I think that theres a steal in the works!

NoobSessions5466d ago (Edited 5466d ago )

Thats not really being a cheap ass. Well for me, I already own an Xbox 360 and a decent PC rig. Spending $300 for another console seems like alot at that point IMO. Im waiting for a price drop since money's kinda tight.

squallheart5466d ago

We just got thos at target but not allowed to put out yet should have checked the price

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5466d ago
blumatt5466d ago (Edited 5466d ago )

A $200 PS3 would be pretty darn unstoppable. A slew of exclusive games and an awesome price point as well as reliable hardware, would be a HUGE win for gamers.

And this bundle looks good. CoD people will eat it up.

SoapShoes5466d ago

Yeah but why would they bring it out now and have it at $299 for a week just to slash the price? I don't think it'll drop at E3 but you never know. I do have a strong feeling that it will drop sometime this year though but probably not till Gamescom.

aceitman5466d ago

even $249 is a sweet spot .

TXIDarkAvenger5466d ago (Edited 5466d ago )

Hmm...where I live its already priced at $250. So 250 doesn't seem much of a drop.

nvm, I get what u mean...

5466d ago
fluffydelusions5466d ago

$199 for that bundle? No way. $249 best case scenario.

Hitman07695466d ago

I wonder if this will turn out how everyone is expecting with the $199 price point. It doesn't seem unlikely to me at all.

Boody-Bandit5466d ago (Edited 5466d ago )

I could've swore I just heard this from someone on a yet to be released podcast during the E3 expectations and predictions round.

*pulls out crystal ball*
Yes Sony will announce a drop the price to $199 at E3.

rob60215466d ago

You're going to spoil the surprise; or cause an outrage of People mocking a $50 price drop or none at all. Either way speculating low like this doesn't help Sony. It keeps them from having a 'bang' at E3. I would like to speculate 360 going down to $99 this E3 - maybe with a live contract or something lol.

LiamIRL825466d ago

199 would be a wonderful price, it seems unlikely but who knows. A 199 price would send the sales into the stratosphere. But as others have said 249 seems more likely.

Show all comments (36)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
17d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted17d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8516d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele16d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla16d ago (Edited 16d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk16d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay16d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 16d ago
Athlon10117d ago (Edited 17d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit16d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg16d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10116d ago (Edited 16d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14916d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
30d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_30d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle29d ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker30d ago (Edited 30d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit29d ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog30d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog29d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad30d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_29d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage29d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda29d ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

29d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
40°

Sony Shows Off 20 Minutes of Crimson Desert on a Base PS5

Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
BlazedKong55d ago

looks god awful on the base systems