All Channels
Popular
260°

Which Game Publisher Will Sue Sony First?

"Well, the siege continues with Sony’s Playstation network. Sure, you can play Killzone 3 with your friend in Abu Dhabi, but you still can’t buy anything off the store, including those two free games that Sony was offering as recompense for their service being down for the better part of a month."- Shanghai Six

Read Full Story >>
fronttowardsgamer.com
rabidpancakeburglar5483d ago ShowReplies(2)
Batman52735483d ago ShowReplies(1)
Fir3truck5483d ago ShowReplies(1)
Del6735483d ago

The points brought up are very valid. Potential revenue losses are not something publishers and more importantly movie and TV execs will take lying down. The store being down for as long as it was affected their bottom lines in some way and someone will come forward to try to recoup some losses.

nickjkl5482d ago

okay guys lets sue every store that closes at night bitches be losing that revenue

besides this is almost as bad as the pirating revenue

aka

it hypothetically cost us this indeterminable amount of money we will just say quoting from article

"hundreds of thousands, if not millions of dollars"

jadenkorri5481d ago

most ridiculous argument ever. If devs sue for lost sales through psn/live/steam/etc due to downtimes, then walmart/futureshop/GS/EB/best buy could sue devs for products not received. How many times have we gone in to buy a game and told the shipment didn't come in.

SoapShoes5482d ago

If I were Sony I'd refuse to let them be apart of the PSN Store if that were the case. Unfortunately they lost money, so did Sony, but if they want to take action they can just stay off for good.

It's another source of revenue they didn't have before the PS3/PSP so they should be happy it's there at all!

Happythedog5482d ago

XD XD XD XD XD

Thank you that made me laugh.

Kleptic5482d ago

it is pretty obvious that the author isn't entirely aware of how all this works legally...not that I do exactly either, but i'm not writing articles like this...

but first of all...the zipper thing is ridiculous because Sony owns them...its PUBLISHERS that have legal grounds for complaining about losses...and with Sony being the publisher of Socom 4...what are they going to do, sue themselves?

but more importantly...none of us have, or have seen, exact contracts 3rd party publishers sign in to when using the playstation network...I am about 100% positive Sony has plenty of legalalize in there that states if an outside attack reaches the PSN as a whole, they have the legal right to remove its services to consumers in order to deal with it...which will DIRECTLY effect 3rd party publisher sales and revenue because of it...without any harm coming to Sony about it...

that is the point...this wasn't Sony pulling down the PSN for the hell of it internally...they pulled it down because it was attacked by an outside source...and that is exactly where pissed off publishers need to go to look for their money...if they can prove that it was entirely Sony's fault (which it wasn't), then they have a case for sueing Sony...

If Wal-Mart or a Best Buy gets blown up by some guy with a bomb...distributors selling their shit at that store can't sue wal mart or best buy because no one is buying their stuff...this is no different...

the only thing they can do is chose to not have their stuff available on the PSN now...which they won't do...business people love to say 'we lost all this money' in situations where that is not reality...its actually 'we planned on making all this money, but didn't'...its just that that doesn't sound as convincing to the public or a court...

supremacy5482d ago (Edited 5482d ago )

Yeah on top of that i believe sony will compensate these publishers with free promotion on the psn store, and give them better marketing and even dedicate seperate themes to the store for them.

Which will in return make em that lost revenue in short time.

I think publishers understand the situation and will most likely deal with it going forward.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5481d ago
blackburn105483d ago

It's lame because why is anyone trying to guess which publisher will sue Sony first? It's like watching a car race and trying to guess who will die in a fiery car crash. Reporting that a developer is suing Sony is one thing but eagerly prematurely trying to guess which ones is crap. We all know a developer COULD sue Sony,even though they haven't actually lost anything because they will still get the money back when the store comes back. If I wrote an article on how many games Microsoft probably won't have at E3 I guarantee no Xbox fanboy would be saying 'good points there'.

MWong5482d ago

I got to agree with you on this. It's just the "media," if you can call them that, trying to stir the pot.

Show all comments (32)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
31d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted30d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8530d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele30d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla30d ago (Edited 30d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk29d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay29d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 29d ago
Athlon10130d ago (Edited 30d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit29d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg29d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10129d ago (Edited 29d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14930d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
43d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_43d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle43d ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker43d ago (Edited 43d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit43d ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog43d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_43d ago (Edited 43d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog43d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad43d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_43d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage43d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda43d ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

43d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
40°

Sony Shows Off 20 Minutes of Crimson Desert on a Base PS5

Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
BlazedKong69d ago

looks god awful on the base systems