All Channels
Popular
310°

Microsoft Grabs PayPal As Protection Against Hackers?

Instead of inputing a credit card that is stored in the system, people will have the option to simply log into their PayPal accounts to make a purchase. Microsoft makes the first push to protect gamers.

Read Full Story >>
battlestrats.com
lostinplace5492d ago

Not to say that Microsoft is invulnerable to a hacker attack, but I think it is a helluva lot less likely thanks to this.

LOGICWINS5492d ago (Edited 5492d ago )

Good to see that Microsoft realizes that hackers are a SERIOUS threat.

@ChadWarden- Nothing..but it helps. If ur making a purchase off Ebay, would you rather use Paypal or just give another person(whom you don't know) your credit card information? Why NOT use Paypal and make it EASIER for people to get to your money?

Geez, people seriously don't like positive Microsoft news on this site huh?

NEWS ALERT: Sony gives free security plan to PS3 owners for ONE year!

"YAAAAY! Sony always has put backs!"

NEWS ALERT: Microsoft allows users to use Paypal..FOREVER

"Meh..Paypal could still get hacked"

^^See, the double standard here.

optimus5492d ago (Edited 5492d ago )

paypal doesn't work that way. you can make purchases just by your email as the article mentioned. I can choose how much money i put into my paypal account.

i meant to reply to chadwarden.

LOGICWINS5492d ago (Edited 5492d ago )

Ummm, yeah I know...which is why I'm recommending it and saying its GOOD that Microsoft adopted it.

@optimus-Oh okay.

pixelsword5492d ago (Edited 5492d ago )

One of three things are happening:

1. they are about to slam the door on hackers for their games, but are getting the protection inside-out instead of games first like Sony did (the smarter choice)

2. There was an actual vulnerablity but they found it before anyone else did

3. Seeing that they got skype for no logical reason, it seems likely that the internet going "pay cable" may just be true.. unless we make our congressmen/women stop it.

ps3destroyer5492d ago

Very smart move.Everyone thinks of paypal as a great way to buy online.Microsoft is on the run to steal the show this e3 for sure.

DaReapa5492d ago

Even though I do agree this is a very good thing for MS (one of which Sony really needs to adopt), tell me what exactly does this has to do with E3??

Mr_Luke5492d ago (Edited 5492d ago )

ok, Microsoft did a great move, i use Paypal since it was out and it's a great service but.... if the "bomb" of M$ for this year E3 would be that, i feel sorry for them.
I don't see the relation between adopting this service and "stealing the show" tho...

Krakn3Dfx5492d ago (Edited 5492d ago )

What? "Well, we don't have any games, but we got Paypal!"

If a new billing option is all it takes to win E3 this year, the bar must be pretty low.

This will be another Nintendo E3.

gamingdroid5492d ago

However, I doubt MS reasoning is security motivated, but more to do with reaching more customers. If it was security concerns, they would have moved their entire credit card database to Paypal. As it is, there is two places to loose information now.

Also, the article needs to research more:

"This is also how eBay conducts a large percentage of their sales as well because it is fast, easy, and doesn't require eBay to hold banking or credit information on their server. "

Ebay owns Paypal! Essentially storing it on Paypal's server is no really different than storing it in Ebay's... Whatever setup they have can be replicated either way, and provides no more security. Duh!

xxxAnubisxxx5492d ago

It's a separate server, so even if they are owned by the same group, it doesn't matter from a hacker standpoint

gamingdroid5492d ago

What I'm saying is that the fact that it is "assumed" stored on separate server is irrelevant to security, because it would almost certainly be stored on separate servers anyhow for security reasons.

The fact that Paypal operates under it's own name, doesn't make it any more secure than if it was wholly part of eBay. It's just organizational and doesn't affect security.

Fallouts5492d ago (Edited 5492d ago )

@gamingbird
im going to "assume" that you dont know anything about pay pal and hope that the hackers are as clueless as you..

i dont know about it much my self either but im going to go out on a limb and say that out sourcing the payment method to a company that is 100% focused on security, has the experience and more then likely much better security measures can take the chances of a hacker getting your info quite low..

i understand that its still not imposible to hack pay pal but the chances are even lower than ms or sony doing it them selves.. not only that but they avoid the huge headache sony is going through right now over all the legal stuff..

it seems like its hard for you to admit but this is a very smart move on ms's part and honestly imo ms couldnt of had planned this better, right after sony's breach! maybe its a coincidence in timing. you know how everyone has been saying " im surprised ms isnt talking smack" well, imo this is a HUGE but silent smack to sony's face... they really dont and shouldnt have to respond to anything on what happend to psn after a move like this..

but im sure sony will add it to the ps3 too then everyone will be like "sony invented it yesteryear they just been waiting to perfect it, so it was ms that played follow the leader"... j/k

gamingdroid5492d ago (Edited 5492d ago )

"im going to "assume" that you dont know anything about pay pal and hope that the hackers are as clueless as you.."

I will give you the benefit of the doubt and ask, how am I clueless? If anything, your comment shows the opposite.

"i dont know about it much my self either but im going to go out on a limb and say that out sourcing the payment method to a company that is 100% focused on security, has the experience and more then likely much better security measures can take the chances of a hacker getting your info quite low.."

I never said otherwise...?

"i understand that its still not imposible to hack pay pal but the chances are even lower than ms or sony doing it them selves.. not only that but they avoid the huge headache sony is going through right now over all the legal stuff.."

There are plenty of providers of credit card processing and one swift move to another company by transferring all the credit card details currently kept by MS will relinquish MS of all responsibility. Instead, they added another payment option with Paypal and still keeping their risky options.

That is NOT done in the name of security!

It seems instead that you misunderstood me (giving you the benefit of the doubt again), I simply commented on the author assumption that because credit card payment was processed by Paypal meant it was safer for Ebay, when in fact both companies are one and the same. If you control both organizations, slapping a separate name on it doesn't make it safer or more secure!

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5492d ago
+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5492d ago
chadwarden5492d ago

What's stopping people from hacking into paypal?

NYC_Gamer5492d ago

there is nothing stopping them...

xxxAnubisxxx5492d ago

PayPal holds enough personal information to ruin banking for several weeks at least. If it was possible to do, it would have been done.

NYC_Gamer5492d ago

@xxxAnubisxxx

its not impossible just because it has not been hacked yet....

xxxAnubisxxx5492d ago

I guess impossible wasn't the right word... but it's a much more appealing target than PSN, and yet PSN was the one hacked. Obviously, it isn't easy to do because it hasn't been done yet.

-Alpha5492d ago (Edited 5492d ago )

I suppose it takes responsibility out of MS's hands and pockets in case account information gets hacked.

ps3destroyer5492d ago

There's nothing on the os3 stoping them you meant right?

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5492d ago
Warprincess1165492d ago

Sony needs to read this article. Dozens of people want paypal to be added to PSN. Hopefully this isn't some kind of exclusive deal.

news4geeks5492d ago (Edited 5492d ago )

sony is the type of company not to do it specifically out of spite of us asking.

badz1495492d ago (Edited 5492d ago )

have been craving for this option since as long as I remember being a PS3 owner! Paypal is so much better for PSN! lets just hope Sony follows

Kalowest5492d ago

Smart move MS, so if you ever get seriously hacked like Sony, you can put some of the blame on PayPal.

-Alpha5492d ago

They can put ALL the blame on PayPal-- you'd have to hack PayPal, not MS.

Very smart move.

awiseman5492d ago (Edited 5492d ago )

Well thats true, but MS wont be hacked then, it will be paypal.

Fallouts5492d ago (Edited 5492d ago )

EXACTLY!!!

ceekay,

you bring up agood point!!!

BYE5492d ago

Well in that case you could still blame Microsoft to have chosen Paypal. I'm sure some people would.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5492d ago
iNFAMOUZ15492d ago

ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh here we fucken go again, ENOUGH WITH THESE ARTICLES, don't bring microsoft into this. Let this die already.

Show all comments (45)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai33d ago (Edited 33d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio33d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing33d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9233d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit33d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing33d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9233d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay35d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn235d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers35d ago (Edited 35d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn234d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown35d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos35d ago (Edited 35d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay35d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay35d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac34d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger35d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300035d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde35d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood35d ago (Edited 35d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde34d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)
50°

'The big things that we're thinking about'

In an exclusive interview with Game File, new(ish) Xbox boss Asha Sharma and Xbox chief content officer Matt Booty explain their vision for Microsoft’s gaming division

Read Full Story >>
gamefile.news
Agent7536d ago

A good start would be to release games to go with the console. My Xbox Series X has gathered dust virtually from launch. My advice would be to ditch a next console and release games on PC, PlayStation and Switch. Another idea would be a hybrid console based on Xbox Series X tech and go the same route as Nintendo. Another idea would be to pull out of gaming altogether. Plenty of options there.

Reaper22_34d ago

Why would they pull out? They have the momentum. Sony has been getting nothing but bad news lately.