
"Well, the siege continues with Sony’s Playstation network. Sure, you can play Killzone 3 with your friend in Abu Dhabi, but you still can’t buy anything off the store, including those two free games that Sony was offering as recompense for their service being down for the better part of a month."- Shanghai Six

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.
Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.
Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses
The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.
Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.
I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.
There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.
I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.
I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.
Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.
The points brought up are very valid. Potential revenue losses are not something publishers and more importantly movie and TV execs will take lying down. The store being down for as long as it was affected their bottom lines in some way and someone will come forward to try to recoup some losses.
It's lame because why is anyone trying to guess which publisher will sue Sony first? It's like watching a car race and trying to guess who will die in a fiery car crash. Reporting that a developer is suing Sony is one thing but eagerly prematurely trying to guess which ones is crap. We all know a developer COULD sue Sony,even though they haven't actually lost anything because they will still get the money back when the store comes back. If I wrote an article on how many games Microsoft probably won't have at E3 I guarantee no Xbox fanboy would be saying 'good points there'.