All Channels
Popular
110°

Looking Back at the PSP

iAX: "When the PSP was unveiled in E3 2004, sanguine expectations about the portable success emanated all over the internet. With the incredible success of the PlayStation brand, the portable console was poised to conquer a new market. Executives at Sony said that they would be the ones to take handheld console gaming out of the ghetto. Fast forward to 2011, with 70 million sales the Sony PlayStation Portable is without a doubt the most successful competitor to challenge the Nintendo-dominated handheld console market. E3 2011 is when the successor of the PlayStation Portable will take center stage, to show details of the upcoming release and the game lineup. This successor is an heir to a unique console in the world of gaming. The PlayStation Portable will go into the sunset having a flourishing Japanese market, and an anemic American and European market. This console had a unique life that is worthy of study for any gamer."

Read Full Story >>
inside.anime-expo.org
remanutd555473d ago

i have played some very good games on the system but its time for NGP to take over !!!!

saladthieves5473d ago (Edited 5473d ago )

True. I'll always have my PSP around for years to come, and I've got so many games I've enjoyed. I would love to keep it around and from time to time play some of the games.

Someone on the NGP AR video wrote: "SHUT UP AND TAKE MY MONEY!"

miyamoto5473d ago

Japan aside, the PSP's weakness here was mainly about having games that did not appeal to the American handheld market.

Handheld market, thanks to Nintendo, is still easily dismissed as a toy for kids.

Even if Sony wanted to change the game, the PSP's value proposition as the gaming machine for the 19 & up did not catch on very well here in the West.

It worked very well in Asia & Japan, yes. Because it had the boatload of games the Japanese market wanted. Although the casual kiddie demographic dwarfs the teen age & mature demographic everywhere, the PSP still managed to successfully own that market.

But here in the America, no. The PSP did not have the games most 19 below & the 19 up wanted, the DS's market.

1) It lacked the kind of games that appeal to Western kiddie market &

2)putting games for mature gamers on a perceived kiddie plaything was a legit misfit.

I hope Sony learns its lessons an make the PS3 & NGP the well balanced platforms they needed to be.

in these hard economic times where many families only able to afford one console, these platforms needs to have all types of games from 5 year old kids to 50 year old gaming dads who have those 5 year old kids.

Gone are the days of everybody wanted to be 19. Today a platform needs to entertain all of the family members: young & mature alike at the same time.

the_bebop5473d ago

not till Final Fantasy Type-0.

Istanbull5473d ago

I'm not lookingback at the psp, psp is alive and it has the best lineup this year after the ps3!

Inception5473d ago

well said istanbull, bubles for you.

right now i'm playing lunar silver star harmony and legend of heroes. great time a PSP owner ^^

miyamoto5473d ago (Edited 5473d ago )

bubbles!

I am playing Gundam Battle Assault, FF VII & Dino Crisis 2 on my PSP and having a blast!!!

I think one of the worst thing to hit Sony was the INTERNAL conflicts between its execs that cost them billions then coupled with the big cost it already invested in developing the PS3.

The one thing I noticed about Sony after its near collapse before they released the PS3 was they lost a lot of marketing & advertising money. Making them the least when it comes to advertising way below Microsoft & Nintendo.

Sony has superior products but least marketing and the gaming media calling that ARROGANCE is cringe worthy! Sony is the most cash strapped of the three.

If it were not for the internal conflicts with in Sony the PSP & PS3 could have been marketed & promoted very differently.

Happythedog5473d ago

The economy is bad, people are going to be rejecting the 3DS and NGP for a PSP. PSP games are also cheaper so I don't see it going anywhere. You could also say the same about the DS too but graphics on the DS are super bad.

LiamIRL825473d ago

Am I stupid for just buying one? Just bought it for playing FFIX on the go.

Happythedog5473d ago

No you are not stupid you have good taste and one amazing game to play on the go.

Inception5473d ago (Edited 5473d ago )

Like happythedog said, you're not stupid Liam. If you like JRPG so much, than PSP is the right choice (with NDS too). And there's a lot of great JRPG on PSP that you can try, such as:

- Jeanne d Arc (level 5)
- Ys Oath in Felghana (Falcom)
- Ys 1 & 2 Chronicles (Falcom)
- Ys 7 (Falcom)
- Legend of Heroes: Trails in the Sky (Falcom)
- Half Minute Hero
- Persona 1 / Persona 3

Right now i'm waiting for Persona 2 and FF type-0

LiamIRL825473d ago

Sad to say I haven't played one of the games on that list! I would love to be able to play Persona 4 on the go though

Bluemaster775473d ago

PSP was a good run , but im excited to see the NPG is making its way to shelves in a timely manner

Falaut5473d ago (Edited 5473d ago )

I'll be honest here. When I bought it (release day), it was one of the worst timed purchases I could have made, then crisis core came out much later and it was finally justified. By this time I had two, one got "fried|" while updating with an OFFICIAL FIRMWARE (I still hold this ding against Sony to this day), so I bought another. A few months later I decided to PB my new psp because I felt that there was really a lack of games for me, yet I heard that you could run your old PSX games on it. So I did it. While doing this I found out that I could unbrick my "broken" psp by doing this. did it, now I had two PSPs rolling again. I updated one with official firmware and the other is still got custom on it. Since then I've played and finished the likes of Front Mission 3, Parasite Eve 1. The only games I have bought since Crisis Core where Tactics Ogre (my god this game is good) and more recently FFIV rerelease. So before this turns into anymore of a story...in my opinion:

PSP in terms of hardware was really nice for its time. Sony REALLY fudded up by not being able to spin its 3000+ psx library into its ecosystem through marketing. Because of this reason you had mass people "pirating" on this thing, and off course people jumped on it and said it failed because of that. No, I actually think Sony sold more units because of it, but just like buying a car though, a dealership doesn't make money on the sale of the car, the gravy is in bringing the car back to service at said dealership (software). not my best analogy.

Hopefully this won't be the case with NGP, because I havn't learned from my first experience...day one! lol

80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
20d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted19d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8519d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele18d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla18d ago (Edited 18d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk18d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay18d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 18d ago
Athlon10119d ago (Edited 19d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit18d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg18d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10118d ago (Edited 18d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14919d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
32d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_32d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle32d ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker32d ago (Edited 32d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit32d ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog32d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_32d ago (Edited 32d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog32d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad32d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_32d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage32d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda32d ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

32d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
40°

Sony Shows Off 20 Minutes of Crimson Desert on a Base PS5

Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
BlazedKong58d ago

looks god awful on the base systems