All Channels
Popular
200°

Sony security breach rattles consumers

Japanese electronics giant Sony's brand name is taking a big hit in US consumer perception, after hackers committed one of the largest internet security breaches in history against the company.

Sony pulled the plug on the PlayStation network back on April 19 after finding nearly 77 million user accounts had been compromised; including names, addresses and possibly credit card details from user accounts of its video game online network. A second security breach compromised users of its Online Entertainment Portal, used by PC gamers to play online.

Sony was one of the top three perceived electronics brands by US adults up for much of the last year – until the news about the security breach surfaced. They have now fallen several spots, according to YouGov BrandIndex’s daily tracking – and as of the last week now rank behind Apple, LG, HP, Kodak, Dell and Samsung.

Read Full Story >>
brandindex.com
M-Easy5496d ago

Yawn. More doom and gloom huh? Have any of these people ever heard of fatigue. We just want PSN back.

metsgaming5495d ago

its becoming boring. These articles are now just a borefest and i havent read any of them for a few while.

AAACE55495d ago

Anytime something bad happens, the doom speeches come out! It just goes with the territory.

belal5496d ago

is this really important for sony to be top 3?

Max_Dissatisfaction5496d ago

Brand image is very important so I'd say yes. Sony is a money making corp. Their main function isn't making really awesome games and keeping you happy contrary to popular belief. Their main function is to generate income and being perceived as a high ranking electronics brand is a very big part of generating income.
Basic economics and marketing.

upturned25496d ago (Edited 5496d ago )

They try to make us happy for our business. You're wrong. Sony's been in the gaming business for +15 years. They've made us happy. Why else do most of us "understand" their situation? Hackers aren't justified to do garbage like this.

PS3Freak5495d ago (Edited 5495d ago )

Regardless of what you think. The main goal of every business is to make money. That's just the way business works. If making their customers happy is how they make their money, then that's what they will do.

All big companies are the same.

I really hope this doesn't cause too big of a problem for Sony. I'd hate for my favorite game franchises to be gone.

Grenadan5495d ago

they are big electronics company so yes

th3_d3an5496d ago

All these people who are mad at sony now when they find out who is responsible you better direct that anger and hatred toward those people twice as bad otherwise just stick it up your ass!

LordStig5495d ago

strange I'm pretty sure I've seen similar articles yesterday, and the day before that, and the day before that, and the day before that, and the day before that...You've created a time paradox!

MariaHelFutura5495d ago

Personally my love for Sony began before online was ever implemented into a console. I`m in love with their 1st party devs, not PSN. Most games I`m completely content w/ playing SP. I own a 360 and don`t have online for that (by choice) and I still enjoy it.

Show all comments (15)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
26d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted26d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8526d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele25d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla25d ago (Edited 25d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk25d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay25d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 25d ago
Athlon10126d ago (Edited 26d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit25d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg25d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10125d ago (Edited 25d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14925d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
39d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_39d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle38d ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker39d ago (Edited 39d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit38d ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog39d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_39d ago (Edited 39d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog39d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad39d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_39d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage39d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda38d ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

39d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
40°

Sony Shows Off 20 Minutes of Crimson Desert on a Base PS5

Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
BlazedKong65d ago

looks god awful on the base systems