the polar opposite to how long its taking Kingdom Hearts 3 to get here.

It completely depends on the quality of the sequel.

theres no time limits for too soon - if the sequel justifies its release by being significantly different and as good or better than the previous game then i dont care if it comes out only 6 months after the previous game. i just care about the game, not how long it took or how quick its development was. but if it took 3+ years then it had better be good.

EVERY F**KING YEAR!!!!! *Cough* COD *Cough*

2-3 years is perfect. Shorter over saturates the game and longer is just frustrating, especially with unfinished story lines...AHEM...Half-Life.

Where the Fk is the next Half-Life. It like the best SP FPS ever made and it skipped (hid away like a coward) a generation.

All those Steam billions have made Gabe..uh..not fat.... but complacent...yeah. Seriously, I think he's terrified to compete with the current FPS market for some unknown reason. I don't know why either, 1 out of a gazzilion FPS games this gen had a great story (Bioshock) the rest were all MP centric.

Gabe release the next Half-Life, please.

No one is expecting COD sales, that game's popularity just makes no sense - it's McDonalds., Half-Life is filet mignon.

Time not important. Only life important

There should be enough time between sequels that DLC and support warrants it's value. Left for Dead 1 and 2 are an excellent example of being way to close together. there were a lot of L4D owners pretty angry when L4D2 was announced and released.

Tell me again how the multiplatform strategy was supposed to fix everything. Look at your results and compare them to Nintendo, which keeps thriving with exclusives. Your loyal fans are gone. And let’s not forget the pile of IPs you purchased only to let them rot.

The worst thing is this is down from last years numbers/expectations which was down from the previous years numbers/expectations. You think about how long “down” has been a consistent part of the communication and you realize those subscriptions are what’s holding that boat together. The price cut of gamespass is still a price raise in a string of price raises. They are trying to use players to offset the missing revenue. Now call of duty is out of gamespass, which is literally WHY they bought the company. To draw people to the subscription. They realized they missed a boatload of money and that wasn’t sustainable. Now you pay for it like you would have if they never bought the company… so why buy the company? Mind you those billions still need to be paid back. Yeah it gives you a chance to say we make the biggest FPS… but the internal conversations must be brutal at high level on topics that really matter. Like revenue. Profitability. And ROI for the shopping spree.

Is this like the 10th quarter in a row they're down 33% on hardware how is that even mathematically possible. You would think their mediocrity would Plateau