All Channels
Popular
490°

Microsoft & Sony to rush next consoles?

Nintendo have stated they are going to reveal their new console at E3 and, predictably, there are a lot of rumours about the console. From names to controllers to the actual hardware, the internet has been abuzz with possibilities of the new console. But what about Microsoft & Sony? Will they rush development of their new consoles to catch Nintendo?

Read Full Story >>
randomprodinc.com
Godmars2905498d ago

Sure, why not do it again...

RedDead5498d ago (Edited 5498d ago )

If they do, i'll probably be waiting another 2 years after they release, I made the mistake of getting an original Xbox, broke so many times(including replacements though haha). I'll have to wait for a decent amount of game's on them aswell. Hopefully MS can build the machine properly this time, I don't mind so much if the first release has a few problems but that should be solved within a year, not 3-4 years like the red ring and E74

reynod5498d ago (Edited 5498d ago )

Question?

Why buy a 500usd console at launch, when you could get a great PC for 700-800 usd. then have all games cheaper too, nvm putting yourself at the complete mercy of a company to even host stuff like online, the stuff you can play on the machine that you bought, pay to go online, no mods, no gaurantees of BC.

Urrakia345498d ago

@reynod- Because you can't play Uncharted, Metal Gear Solid 4, God of War 3, LittleBigPlanet 2, Twisted Metal, inFamous 2, Resistance 3, SOCOM 4, or Gran Turismo 5 on a PC.

Caleb_1415498d ago (Edited 5498d ago )

@Urrakia - note he said 'at launch'. What is the point in buying a console at launch when it takes this long for the generation to really get into its stride? Why not buy a PC with that kind of money where you'll have access to a huge game library; then buy a console further down the road when good games have been released for it and the kinks have been worked out? A perfectly sound approach imo.

Substance1015498d ago

@urrakia34

No ones stoppping you from buying that console when prices are low and it actually has games.

Its a known fact at the start of gen consoles hardly have any games. I personally have over 120 games on Steam alone, I know those will be working for me when the next consoles launch on whatever PC i have at that time. How many games do you think will be working from the PS1,PS2, on the PS4? good chance none of them will work hell even PS3 games might not work.

AAACE55498d ago

How did you break the original Xbox? I bought mine a year after release and played tons of games on it and it lasted me until I bought a 360! I thought it would have gave out long before that!

By now it's obvious both 360 and Ps3 were rushed to market! The 360 had it's hardware failures. Ps3 is unnecessarily complicated to deal with because they made the console first and threw the software in last.

iamnsuperman5497d ago

@reynod not everyone can afford an extra $200-$300. Fair point about launch but exclusives for the PS3 are actually only on the PS3 so why buy something 200-300 more expensive to play mutliplat games which btw tend to look the same (noticeable exceptions like BF3 and Crysis 2) which also in a couple of years the graphics card will be out of date so have to shell out more money

NukaCola5497d ago

It may be rushed but I don't see them revealing this year. I mean there are still games coming in 2012 and 2013 for the current consoles.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5497d ago
hennessey865498d ago

let me give you a comparison. The ferrari 458 italia was deliverd to customers and in certain cases it would set on fire because of an unforseen problem. Do you not think its possible that the 360 had an unforseen problem which microsoft dealt with as have ferrari

Raendom5498d ago

Unforseen problem? I'm not being a fantard here but if it were unforseen why would they have a specific error message for it? It's not like the Italia had a "windscreen on fire" light.

hennessey865498d ago

it might have been an unforseen problem. I cant be certain

5498d ago
mastiffchild5498d ago

Either they(MS) knew of RROD and E74 pre release but they certainly didn't test the machine nearly enough before releasing it-a trend which everyone making games seems to be joining in with. We pay retail prices for games and consoles just to do QA.

I think MS knew they HAD to be out first and made sure they were and damn the fallout. They chanced it and when RROD became epidemic changed their stance and brought in a better(but not watertight by any means) warranty to avoid a crippling mass recall. Twas the only way to make devs and publishers break from PS2 exclusivity imo and they HAD to do it even with an undertested console.360 would have struggled had they not got that market from releasing first IMHO.

PirateThom5498d ago

The 360's troubles were well documented, it's not some oversight, when they were being manufactuered, they were failing and, to meet deadlines, they shipped them anyway with the view they'd refueb returns and fix later batches.

I read a really good article, it wasn't overly critical, just tried to explain what happened and why it was allowed to happen.

NukaCola5498d ago

The first 360 was a hunk of crap. 12gigs of memory, discs always got scratched, it over heated, and it didn't even have an hdmi output. I would wasy the system was very rushed.

steve30x5498d ago

@NukaCola : I thought the Xbox360 has less than 1GB of memory..................... Oh wait your making the same mistake I saw so many times when I was working in a computer repair shop. You are calling the Hraddrive memory.

madjedi5498d ago (Edited 5498d ago )

@hennessey Yeah anyone that was remotely knowledgeable about building computers, knew the problem when they looked at the motherboard, a blatantly obvious lack of gpu cooling on the original version 360.

Even a new system builder isn't that damn stupid to not have good cooling on your cpu/gpu, let alone microsoft hardware engineers, if that wasn't rushed what is.

Ms should have done a whole new cooling and motherboard/case set up after it was discovered to be a problem, instead trying to get away with duck tape/piecemeal solutions.

Would likely been alot cheaper early on, than the 1.5 billion to cover millions+ of system replacements.

Steve30x If your going to point out his mistake you could have at least spelled hard drive correctly.

HardCover5497d ago

I've read articles from Microsoft employees that say otherwise.

They thought it wouldn't be a big deal, just like they thought the PS3 was releasing one year before it actually did.

This was Microsoft's second console. They had a few slip ups in their decisions. That's what happened, it's the truth.

sarshelyam5497d ago

Not likely. Ferrari components aren't built and assembled in a half dozen different factories all across the world.

The 360 hardware issues were a direct result of a lack of Quality Assurance due to an assembly plan spread too thin, and unmaintained workmanship is only partly to blame.

Literal analogy only does the job to make your initial argument look weak.

Istanbull5497d ago

the 360 was rushed, it released 1 year earlier then the current gen consoles and 2nd:

Microsoft KNEW about the RROD and heating problems BEFORE 360 released! Stop defending your beloved company u xbot, it only makes u more pathetic when u claim not to be a fanboy

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 5497d ago
fluffydelusions5498d ago (Edited 5498d ago )

The 360 is more or less just a PC that is dedicated to gaming. This is why it's easiest for devs to work with. Sony went in a bit of a different direction with the PS3 which is why devs struggled at first. All MS has to do next round is up the specs so I wouldn't say they are rushing. It's basically just a new PC minus the OS and such. I'm hoping Sony follows suit and makes it easier for devs next time around which is what they are doing with the NGP.

metsgaming5498d ago

microsoft might, sony no i dont think so. MS should really learn from last time and take their time.

vishant1015498d ago

sony rushed their ps3 more then m$ rushed the 360

RioKing5497d ago

^Really? How did Sony rush it more than MS?

And metsb? What makes you think Sony won't learn anything from previous mistakes if they already are proving it with NGP?

Ignorance is bliss...

DaTruth5497d ago

Really? I thought the PS3 was delayed! How do you rush something and delay it at the same time?

Zydake5498d ago

No... I hope it doesn't get rushed that'll be a shame.. I bet if the 360 had more time the RROD wouldn't have been a problem. For the PS3 perhaps they could've done more tests and stopped the YLOD? (I don't see the Ps3 as rushed LOL)

Godmars2905498d ago

Yeah, because a failure rate of 2-10% is the same thing as 30-60%.

Nevermind my main gripe with the reliance on UE3 when it was likely as problematic as Windows Vista.

madjedi5498d ago (Edited 5498d ago )

@zydake The rrod would have been avoided almost entirely if ms's quality control group was allowed to do their job, instead of being told stfu it's going to be released regardless.

Yes because a fan going out and the system overheating, is the exact same thing as a system that is running normally, but still lacks adequate cooling due to a bonehead ceo/higher up not listening to his engineers./s

Really you had to have the difference explained to you wow, n4g never ceases to amaze me.

Valk5498d ago

30-60%??? LOL Some Sony fans never learn. Let me just pull some numbers out of my ass with nothing to back them up.

RROD wasnt near as bad as Sony fanboys want people to think.

Of course I'd love to know how you felt about Sony being forced to fix the PS2 through a class action lawsuit.

What we have here is a case of 2 companies selling faulty products only 1 decided to fix it themselves while the other was forced. Which company do you blindly follow again? Probably not the one you are making up false numbers to try to make look bad...

Oh and before you try to make the excuse. I have never owned nor will I ever own a MS console. That doesnt mean I am going to make stuff up about them though.

RioKing5497d ago (Edited 5497d ago )

Screw your "statistics". Here's my statistic, 8 out of 10 of my friends replaced their 360's MORE THAN ONCE because of RROD....1-2 out of 10 of my PS3 buddies replaced their launch ps3's.

Its that simple....looking at specific stats is just looking for an excuse to downplay the 360's failures. Not that the ps3 is perfect either though...

Edit: Btw I own both systems and don't say "Sony all the way". Its just that the 360 has given me much more problems... :/

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5497d ago
--------5497d ago

Although I agree with what Urrakia34 said, it is worth noting that you can build a capable gaming PC for 500 if you're on a tight budget.

I don't have one myself, but it was worth noting that it's possible at least, and Steam is the tits.

RioKing5497d ago (Edited 5497d ago )

Yes you can definitely build a decent gaming pc for the $$. But if you reaallly want a 360 or PS3 exclusive, like many of us do, then your $500 investment is basically doubled once you buy a console. And not many gamers can afford that...plus the cost of games, etc.

--------5497d ago

Agreed. It's all personal preference I guess, I'm a PS3 guy but I could see myself grabbing a rig one day, I believe with the addition of Steam and chrome they'll go well together!

Scyrus5497d ago

they better not pull a nintendo.

and MS better not do what they did this gen with the fail rate, the ps4 better not be 600$ either,

and in all honesty i wud rather them stick to this gen

damnyouretall5497d ago (Edited 5497d ago )

im the type of person to get shit day one, i get pumped up for new consoles and better games. lifes too short. anyways there are too many graphic card upgrades on computers for me too enjoy it. thats too much money to play that 2 or 3 great games, and theyre not often.

DA_SHREDDER5496d ago

I think Sony, Microsoft, and Nintendo have enough experience with the tech out now to not have to rush anything. At this point, all we need is just more RAM and better gpu's. Everything else will just all be about who has the best exclusive software. Just imagine developers not having to wrestle with lack of memory and crap gpu's anymore? If you asked me, next gen couldn't come soon enough. I could die tomorrow. I wanna wanna live to see a Mario Bros game that looks as good as Crysis 1 on pc.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 5496d ago
LOGICWINS5498d ago

Sure go head...I just won't buy em and keep gaming on my PS3 =)

5498d ago
fluffydelusions5498d ago

You say that now but if new consoles were to come out you wouldn't pick one up? I know I would.

5498d ago
LOGICWINS5498d ago

No, I wouldn't. You act as if a human being can't resist paying half a grand for a gaming console lol.

BeOneWithTheGun5498d ago

@logicwins. I can't resist. There is no way a new gaming console can come out and I just walk by it in the store for a year. No flipping way.

k2d5497d ago

-Of course- the average N4G-frequenter wants new consoles!

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5497d ago
5498d ago Replies(1)
Nes_Daze5498d ago

this gen has taught me that buying a console at launch is a huge mistake. If they rush out new consoles I'll wait at least a year to get them, as far as Nintendo, I won't be touching their consoles for a long time, until they stop releasing gimmicks that is.

5498d ago
soren5498d ago

gimmicks? define gimics? last time i checked those so called gimics worked really good or is buys 7 xbox 360 and paying for bad online not a gimmick? wb the crap load of ps3 controllers on ps3? is that not a gimmick to make u buy more remotes? or is it that they dont even try to make a decent controllers that wont break ever 60 days or so

Urrakia345498d ago

Decent controllers? I've never had a DualShock pad fail on me. Ever. And the "crap load of PS3 controllers" are there to bring variety. That's like saying having the same car available in different colors is just a gimmick. Sorry but you make no sense.

steve30x5498d ago

@Soren : I have two PS3 Six Axis controllers that are four years old and are still working as good as the day I got them. Also you dont need to buy the remote controls because the controller does a perfect job for controlling videos. I never bought a remote control.

iPlayGamez5498d ago

i have 2 sixaxis controllers that analogs messed up a few months after i got them. but my 3 dualshocks all still work fine. i think the original sixAxis controlers were meant to break so that consumers would buy more to make try and compensate for them selling the system at a loss of profit. ive never had a controller completely stop working though.

also stop defending the wii's motion controlls when a huge majority of it's games doesnt use the motion controlls well, and just tack them on to ps2 ports.

Blaine5497d ago

@Gloomy:

People who didn't get launch PS3 SKUs missed out on backwards-compatibility. Just saying...

(Although I did have one of those, and it went and got the YLoD on me! :( So you're not entirely wrong.)

TomInc5498d ago

I'd hope they dont.. the EA rumor yesterday whilst debuffed could still have some truth I guess. Of course any company would debuff something after the release.

With the official announcement of the new Nintendo console, and hype building I guess Sony and Microsoft would have reason to worry.. but it;d be a bad move on them if they pushed something out early.

Nintendo need a new console that will bring them into todays game.. Sony and MIcrosoft do not.. I think they'd be doing themselves in to announce this year.

steve30x5498d ago

I doubt Sony and M$ have anything to worry about with the new nintendo console. After all the majority of the games nintendo release are pure rubbish and it will sell just as wel as the wii which outsold the Xbox360 and PS3 so why would they be more worried now.

TomInc5498d ago

Depends... if they release a half decent system they could get some half decent publishers and devs bringing out games.

Show all comments (89)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai27d ago (Edited 27d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio27d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing27d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9227d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit27d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing27d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9227d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
30d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted29d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8529d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele29d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk28d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay28d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 28d ago
Athlon10129d ago (Edited 29d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit28d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg28d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10128d ago (Edited 28d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14929d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay28d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn229d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn228d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown29d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay28d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay28d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac28d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger29d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300029d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde29d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde28d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)