240°

Uncharted 3 Multiplayer Influenced by Killzone

Naughty Dog's Evan Wells has compared Uncharted 3: Drake's Deception multiplayer to Killzone's online game modes.

Read Full Story >>
ps3center.net
Crazyglues5407d ago (Edited 5407d ago )

This doesn't surprise me at all because, these guys are genius and they are a 1st party developer's so they are Looking at everything from the other 1st party guys..

Resistance 3, Killzone 3, Infamous 2, all 1st party developers share their tech with each other, so it makes sense that they would look at K2 and K3 since those are some of the Multi-players that gamers seem to love..
They may even do dedicated servers which Killzone did, that would just be Awesome...

Love the game type idea too, one thing about that game-type I found was it made the online experience a lot of fun..

Naughty Dog really does try to make the best possible game every time out... so yeah I'm not surprised by this move, and I'm also super excited now..

No question in my mind this game is going to be sick..

.____........___...____
.____||......||.......____||
||.........___||.......____||

tehpees35407d ago

nice to see Sony's devs helping each other

Sheikah5406d ago

It's the same with how InFamous 2 devs were helped model Cole by the Naughty Dog team.. That was cole mark II btw. It's good for them to work together - gives a better quality product in the end

-Alpha5406d ago

IMO it's a nice comparison, Power Plays sound sweet. I love Warzone's concept, more games should adopt it.

And sadly, UC3 is confirmed not to get dedicated servers.

LOGICWINS5407d ago

Praying this game has Move support.

metsgaming5407d ago

im pretty sure they said no. Plus the controls for uncharted are perfect no need to change them or add move support.

gaffyh5407d ago

I think they said no because it doesn't make sense or something.

Ju5406d ago

Why wouldn't it work? Works perfectly for FPS (Killzone3) and 3rd person (Socom4). And it has no impact how you play with the DS3 at all. I can't even touch a DS3 for shooters any more. So, please, Move for UC3 (and R3), please.

Sheikah5406d ago

That said they'd not include Move support. They wanted a game based on the move if they were to use it - not just an implementation for the hell of it.

LOGICWINS5407d ago (Edited 5407d ago )

^^I was told by another N4G member that ND went to his GF's college and when asked about Move support, the guy representing ND said that the game would support Move. Its nt 100% concrete evidence but its enough to give me hope.

And btw, they never outright said "no", they just said that there nt obligated to implement Move.

metsgaming5407d ago

i believe there was an interview where they asked one of the devs and they said they thought about it but it added nothing to it. Im to lazy to look it but you never know they could change their mind.

LOGICWINS5407d ago

Yeah, ND is a master at surprising people. I'm sure they'll do it. I bet most didn't believe that UC2 would have a multiplayer aspect, and decent one at that. Still happened.

himdeel5407d ago (Edited 5407d ago )

You know I enjoy the Move with Killzone 3, RE5 GE, & Socom 4 and prefer to play those games with the Move+Sharpshooter but I don't necessarily want Move with Uncharted 3. However if they add Move support I'd use it but only in the single player campaign.

Troll_Police5407d ago (Edited 5407d ago )

To be the best you have to beat the best and they are drawing inspiration from the best in Killzone 3.

LoaMcLoa5406d ago

Dude, Killzone 2's multiplayer was waaay better than the third one. The third one is basiclly COD in space. Sorry, but that's the truth.

Sheikah5406d ago

I'm not here to argue or anything - but makes it CoD in space exactly? I find it very different from CoD with the different classes and roles. Are you referring to the saboteur class, or?

I'm rather liking Killzone 3 - it's not perfect, but it's a very solid online shooter. I do now, however, like the recent CoD titles. They pretty much dropped the ball after Modern Warfare (1) and it's been a downward slope ever since.

Personally, I pledge my alligience with the Battlefield games above the latter two.

Uncharted3Goty5407d ago

Uncharted 3 Game of the year Game of the Year on Chrismas.

Message brought to you BY Uncharted3Goty

Big-Boss5406d ago

and co signer BIGGGG BOSSSS

Jack-H5406d ago

And witness to the signing JAAAACCKKK.... (actually i think skyrim will probably win) REALLY looking forward to both!

5407d ago Replies(3)
Show all comments (42)
50°

Uncharted Cast Doesn’t Take the Games’ Success For Granted at MCM Comic-Con

During MCM Comic Con London X EGX, CGM got the chance to be part of a press group interview with the stars of the Uncharted titles, namely the legendary Nolan North, who played protagonist Nathan Drake, Emily Rose, who portrayed Elena Fisher and Richard McGonagle, who took on the role of Victor ‘Sully’ Sullivan,

Read Full Story >>
cgmagonline.com
160°

Analyzing 'Uncharted: Drake’s Deception' – Wait, What is The Game About?

Uncharted 3: Drake’s Deception has a lot to live up to as Uncharted 2: Among Thieves is an incredible and near-perfect game.

Read Full Story >>
goombastomp.com
Profchaos1584d ago

It's about retirement...oh wait

UNCHARTED2FANATIC1584d ago (Edited 1584d ago )

I cant even say what the point was its easily the worst story in the series. The online was a whole lot of fun though but overall doesn't come even close to 2

porkChop1584d ago (Edited 1584d ago )

It was a step back for sure. Personally, I thought even the MP was way better in U2. Solid game, glad I played it. I just think they didn't push as hard as they did with U2.

UNCHARTED2FANATIC1579d ago

Yes both the online and story was better in 2 no doubt

Flewid6381583d ago

The "young Drake" portion was pretty top notch, story-wise. But yeah, everything outside of that I felt was inferior.

DanielEndurance1584d ago

Villains were all over the place in this… one second they wanted Drake dead, the next they needed him, then they want him dead again, then they coulda killed him, but poisoned his friend instead, then coulda shot him again, but had brunch with him, then needed him alive, then coulda mowed him down, but decided to kill him by fire and let him escape… Uncharted 2 was way better. 😅😅

slowgamer1584d ago

=D Sounds crazy. I don't remember any of that. Played it on ps3 and I remember thinking that why was this game so bashed compared to second one. I liked it.

Chocoburger1583d ago (Edited 1583d ago )

Another thing that annoyed me about UC3 events was the agent Talbot teleporting around Turkey. It just felt off to me, and made no sense.

Also, for about one third of the game, you go on a wild goose chase to rescue Sully, who wasn't even there to be rescued, and you end up back where you started again. There was simply no pay off for all the events you go through, so it fell flat in that regard as if they couldn't figure out how to make the game longer, so they decided to side-track you to do something with no pay off, hoping you wouldn't notice due to all the incredible action set pieces they made.

Overall though, even with its flaws, I still enjoy the game.

TheEnigma3131583d ago

This was actually my least favorite in the series. Didn't have that same impact that part 2 set.

Flewid6381583d ago

Uncharted 2 is the pinnacle of the series (to me).

Granted, 4 had the best story in my opinion, but 2 was the overall best game.

Show all comments (12)
210°

Uncharted 3 Anniversary Retrospective: Shackled By Its Precursor's Legacy

A decade after its release, how does Uncharted 3 fare today? Does its story still work? Was its precursor’s legacy a bedrock or quicksand for its own aspirations?

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
1585d ago Replies(2)
SullysCigar1585d ago

When arguably the weakest game in the series is still awesome and more fun than most games today, you know you're onto a winner!

coolbeans1585d ago

I'd extend "arguably" before awesome too. Many technically demanding scenes were jaw-dropping for the time, but it's tough to ignore the sub-par context propelling the action forward.

SullysCigar1584d ago

Tough for you, perhaps, and that's fine. I enjoyed it very much. Perhaps a little less than the others in the series, but then the bar is extremely high.

I remember being blown away by the water and sand tech in U3 for the time too. It certainly was a visual treat!

LucasRuinedChildhood1584d ago (Edited 1584d ago )

It is very good, but when I originally played Uncharted 3 it was the most disappointed I'd ever been in a video-game because Uncharted 2 was just that good. I enjoyed 3 much more when I replayed it in the Nathan Drake Collection though. I could just enjoy it for what it is and accept that it's not Uncharted 2 - it's not a roller coaster, and it doesn't balance and rotate between action, puzzles, platforming and set-pieces in the same way.

Uncharted 3's gameplay is a bit more compartmentalized and focused on one thing at a time. I'm not surprised the scrapped version of Uncharted 4 was going to have no gunplay for the first half. It's also paced much differently - it takes a long time to get to the notable set-pieces. Uncharted 2 is insane from Nepal onwards which is about an hour into the game. haha.

I did like the introduction of chase sequences, and I love first hour (bar fight, young Drake) and from the airplane sequence onwards but I just think the rest of it just sort of meanders along without as much purpose as 2.

When it comes to the script, you can feel the absence of Neil Druckmann and Josh Scherr (writer on every other console Uncharted game). Drake gets hit in the face, and the game goes on a random side plot for an hour to give you some boat set-pieces. He then washes up on a beach close to where Elena is staying to get you back to the real plot. Drake just says "How convenient" to try make you laugh off how sloppy the plot got.

In retrospect, I'm not sure if Naughty Dog were ready to work on 2 different games at once. 3 clearly had production issues that 1 and 2 didn't have, and Hennig's version of 4 didn't work out. They had to crunch so hard to get the rebooted version done on time that Bruce Straley gave up making video-games.

coolbeans1584d ago

I'll give you some props for the extra analysis. I remember Druckmann climbing his way to a writer spot in UC2, but wasn't aware of Josh Scherr. I didn't know that was the reason for Straley's departure either. That's pretty damn rough.

GhostofHorizon1584d ago

They had to make some weird choices as far as story went because the actor for Cutter had to bail which left a few holes in the story.

Uncharted is one of my favourite series and while the leap from 2 to 3 was not nearly as big as the leap from 1 to 2, I think it was an amazing experience none the less.

coolbeans1584d ago

Graham McTavish's departure wasn't easy, but I don't think that would fix many holes tbh. Because the main issue to consider is the precarious mindset Naughty Dog was operating on: an increased emphasis in set pieces that HAD to go in and worrying about the context later.

Petebloodyonion1584d ago

I really liked part 3 ( Among Thieves is still the best in my opinion) My only complaint was the interactions with the villains and how they were a missed opportunity, Linda MacMahon (Marlowe) was an interesting antagonist due to the history with Sully and Nate but it fails basically flat especially with her ending. And I couldn't care about Navaro 2.0.

What I did love and made me care was Cutter, in the short time he was in the game you could feel that the guy was a good treasure hunter for example when he pulled his own notebook with the clues he founds so the team can escape a room.
It was a small touch that add a lot to the character.

Good-Smurf1584d ago

Marlowe was played by Rosalind Ayres.

MadLad1584d ago (Edited 1584d ago )

I have mixed feelings on the series. I still own all of them on the PS3, and the collection for PS4, but I didn't truly "love" any of the games until 4.

They're good games, but they always stumble on some element.
The first is good, but the climbing mechanics weren't exactly fine tuned with the first showing. Not to mention the spongey enemies if you played on anything past normal; but you're then faced with a fairly unchallenging game experience.
The second mostly fixed the climbing, but added in a pretty clumsy stealth mechanic.
Three was just two with a new story.

Four got it right though.
I don't remember once getting annoyed by any mechanic had in the game.

I know that everyone has a soft spot for 2, and 3 is sort of the black sheep of the series; but they did, overall, get progressively better. Which doesn't always happen.

Show all comments (28)