All Channels
Popular
210°

Your Starhawk Questions Answered

Posted by Dylan Jobe: I can’t believe I’m posting on the PlayStation Blog again. It’s been forever! So what’s new you ask? Well, let’s see, not too much — oh yeah, we announced Starhawk! *cough* Finally. *cough*

Read Full Story >>
blog.us.playstation.com
Dart895488d ago

Mechanized jet bots FTW now we just need a release date.

LOGICWINS5488d ago (Edited 5488d ago )

Hopefully, they rework the flight controls so everyones on the same playing field. A lot of the people on Warhawk now are FREAKISHLY good considering they've had years of experience with the game.

And I PRAY that this game has no retarded boosters like COD and Uncharted. It should be just like Warhawk: Everyone gets the SAME tools to play with and the team that wins is simply the team with the most SKILL in using the tools correctly.

blusoops5488d ago

Please read article for the answer to your question...

MARKUS_MAX1MUS5488d ago (Edited 5488d ago )

L2P

Dont normally say that but its so appropriatte here, so your saying they should make the game easier for you just because you arent as good as other people?

Well if it bothers you so much that other people are better at the game put more time into getting better.

If you dont have the time then accept the fact that you wont be good because of that and just have fun.

LOGICWINS5487d ago

No..I can accept that people are better than me..who cares? I have better things to do than devote a chunk of my life to getting better at a videogame.

But for LightBox's sake, they BETTER make it so that everyone starts on the same playing field. Word of mouth is powerful and the average gamer isn't going to want to play a game where they get owned by people with no lives.

Wolfmoonstrike5487d ago

Wow slight logical fail there...

You hope they rework the controls so those with years of practice(and thus have more skill) have less of an advantage and then you go onto say that you hope they have no boosters so only skill is the deciding factor, lol.

Personally I agree with the no boosters but I disagree on reworking the flight controls.

vickers5005487d ago (Edited 5487d ago )

What they should do is give more defensive weapons to those who prefer ground combat. Against a skilled pilot, you were pretty much defenseless in warhawk, not to mention the long wait times and very few spawn points of the only weapon that could take out a Warhawk (an rpg).

Warhawks are too easy to zip around in and kill ground people with, and being a soldier on the ground against a Warhawk is extremely unbalanced and unfair. I don't think they should change the flight controls either, but they NEED to make soldiers a dangerous force to f*ck with. Maybe have each soldier have an ability (that they start out with, not that they pick up) to quickly deploy an emp and a forcefield that covers a certain radius, and the forcefield should last a LONG time or forever, but can only defend against warhawks, other people in things like jeeps and tanks can still damage the soldiers. The EMP thing would disable a warhawk in very close range of the solider and will make it immobile for a few seconds and start to fall out of the sky, that way people in warhawks don't get to f*ck with the soldiers so much.

Wolfmoonstrike5487d ago

I never felt like I was powerless against a warhawk. I Dunno about the last expansion pack (never got it) but it felt pretty balanced to me up to that. The AK, sniper rifle, and of course turrets were always good ways to take out a plane.

Really those skilled pilots could get pretty cocky at times, arrogance is a downfall lol.

But I guess in the spirit of fairness I was a pilot first and foremost. I just don't believe in dumbing down controls to "level the field".

Now increasing options is always a great thing so I couldn't disagree with having more defensive options at your disposal as long as it didn't ruin balance.

TL;DR= Disagree that soldiers were powerless, agree more options are a good thing as long as you don't ruin balance.

vickers5005487d ago

The AK47 didn't do sh*t against the Warhawks and the sniper rifles aren't really all that easy to aim at close range (which is what I'm talking about here. Turrets are good at taking them out yeah, but I'm not talking about being in the area of weapons, I'm talking about making your way across the battlefield without any vehicles or rocket launchers. If all you have is an AK47, a pistol, and a grenade out there, you're f*cked, and there's no getting around that.

No vehicles out in the open, no cover to find out in the open, no rocket launchers out in the open, just a damn airplane hovering above you laughing at how he could easily take you out with one missle and even if that soldier could get lucky enough and do some serious damage with an AK, all the Warhawk would have to do is fly away at super speeds, get the nearest health boost (which only takes about 10 seconds), come back and torment, then eventually kill the soldier on the ground.

Soldiers, were completely powerless if they had no cover, no rpg, no grenades, no sniper rifle, or no vehicles.

Now that I think about it, they should alter the controls of planes very slightly. Make it a little bit slower to switch from hover mode to flight mode and take off. Not too much, but like maybe 2 or 3 seconds longer.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5487d ago
Godmars2905488d ago

Still don't know if there are more vehicles or if the "zombies" have their own weapons, attack sets or again vehicles.

ALFAxD_CENTAURO5488d ago (Edited 5488d ago )

Looks great.
I knew Starhawk was in development when the 1st news about Dylan was working with Santa Monica Studios in 2010.
http://www.examiner.com/vid...

Nes_Daze5488d ago

Just beautiful, I like the light RTS aspect of the game, and those jets look incredibly fun to fly and land.

metsgaming5488d ago

i hope they restrict how much you can create buildings, it would be lame if everyone is just spamming buildings the entire time there should be some limit or you have to do something to earn it during the match.

InspectorG5488d ago

From what I understand you need to collect enough 'rift energy' from destroying buildings and killing enemies (from what we see in the videos) and you use that to build structures - some use large amounts others small amounts... so it is not like everyone will be able to spawn 100 walls/buildings around the place.

Not to mention the buildings themselves are all destructable

Show all comments (21)
100°

Best Sci-Fi Games on the PS3

From the cosmos to crash-landing back on good old planet Earth, come read through the best sci-fi-nastically games on the PS3

Read Full Story >>
altarofgaming.com
zaanan779d ago

Not a single Reistance? Fuck this article.

mastershredder779d ago (Edited 779d ago )

Starhawk over Warhawk?...... Dude, NO ONE should listen to you.

Odd choices for "best" more like you settled as these being the "best" that available to you at the time, cause a lot of these blow or were average to poor performers that ended up in bargain bin.

Missing too many great sci-fi titles here. The Void, The Resistance Series, Killzone 2 and 3, Enslaved, man.. there were so many, this is redicu-list.

FreeckyCake779d ago

Nobody should listen to you either with that attitude.

OtterX779d ago

I agree that Starhawk shouldn't be above Warhawk, however I must say that Starhawk multiplayer was incredible for its time! Many people wrote it off bc the single player was quite terrible, bc it was basically 1 huge tutorial for the multiplayer. But I can tell you never spent any significant amount of time in MP. It was doing incredibly tense base building w air, foot and land vehicle (and mech!) combat long before Fortnite was ever a thing.

I bet it would have been much better received if it had just ditched the story mode all together. So many people like yourself completely wrote it off based on reviews by reviewers that let the criticism of single player weigh heavily on their scores. I bet you didn't even play it.

Friendlygamer779d ago

The riddick games are some of the best stealth titles ever, highly underrated

YourMommySpoils779d ago

What games? All recall plating was Escape from Butcher Bay.

Friendlygamer779d ago (Edited 779d ago )

There's also the less acclaimed 'assault on dark Athena'

( also, not saying this to you specifically but there's both resistance and killzone games on the list, it's amazing how even something so simple and innocent as a game list can be turned into misinformed vitriol here lol )

jznrpg779d ago

Glad to see Resonance of Fate. Enslaved was pretty good too. I’m sure there are others nobody has listed but I’m too tired to try and think of anything

90°

Roundtable: Dead Game Franchises We Miss

With every big game now belonging to a big intellectual property, there are those that have become redundant. Here are the series' we miss.

RPGer1856d ago

I miss Dark Cloud I mean damn, Dark Cloud 2 is one of the best Action RPG game ever made. The game have: Rich Worlds, different setting, tons of contents, vareity in gameplay like never before (and even after), best buliding mechanics, crafting system like no one did and finally impressive graphics.

Most underrated game ever. It deserved the popularity and sales of Zelda and Final Fantasy. ut unfortunately, Level-5 and Sony didn't advertise it at all.

titans99991856d ago

My franchises I wish would make a come back, are Battlefront by pandemic studios - galactic conquest was the best, mercenaries 1 and 2, and prototype 1 and 2...great games!

50°

Pure Reminiscing: Starhawk

Pure PlayStation: Pure Reminiscing is a brand new feature from our very own Kyle Durant. It’s… different. Think of it like a mini-novel full of Kyle’s most weird and wonderful musings about games of yesteryear. If nothing else, at least it’s long enough to give you something to do on your journey to work in the morning….

Read Full Story >>
pureplaystation.com